Guess What? The ‘Knockout Game’ Is America’s Latest Phony Panic

"Knockout Game" Trend Responsible for 7 Deaths
Tell those dead people its nothing to worry about.
Its only black thugs having fun.:fu:you

Are you black or stupid...more likely black and stupid

If they want to do this shit, go knock each other out!”

"Knockout Game" Trend Responsible for 7 Deaths

How racist of you to say that
 
Here is the problem I have with all this.....There are certain white Americans who moan and groan about why blacks "play the race card" and look at what we see, white Americans painting every black American who is young as a thug, because they wear a hoodie. Now, if we are on a level of generalizations people can say the same about not feeling comfortable around a disheveled white kid for fear of him pulling out an assault rifle in a crowded theater. I really see racist on this board and I'm sorry I don't worry about poet or evince, I worry about the several plus people who tend to outnumber two individuals who are making racist remarks.

It's quite annoying that you guys are making generalizations.
 
well it is black males committing the crimes

as far as the media is concerned they are doing just the opposite only reporting it as teenagers which doesn't give us insight into who is really doing it.

Yes, white folk can be thuggish, but I don't see any reports of whites doing this. It is like seeing reports of Christians flying airplanes into buildings while screaming JESUS RULES

Actually there are several white kids that have been arrested for the same thing
 
Al Sharpton has fallen victim to an urban myth.....

If he believes the lies that this is a growing trend perpetrated only by blacks and only against whites then yes he has. If he believes there is a localized and isolated problem in New York, then maybe not.

Colin Flaherty sounds just like some of our posters. Anybody that buys anything that WorldNutDaily is selling without independent verification is about as bright as the idiot that post his spam emails to the board without checking them first.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/11/25/why_the_knockout_game_trend_is_a_myth.html


An important clarification: the game definitely exists, and has been around for at least a couple of years. I'm not claiming the game doesn't exist. But the idea that it's reached epidemic levels, or that it's only being played by young black people, is a fallacy. As Alan Noble convincingly writes, "Analyzing data is not as simple as watching some YouTube videos and Googling 'knockout game.'" And when it comes to the knockout game's supposed popularity, the data is almost entirely anecdotal:


Here’s the fascinating thing about this “spreading” trend: nobody seems to have any evidence that it’s spreading, or that it’s new, or that it’s racially motivated, or that black youths are the ones typically responsible, or that whites are typically targeted. This hasn’t stopped Mark Steyn, Thomas Sowell, and Matt Walsh from describing this specifically as a crime committed by blacks against whites, CNN from claiming that it is “spreading,” or Alec Torres at NRO from say it is “evidently increasing [in] popularity.”

This is precisely the type of story meant to animate the deepest recesses of our lizard brains—"Danger lurks around every corner! Identify your enemy!" At the epicenter of this narrative is Colin Flaherty, a writer for WorldNetDaily who probably has a Google alert set up for "black suspect." He's made it his life's work to report any single crime perpetrated by a black person in the U.S. against a white person. In a recent blog post, he lists as evidence six separate crimes in Philadelphia over the course of two years, which share nothing in similarity except for the fact that they involved black people.


Imagine if another national "journalist" started doing the same for, say, any crime committed in Alabama, or any arson charge in the country. People would start to think Alabama was going through a crime epidemic, or that arson was becoming all the rage with criminals. That would be ridiculous, because it's ridiculous to assume that a few unrelated counts of arson make arson an epidemic. But when you inject race into the equation, it conveniently aligns with the assumptions of people who happen to be racist. That's the sort of twisted logic that justifies why more than half of the U.S. prison population is made up by black and Hispanic people, even though they comprise a quarter of the total population.


Crime happens to every type of person, and is perpetrated by every type of person. What makes the false narrative of the knockout game—or any "black mob violence" story—crop up every year is the fact that some people will always believe the color of someone's skin predisposes him to commit a crime. When a few YouTube videos are able to convince terrified white folks that young black people are dangerous, they may as well assume that all cats can play the keyboard.
 
Here is the problem I have with all this.....There are certain white Americans who moan and groan about why blacks "play the race card" and look at what we see, white Americans painting every black American who is young as a thug, because they wear a hoodie. Now, if we are on a level of generalizations people can say the same about not feeling comfortable around a disheveled white kid for fear of him pulling out an assault rifle in a crowded theater. I really see racist on this board and I'm sorry I don't worry about poet or evince, I worry about the several plus people who tend to outnumber two individuals who are making racist remarks.

It's quite annoying that you guys are making generalizations.
And I'm really over the generalizations, stereotyping, and blanket indictments. Blacks and browns don't play any cards, least of all, any "imagined race card". One cannot play a card, to one's advantage, that everyone can see coming from a block away. Certain whites suggest that it's a reality as they are loathe to take responsibility for their own racism and prejudice, and would rather shift the blame onto blacks, whom they feel see racism behind every hood, rope and tree. We didn't just imagine racism, as being central to the Trayvon Martin murder. We experience it all the time....minding our own businesses, and being suspected of perpetually being "up to no good". Don't think we are not walking around thinking that "some whites" for some, and "most whites" for others, are up to "meaning no good".
Zimmerman is the only one who thinks he is white, obviously, because his Jewish judge father told him so, and so he did the "white thing" (reminiscent of O. J. Simpson, who got to thinking he was honorary "white"), narcissist that he is....and got him a "white wife", abused her, and moved onto the blond white girlfriend....except while he killed a black youth and got away with it...he got a rude awakening, when he decided to get physical and threatening with a
"white woman", who wasn't about to put up with the same shit his wife was willing to put up with. His "imagined" white privilege just evaporated. And now he is being treated like what he really is....."just another Mexican".
 
