Raising Taxes On The Rich Would Reduce Income Inequality

Taft2016 said:
If Warren Buffet, Michael Bloomberg, Ross Perot, and Bill Gates were to liquidate all of their holdings into cash, how would raising the income tax impact them at all?

Answer: It wouldn't. You could raise the top tax rate to 92% and it wouldn't cost them a dime.

So all of the talk of "taxing the wealthy" is just that; "talk."

"Taxing the wealthy" is just libspeak for "taxing people with better jobs than me."
Click to expand...

BINGO; but remember, you're arguing with a dishonest clueless dunce stuck on stupid. LOL
 
Oh look! Another truth deflector post devoid of intellectual content and, instead, containing nothing but insults!

What a surprise!!! [/sarcasm off]
 
maineman said:
have any republican presidents ever vetoed a tax bill because of its progressively?

I'll bet not and none of them are any more of a Marxist than I am.

Shit... you're just all the other Faux fed GOP sheeple... that word is nothing but an epithet to you... you've never read a word of Marx's writings or have a fucking clue what Marxism is really all about.
Click to expand...

Start another thread shit-for-brains and stop spamming this one with your typical stupid off topic bullshit.

Moron. The topic is how raising taxes on the rich would reduce income inequality which is a remarkably stupid premise that only retards can agree with.
 
Isalexi said:
Of course it hurts us.....if there was more money collected from billionaires...actually not taxing them more, just restoring what they were paying which was fine with them, more money would mean better schools etc
Click to expand...

LMAO. Yeah dunce; the federal government funds school construction. You voted for Obama didn't you?
 
maineman said:
like I said, you're a Faux fed sheeple... you don't know a fucking thing about Marx other than, according to your handlers, it's a dirty word.

Did your one hitch at Gitmo and think you're a fuckin' military stud.... what a fucking joke.
Click to expand...

LMAO; you just can't help yourself can you shit-for-brains?
 
Truth Detector said:
Start another thread shit-for-brains and stop spamming this one with your typical stupid off topic bullshit.

Moron. The topic is how raising taxes on the rich would reduce income inequality which is a remarkably stupid premise that only retards can agree with.
Click to expand...

a premise which I have proven with a very simplistic arithmetic demonstration and which you have yet to disprove.

::yawn::

If you follow the discussion, you would know that Nova called me a Marxist for supporting progressive taxation. In my defense, I merely pointed out that, if supporting and condoning progressive taxation is the mark of a Marxist, then every president, democrat and republican, since Woodrow Wilson has been a Marxist.
 
Truth Detector said:
LMAO; you just can't help yourself can you shit-for-brains?
Click to expand...

can't help myself from using salty language in denigrating my opponents? Nope. I can't.

What differentiates me from you in that regard is that denigration is the sum total of the content of the vast majority of your posts.

That's ALL you have... insults and little else.
 
maineman said:
Marx is no hero of mine, bravs.... But I am smart enough to have actually read all of his major work and understand the basis of his philosophy. You've never read anything he ever wrote and are clueless as to what Marxism is beyond what your handlers feed you. I can't imagine stumbling through life like you do, relying on limited education and even more limited intellect. Every day must be a struggle... poor guy!
Click to expand...

LMAO; based on the dishomest bullshit that erupts from your keyboard, none of your crap could be confused as intellectual.

The only conclusion one can come away with reading your buffoonery is that it erupts from a low information dunce stuck permanently on stupid. A person who argues that Governments role is to be the arbiter of what is a fair income and stupidly believes that it can reduce income inequality through a progressive tax system. There's nothing intellectual in such dimwitted views.

You're a clueless dunce stuck on stupid; there is no kind way to describe the utter stupidity that erupts from your keyboard.
 
maineman said:
there are no textbook marxists, that is for sure... which seems to give the right license to call anyone they want a marxist. Marxism is not a piecemeal philosophy that operates well with other elements of other political philosophies or economic theories. It really is an all or nothing sort of system and, what is equally important is that the method of achieving it - through the dialectic process and the dictatorship of the proletariat vanguard - is very important in the process OF reaching it. In a capitalist society, if the people decide to set up public ownership of the electrical grid, that is not Marxist... if they want to publicly own the collection of trash, or the provision of security, or... even the provision of medical services, those pieces, established by democratic means in a capitalist system, are not "Marxist". Classic Marxism is the whole enchilada and the establishment of that enchilada through a very well defined series of relatively abrupt and cataclysmic events. When people label folks with whom they disagree as "Marxists", they merely misuse the word and highlight their own ignorance of it.... but I know full well that, for those folks who are on the "right" frequency, the dog whistle of the epithet "Marxism" is a powerful rallying cry.
Click to expand...

