Taft2016
Verified User
It honestly isn't even worth it keeping them on the survey, they should just be lumped in with the high school graduates.
Translation: This statistic is an embarrassment to Democrats. Get rid of it, pronto!
It honestly isn't even worth it keeping them on the survey, they should just be lumped in with the high school graduates.
Keep your white trashTranslation: This statistic is an embarrassment to Democrats. Get rid of it, pronto!
Keep your white trash
We'll keep the professionals
So witty for a juco guySo, how many professionals haven't finished high school?
Those with only a grade school education are a tiny demographic mostly composed of minorities, who, of course, heavily vote for Obama. It honestly isn't even worth it keeping them on the survey, they should just be lumped in with the high school graduates. They're all equally mediocre, IMO.
Yes and you have consistently voted with the high school only crowd.The point is the consistency of that demographics vote in every election since 1992 to vote for democrats....
the other demographics percentages change with the election....sometimes for Dems, sometimes not....
the HS or less group is consistent in their support for Democrats....
The point is ....
Yes and you have consistently voted with the high school only crowd.
Yes and you have consistently voted with the high school only crowd.
I'd like to see either of those queers say that to my face! I guaran-damn-tee you that they would be singing soprano the rest of their miserable little lives!!!Not up to par with Poet but...
The brilliance of the posts by lefties is just awesome.....especially the homos....
Is this the usual attempt at a strawman argument ....?
The point of the data is not the percentage of the total votes, or how much value one group contributed as opposed to any other group...that is irrelevant.
Its irrelevant how much each group contributed to the total, that is not what the point being made.
it is gallup data showing the voter demographics and the voter choices of each demographic....
your argument is pointless....
nice try.....I'm not surprised you fooled the Dude so easily....but I thought christiefan was more intelligent.....
and you didn't even post a link to prove the strawman....and it IS a that.
Let's rock gay klansmanI'd like to see either of those queers say that to my face! I guaran-damn-tee you that they would be singing soprano the rest of their miserable little lives!!!
The point is the consistency of that demographics vote in every election since 1992 to vote for democrats....
the other demographics percentages change with the election....sometimes for Dems, sometimes not....
the HS or less group is consistent in their support for Democrats....
Without Conservatives, I bet. Because there is no such thing as a pro-life Democrat.And with Obama, we built a new, stronger coalition, that has a broader base than we've previously sought. It's funny you cut things off after 2008, the results in 2010 and 2012 would've been interesting as well.
That's not my understanding. A graduate student pursues a master's degree. A post-graduate pursues a doctorate.
The point is, they know what the point is.
There's nothing they can say about it. So they have to either run off on tangents or use ad hominens.
Maineman, as predicted, beat a hasty retreat.
I take any poll with a grain of salt, and Gallup, like Rasmussen, leans right. The only person I'd pay serious attention to is Nate Silver.