A&E suspended Phil Robertson

you asked me what Robinson meant when he said what he said.....did he say they were happy about segregation?.....did he say they were happy about lynchings?.....of course, its in the best interest of your made up arguments if you can make it look as if he did..... everyone else can see your argument is false, but so what?......if you can convince even one, its a world of liberal win......

Just because you sing doesn't mean your happy. There are stories of slaves who sung. Many of blacks use music to forget about the tension of life. Again he used his small experience on a farm. Even if I gave him the benefit of doubt he is still wrong.
 
Just because you sing doesn't mean your happy. There are stories of slaves who sung. Many of blacks use music to forget about the tension of life. Again he used his small experience on a farm. Even if I gave him the benefit of doubt he is still wrong.

does that excuse your lying?.....
 
does that excuse your lying?.....

Ugh this accusation of lying is tiresome. I never made a statement of FACT. I made an anecdotal reference to what I think what closet bigots do. I never said Phil does this I said knowing conservative bigots (which is opinion reflects that) HE PROBABLY...Now try to prove the word probably implies a statement of FACT
 
you asked me what Robinson meant when he said what he said.....did he say they were happy about segregation?.....did he say they were happy about lynchings?.....of course, its in the best interest of your made up arguments if you can make it look as if he did..... everyone else can see your argument is false, but so what?......if you can convince even one, its a world of liberal win......

I'm not trying to proselytize you or anyone else. If you are an advocate of Phil Robertson and believe his message, then so be it.
As a young woman able to think for myself, I don't share Phil Robertson's homophobic closeted ideology, and I, just like you and anyone else, has the right to my opinion.
 
I'm not trying to proselytize you or anyone else. If you are an advocate of Phil Robertson and believe his message, then so be it.
As a young woman able to think for myself, I don't share Phil Robertson's homophobic closeted ideology, and I, just like you and anyone else, has the right to my opinion.

Would you be upset if Phil got fired for promoting gay marriage and the queer lifestyle?
 
He accurately articulated the religious doctrine of millions of Christians, seriously? Do you also equate homosexuality with the raping of animals. Do articulate for us.

They is absolutely the same in the eyes of God as far as each one being a sin. They rank right up there with ... lying and stuff.
 
But phil is ignorant. ESPECIALLY when he said blacks were ding good during Jim Crow. Then he goes on to say "We worked along with them because we're white trash."

So I guess since blacks were bottom dwellers any whites who worked with them are considered white trash. I guess he forgot to say he worked alongside them and got along because they are human beings. He is a typical conservative bigot who probably calls Obama a nigger behind closed doors but openly tells people he's not racist "I have black friends."

Speculation...
 
He said he worked in the fields alongside them. Of course the difference being he was a free man receiving pay.
He could say whatever he wanted and all the black folks could do was sing. Think about it.

Good grief....
 
One cannot be a [fundamental] Christian and not judge. If, as a Christian I am to abstain from sin ( that is not sin willfully) then it logically follows that I must judge what is sin and what is not. What I use as the standard when making that judgment is what's important. Jesus did not say, "Don't judge"....period. He said to use "Righteous judgment" when you judge. So no societal standards, no worldly standards. Righteous judgment. And when identifying what is sinful what do you think a fundamentalist Christian would use as the standard?

If a fundamentalist Christian makes the judgment that a homosexual is going to hell because the OT says that lifestyle's a sin, and I make the judgment that the fundamentalist is doomed for being uncharitable because Jesus said "Judge not, that ye be not judged", whose judgment trumps?
 
Why don't some if you ignorant leftists go to Sunday school with the little kids for a while so you at least have a basic understanding of the bible so you don't come across dumber than a retarded cockroach.
 
If a fundamentalist Christian makes the judgment that a homosexual is going to hell because the OT says that lifestyle's a sin, and I make the judgment that the fundamentalist is doomed for being uncharitable because Jesus said "Judge not, that ye be not judged", whose judgment trumps?

The NT says homosexuality is a sin. The word "judge" there means condemn. If the bible tells us homosexuality is sin, then the word of God is the judge. Not me or anyone. Do you understand?
 
Back
Top