LMAO; ah yes, and the cabal of leftist buffoons who infest this forum with their special brand of stupid have no problems labeling those who disagree with them Teabaggers.

Not only do you bring a special brand of stupid to every thread, but also illustrate what an epic dishonest hypocrite you are.

Yes Commander Dunce; you really are THAT incredibly stupid, THAT dishonest and THAT big of a hypocrite. Yay you!
 
maineman said:
a premise which I have proven with a very simplistic arithmetic demonstration and which you have yet to disprove.

::yawn::.
Click to expand...

Wrong shit-for-bains; your "simple" math demo merely removed any doubt that you haven't the first clue what you are talking about and really are as stupid as you look.

But being the clueless idiot that you are, no matter how many times and how many posters point it out to you, you continue making the same stupid claim. Perhaps you aren't merely a dunce, but borderline retarded?

Dunce.
 
Truth Detector said:
Wrong shit-for-bains; your "simple" math demo merely removed any doubt that you haven't the first clue what you are talking about and really are as stupid as you look.

But being the clueless idiot that you are, no matter how many times and how many posters point it out to you, you continue making the same stupid claim. Perhaps you aren't merely a dunce, but borderline retarded?

Dunce.
Click to expand...

please explain why a progressive income tax does NOT reduce the post tax income differential between the people in higher tax brackets when compared to the lower tax brackets.

In fact, how can it NOT?
 
maineman said:
can't help myself from using salty language in denigrating my opponents? Nope. I can't.

What differentiates me from you in that regard is that denigration is the sum total of the content of the vast majority of your posts.

That's ALL you have... insults and little else.
Click to expand...

Wrong again shit-for-brains; what differentiates you from me is that you're a pathetic whiney hypocrite moron about it.

As for content; you can only make such a stupid claim about me by being the completely dishonest repugnant whiney shit-for-brains hypocrite that you are.

There's plenty of content in many of my posts; you're just too stupid to comprehend it and too dishonest to acknowkedge it.

Carry on Comrade.
 
Truth Detector said:
Read my signature you repugnant dishonest Marxist dunce.
Click to expand...
my quote that you use pointed out that you were running away from polling data from three well respected polling organizations because the data did not support YOUR version of events.... that is cowardly, don't you think? That DOES make you a disgusting little pussy....

my insult came on the heels of factual content... you insults come on the heels of other insults....


see the difference? moron?
 
maineman said:
a premise which I have proven with a very simplistic arithmetic demonstration and which you have yet to disprove.
Click to expand...

I disproved it when I factored in the constriction on the job market caused by the wealth redistribution, and you backpedaled by saying reducing the income gap wasn't the sole objective, and then failed to provide any other objective.
 
Truth Detector said:
LMAO; ah yes, and the cabal of leftist buffoons who infest this forum with their special brand of stupid have no problems labeling those who disagree with them Teabaggers.

Not only do you bring a special brand of stupid to every thread, but also illustrate what an epic dishonest hypocrite you are.

Yes Commander Dunce; you really are THAT incredibly stupid, THAT dishonest and THAT big of a hypocrite. Yay you!
Click to expand...

teabaggers labeled themselves tea baggers before anyone on the left did...

they hang bags of tea from their fucking hats.

On the other hand, I know of no liberal on here who has ever espoused marxism or ever called themselves a marxist.

see the difference there, moron?
 
Taft2016 said:
I disproved it when I factored in the constriction on the job market caused by the wealth redistribution, and you backpedaled by saying reducing the income gap wasn't the sole objective, and then failed to provide any other objective.
Click to expand...

and I don't think that you can prove that the constriction of the job market is caused solely by wealth redistribution.... and I certainly DID provide other objectives - the adequate funding of social programs being one.
 
maineman said:
please explain why a progressive income tax does NOT reduce the post tax income differential between the people in higher tax brackets when compared to the lower tax brackets.

In fact, how can it NOT?
Click to expand...

How many times are you going to ask the same painfully stupid question? A thousand more? You're a retard!!

The brain dead premise is not income differential you dunce; it stupidly argues that raising taxes will reduce income inequality. But no matter how many times and how much data is provided to explain why it won't, here you are, the retard, asking the same painfully stupid question over and over again like the repugnant dishonest dunce that you are.

And then you wonder why people point at you and laugh calling you stupid.

You really are THAT stupid and THAT dishonest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top