Because minorities are the usual victims of hate crimes. Duh.

Which is basically my point, and which is apparently not getting through your extra-dense sub-Saharan peter-puffing cranium.

When black criminals target non-black victims -be it old white ladies for the knockout game or Chinese take-out delivery guys on bicycles- these incidents are rarely classified as hate crimes, even though the victims are selected on the basis of race.

http://articles.mcall.com/2005-05-03/news/3607632_1_hate-crime-double-standards-white-girls

This particular incident was covered in local papers, but the majors in NYC (Times, Post, Daily News) wouldn't touch it (which is why it's hard to find links for)... until local whites pressured the NYPD to classify this incident as a bias incident. Initially, the NYPD refused to classify it as such:

It told of "a particularly vile incident" in a Brooklyn park, where two dozen black girls attacked six white girls because the whites were playing basketball on a public court that the blacks wanted to use. Two of the white girls were hospitalized.

"Imagine a role reversal: Two dozen white girls attacking a half-dozen black girls," the Post editorial said. "Al Sharpton would have dislocated a hip in his haste to get to the scene. And the police almost certainly would have filed hate-crime charges."

Police charged the attackers only with simple assault, but city lawyers said charges had to be re-filed under New York's hate-crime law. "We're not great fans of that statute," the editorial said. "Crimes of violence should be adjudicated on the basis of physical facts, not a state of mind."

I have said the same thing, as recently as last May, when I criticized new "gender identity" provisions in Pennsylvania's ethnic intimidation law.

Now, hate crimes can be defined if a victim is targeted by "actual or perceived" bias aimed at sexual orientation, race or whatever. That, I said, creates "thought police" who can prosecute people "regardless of whether that motivation actually exists."

That problem is compounded if hate-crime laws are not applied on a color-blind basis.

And you lie. Hate crime designation was instituted to deter whites from committing violent crime based on hate.

That's very honest of you. Evidently blacks remain free to commit violent race-based crime until their little hearts are content.

But I don't lie.... hate crimes were passed to pacify minorities. It wouldn't do to have them classified as the #1 offenders in their own special-interest crime category.

In creating this law, a crime was invented that only whites can commit.
 
Last edited:
Which is basically my point, and which is apparently not getting through your extra-dense sub-Saharan peter-puffing cranium.

.

Ignoring your blather, let me address your racist insult.
My I.Q. clocks in at 126-130, which is at least 50 points higher that yours. Sub-Saharan???? My ancestry includes English, French, Spanish, Native American as well as African. Peter puffing? You mean like what your mother did to keep hominy on your table as a kid? Bitch, let me put you on ignore, now, before I get banned again.
 
Ignoring your blather, let me address your racist insult.

Translation: "I'm free to call you a racist and liar, but you can't insult me. Furthermore, I have nothing to say to everything else you posted so I'm going to lock in the discussion on this tangent."

Bitch, let me put you on ignore, now, before I get banned again.

Wise move. You can't handle this.
 
lol...you're the one with the thread calling it a myth....Sharpton is speaking out against a myth.....


You are such a boring douche. You never read anything from your opponents in an attempt to understand it. You only look for ways to misrepresent it. You constantly focus in on trying to take things out of context and change the meaning. If you bothered to read past the headline, which I know is asking a lot for a pea brained moron like yourself, you would see that what the author was referring to as a myth was the idea of this as a a racially motivated, black on white and spreading trend. Quit being such a pansy and address the actual arguments rather than silly strawmen.


I swear to God you and that idiot ditzy are clones. The only difference is that you are more brief in your useless posts and thank you for that.
 
And I'm really over the generalizations, stereotyping, and blanket indictments. Blacks and browns don't play any cards, least of all, any "imagined race card". One cannot play a card, to one's advantage, that everyone can see coming from a block away. Certain whites suggest that it's a reality as they are loathe to take responsibility for their own racism and prejudice, and would rather shift the blame onto blacks, whom they feel see racism behind every hood, rope and tree. We didn't just imagine racism, as being central to the Trayvon Martin murder. We experience it all the time....minding our own businesses, and being suspected of perpetually being "up to no good". Don't think we are not walking around thinking that "some whites" for some, and "most whites" for others, are up to "meaning no good".
Zimmerman is the only one who thinks he is white, obviously, because his Jewish judge father told him so, and so he did the "white thing" (reminiscent of O. J. Simpson, who got to thinking he was honorary "white"), narcissist that he is....and got him a "white wife", abused her, and moved onto the blond white girlfriend....except while he killed a black youth and got away with it...he got a rude awakening, when he decided to get physical and threatening with a
"white woman", who wasn't about to put up with the same shit his wife was willing to put up with. His "imagined" white privilege just evaporated. And now he is being treated like what he really is....."just another Mexican".

Thanks for once again proving that you're nothing more, then a race baiter and a racist.
 
Ignoring your blather, let me address your racist insult.
My I.Q. clocks in at 126-130, which is at least 50 points higher that yours. Sub-Saharan???? My ancestry includes English, French, Spanish, Native American as well as African. Peter puffing? You mean like what your mother did to keep hominy on your table as a kid? Bitch, let me put you on ignore, now, before I get banned again.

Just unable to control yourself; HUH!!
 
lol...you're the one with the thread calling it a myth....Sharpton is speaking out against a myth.....

He was addressing conventional wisdom. I believe it to be a myth. One or two incidences, being fanned to flames, by folks with an agenda...to further demonize black youth, not getting the desired result from the Trayvon Martin debacle.
 
you would see that what the author was referring to as a myth was the idea of this as a a racially motivated, black on white and spreading trend.

which the fuckingidiot tried to do by pointing out its a racially motivated, black on white crime that's really been happening for a long, long time.....
 
Back
Top