PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
How did you vote?
???...I'm in neither.....
How did you vote?
And Pmp's comment "actually I have insurance that covers me if I get robbed....." is irrelevant. The insurance covers his stolen goods. It's not paying for the docs to sew him up if he gets beaten to a pulp during the robbery.
So you can see its chance of becoming law is slim to none.....
???....it's already become the law.....but it certainly isn't rare or new....Michigan became the 24th state to ban most abortions in its exchange plans when the state legislature passed a bill Wednesday afternoon by sizable margins.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/...-care-act-abortions-100985.html#ixzz2nEMGShG4
http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/what-is-choice/fast-facts/issues-insurance-prohibition.htmlCurrent State Laws
27 states prohibit insurance plans for public employees and/or private-sector individuals from covering abortion services: AL, AZ, AR, CO, FL, ID, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MA, MS, MO, NE, NC, ND, OH, OK, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, UT, VA, WI. Of these:
9 states prohibit abortion coverage in the entire private insurance market: ID, KS, KY, MO, NE, ND, OK, RI, UT.
Rhode Island has two separate insurance-prohibition laws. Courts have declared one unconstitutional and unenforceable and the other partially unconstitional and unenforceable.
18 states expressly prohibit abortion coverage in state insurance exchanges: AL, AZ, FL, ID, IN, KS, LA, MS, MO, NE, OH, OK, SC, SD, TN, UT, VA, WI.
15 states prohibit abortion coverage for public employees: AZ, AR, CO, IL, KS, KY, MA, MS, NE, NC, OH, PA, RI, SC, VA.
Massachusetts’ insurance prohibition for state employees applies only to coverage for certain procedures after viability.
???....it's already become the law.....but it certainly isn't rare or new....
http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/what-is-choice/fast-facts/issues-insurance-prohibition.html
The difference is insurance paid for by the taxpayers and private insurance which is what they sound like they are trying to control...
"The initiative would require that all health plans — not just plans under the Affordable Care Act — be stripped of any abortion coverage"
Its a little ambiguous in the article....taxpayers should have a right to dictate coverage THEY pay for....but to control private coverage is likely un-constitutional.
Rape insurance? What fresh hell is this in the latest conservative battle against women?I thought they topped themselves with "creepy Uncle Sam", boy was I wrong.
"A legislative ballot initiative to ban abortion coverage in health insurance plans and require women to buy what opponents call “rape insurance” was approved by Michigan’s Secretary of State this week and is expected by many to become law because it cannot be vetoed by Gov. Rick Snyder (R).
On Monday, the Michigan Secretary of State certified that the group Michigan Right to Life had enough signature for the legislature to take up the measure. The group turned in 315,477 signatures, but only 258,088 — or 3 percent of the state’s voters — were needed. Snyder vetoed a similar bill last year, but Michigan’s constitution does not give him the authority to sign or veto legislative initiatives.
The initiative would require that all health plans — not just plans under the Affordable Care Act — be stripped of any abortion coverage, even in the cases of rape or incest. Women would have to purchase a separate rider to receive abortion coverage.
Because women could not purchase the coverage after they were raped, critics have referred to the rider as “rape insurance.”
“It’s not like, oh, I was raped and so now I’ll buy this rider,” Planned Parenthood Advocates of Michigan Director of Government Relations Meghan Groen told RH Reality Check. “Nobody is anticipating being a victim of crime.”
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/11/...-becoming-law-with-approval-of-4-2-of-voters/
and with such things the repugs hope to garner women voters...or are they just demonstrating how much they hate women
incredible
Maybe I'm misunderstanding something, if so feel free to explain. It sounds like the measure is going to be enacted without being put to a vote. Yes? No?
and with such things the repugs hope to garner women voters...or are they just demonstrating how much they hate women
incredible
It's not unconstitutional, especially for a state government. How on Earth would that be unconstitutional?
Are you to imply that ONLY men signed said petition?
Ok time to demand DICK insurance.
you put your dick in and someone gets pregnant then you have to pay a DICK fee to the state.
It means you have to pay for the kids you have forced to exist through shitty lwas designed to strip women on their rights to deside what happens to the very flesh inside their bodies.
DICK insurance coming to a state near you soon
Isn't that called child maintenance?