Pro lifers show no mercy

No no. I'm not the one that *picked out three main reasons* to allow that murder of the fetus: rape, incest, mother's life in danger.

*I* let the woman choose any reason OR option.

I"m not saying you're wrong to oppose it for those reasons, I'm saying that by doing so, you are admitting that the rights of the fetus are not equal to those of the woman. Because you have yet to come up with any examples where it's ok to murder children (by definition 'born'), or adults for that matter, in order to save a woman from mental anguish, terrible health consequences, or death.

I know what you're saying.....its silly but I hear it......where we differ is that I'm not willing to let the mother kill her children on a whim like you are......
 
You CHOOSE to personify these bundles of tissue that nature itself often decides to discard.

and you choose to classify a living human as a bundle of tissue......nature sometimes decides to discard 80 year olds as well.....we don't use that as an excuse to off them for our convenience.....
 
Again?

Then, as most pro-lifers concede, how is it ok to 'murder' the 'baby' in cases of rape, incest, or if woman's life is in danger? (pro-lifer terminology in quotes.)

Really, we've covered this, ad infinitem. I know it kills you to face it but man up and admit it. Or revert back to your politician shilling.
????....you know it kills me to give you a perfectly rational answer which you repeatedly ignore?......annoys me, maybe.....doesn't kill me......
 
I know what you're saying.....its silly but I hear it......where we differ is that I'm not willing to let the mother kill her children on a whim like you are......

It shows how little you value you women and their rights when you think that an abortion and the decision to have one is 'a whim.' As the pro-lifer Truth Detector posted, most women have abortions to preserve their futures.....getting more education, developing jobs/careers, maintaining healthy relationships (cuz bad relationships create dysfunctional families and abused kids), or they cant afford them and need to do something irresponsible to survive....like take public assistance.

Thankfully, the law does NOT allow you to decide that a woman has to sacrifice all that...even tho apparently you believe you have the right to do so.

That, and the fact that you still irrationally refer to 'children' when the bearer does not.
 
It shows how little you value you women and their rights when you think that an abortion and the decision to have one is 'a whim.'

do you distinguish based on motive when you say a woman should be free to kill her unborn children?......less than 5% of abortions have anything to do with rape, incest, or the health of the mother, yet that is the only thing you want to talk about.......
 
I would ask the same question about people who think abortion should be legal.....why should someone have to tell you its wrong to kill your unborn child?......

Because I dont waste irrational and unnatural emotions on the developing tissue inside women that may never even be born, it's quite clear to me why it should be illegal for other people to tell a woman what to do with her body.

Unless you can tell us how to remove that lump of cells without infringing on many of her rights, and you have already admitted that her rights supersede those of the fetus, you cannot Constitutionally make her conform to your personal wishes. Move to Ireland...maybe you'll be happy there where abortion is illegal.
 
.getting more education

is it impossible to get an education while you're pregnant?......why would you think getting pregnant is going to prevent it?.......the maximum sacrifice the woman will have to undergo is the nine months between getting pregnant and putting the child up for adoption......most women aren't even aware they are pregnant for the first one or two months......lets make it seven......
 
Back
Top