cancel2 2022
Canceled
The Americans took it over - they are mad for money, you know, poor dabs.
Why do speak in some kind of archaic patois? I don't get a lot of what you say so how do expect Americans to understand?
The Americans took it over - they are mad for money, you know, poor dabs.
Isn't it alarming, though, that there are so many of the weird nutters? I just hope some of them are cynical scoundrels putting it on, because no country could really carry so many idiots and survive!
Led... The word is led. Lead is not like read where the past tense and the present tense are spelled the same but pronounced differently this is likely because lead (when pronounced led) is a noun for a certain type of metal while red is an adjective describing a color.
You remind me of someone who naively believes that dishonest partisan assholes are interested in honest debate.
It is much better to point at them and laugh rather than try to engage them in a dialogue they have no interest in. But I do admire your persistence.
Led... The word is led. Lead is not like read where the past tense and the present tense are spelled the same but pronounced differently this is likely because lead (when pronounced led) is a noun for a certain type of metal while red is an adjective describing a color.
You've turned into a right cynical sod lately.
Just restating Taft's defense of the act.
Again, if you had any brains of note you would recognise her mental acuity as most here on the conservative side do. She is treated with respect by most members here, with rare exception.
Continue to make a fool of yourself though, by all means though.
You are so far beyond laughable as to be pathetic.
The rest of us will continue to respect those who deserve respect, regardless of ideology and dismiss those who don't, such as yourself, Nova, Right (aka SM, DY, Southern Man and Damn Yankee, Racist X (Storm X) and Racist Y (ILA).
Carry on.
Or one could look upon it as you defending theft of property.
Thank you.
I find it interesting that you responded to my misuse and not Rune's.
Siding with the libs again. Typical mod.![]()
Oh, so the real injustice was when the slave owner's lost their property in other humans.
I find it unfortunate that those who were defending state's rights were doing so because of the most vile, reprehensible, and indefensible actions known to free humankind. If it were not the case the North would never have had the support it would need to actually fight that war. Millions of US Citizens died in an unnecessary and useless (according to some in this thread as slavery was doomed anyway) war to defend or condemn the right of states to continue to allow people to be owned.
There was no "theft"... All men were created equal, that these people didn't care to follow the reality doesn't change what is. The States should never have allowed it, not while preaching those ideals. The idea that we could somehow have had a solution that would allow ownership of humans and kept a "free" nation whole without war is disgusting. The States have no right to violate human rights endowed by our Creator (per the founders) in that fashion. Not while remaining part of this union. If they had some benevolent right to own humans, it was indecent, more pornographic than images of naked men/women, and deserved to be nothing other than outlawed and turned into the most hideous and vile acts that ever existed in a nation that claimed to stand for freedom....
Nobody gives a shit about Rune, he is a prize prat who hero worships arseholes like Big Money, Poet and Howey.
I imagine the cut-and-dried simplicity of their viewpoints makes their lives much easier.
"Good. Bad. Good. Bad."
I expect a room full of them would sound similar to an Indian tribe in an old cowboy movie.
They did not care about State's rights. That's just a lie told by historical revisionists.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Tennessee_Convention_of_1861
I imagine the cut-and-dried simplicity of their viewpoints makes their lives much easier.
"Good. Bad. Good. Bad."
I expect a room full of them would sound similar to an Indian tribe in an old cowboy movie.
They did not care about State's rights. That's just a lie told by historical revisionists.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Tennessee_Convention_of_1861
Which changes the sentiments of my post, exactly, how?
I'll give you a hint, my post was a sardonic condemnation of idiots who say the South was fighting for "States' Rights" rather than slavery.
The States have NO RIGHT to violate the basic concept of human rights and say that they have some benevolent ideal. What they were defending, if such was the case, was the right of states to allow human ownership. It's disgusting to pretend that they were on the "right side".. States have no right to remove from you your natural rights endowed by your Creator, even if they were saying they were doing so to defend "States' Rights".
That war was about slavery, and the right side won.