Should all drugs be legalized?

Should all drugs be legalized?

  • Yes because we need the tax income

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes because the government should get off our backs

    Votes: 2 22.2%
  • Yes because enforcement is futile and racist

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 7 77.8%

  • Total voters
    9
Yet you seem to be making the connection here. How does making it illegal help? As murder is an action against somebody else, while drugs are something you do to yourself the "crimes" are not the "same thing". Is it the government's place to protect you from your own decisions?

But who ends up paying for this, taxpayers
 
Is that the rationale of statutes prohibiting the manufacture, cultivation, sale, possession, or use of all drugs?
don't know, don't care. the only power that the government has over it is in the commerce. personal manufacture, possession, and use is beyond their constitutional authority.
 
don't know, don't care. the only power that the government has over it is in the commerce. personal manufacture, possession, and use is beyond their constitutional authority.

How many statutes prohibiting personal manufacture, possession, and use have been successfully challenged on those grounds?
 
So, you would rather pay for prisons, police to enforce drug laws, and trials, prosecutors, etc?

No I would rather they not use drugs, how is that, if they become addicted, chances are they aren't going to be able to work, then because in this case they lose their legs, we pay for medical, and psychological help in rehab, no thanks
 
I have never been able to understand why they can't just buy up all the poppies in Afghanistan and use it to make codeine, opium, morphine and heroin. It was Americans that turned much of Afghanistan into an infertile semi desert only suitable for poppy growing.
 
How many statutes prohibiting personal manufacture, possession, and use have been successfully challenged on those grounds?
the courts are wrong. rubber stamping laws based upon personal ideology instead of the limits of the constitution is modus operandi for the judicial system.
 
the courts are wrong. rubber stamping laws based upon personal ideology instead of the limits of the constitution is modus operandi for the judicial system.

Does your answer indicate that no statutes prohibiting personal manufacture, possession, and use have been successfully challenged on those grounds?
 
I have never been able to understand why they can't just buy up all the poppies in Afghanistan and use it to make codeine, opium, morphine and heroin. It was Americans that turned much of Afghanistan into an infertile semi desert only suitable for poppy growing.

I think the subsidy scheme has been tried, Tom.
 
No I would rather they not use drugs, how is that, if they become addicted, chances are they aren't going to be able to work, then because in this case they lose their legs, we pay for medical, and psychological help in rehab, no thanks

Yes, but not everyone is perfect like you, and the cost of rehabilitation and care is less then the cost of arrest, trial, and incareration.
 
Yes, but not everyone is perfect like you, and the cost of rehabilitation and care is less then the cost of arrest, trial, and incareration.

That is a B.S answer, so you are saying that because they couldn't control themselves I have to pay for it. That is not a very good position.
 
That is a B.S answer, so you are saying that because they couldn't control themselves I have to pay for it. That is not a very good position.

If it wasnt against the law, you wouldnt have to pay for the cops, prisons, courts.
 
Back
Top