Prove the US is lying about who used the chemical weapons on whom

This is NOT Iraq.

this is keeping the middle east dictators from thinking "hey I can murder the people I don't like with impunity"
 
You don't have feelings liebuttry you have a mix of confusion dashed with a complete lack of compassion for your fellow man.

Some sociopaths don't even know they are sociopaths
 
see what lies do bac.


Its why I stick to facts.


there are NO facts that show Obama is LYING about the intel like Bush obviously did

No, you are decidedly not sticking to facts on this issue, you're sticking to Obama. That's not the same.

I PROVED to you that Obama is a liar .. single payer, sequestration .. you ignored that.

I PROVED to you that there was no evidence of the rapes that Rice claimed, validated by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and US intel .. you ignored that too.

You are only interested in what puts the best face on your political choice.. thus, it is futile talking facts with you that you'll ignore.
 
see what lies do bac.


Its why I stick to facts.


there are NO facts that show Obama is LYING about the intel like Bush obviously did

Why don't you do a thread giving everyone choices on what percentage you are factual?
 
This is NOT Iraq.

this is keeping the middle east dictators from thinking "hey I can murder the people I don't like with impunity"

So you think the Saddam regime didn't rape murder and starve the people it didn't like? Do you forget he gassed the Kurds?

Again, are the people any less dead if the regime uses conventional bombs instead of gas? Are they any less dead if a 1000 bullets are used instead of gas?
 
So you think the Saddam regime didn't rape murder and starve the people it didn't like? Do you forget he gassed the Kurds?

Again, are the people any less dead if the regime uses conventional bombs instead of gas? Are they any less dead if a 1000 bullets are used instead of gas?

Very good point Superfreak, but I bet she's about to use some facts.

Get ready.

She may even use the word idiot.
 
This is NOT Iraq.

this is keeping the middle east dictators from thinking "hey I can murder the people I don't like with impunity"

like this did....
and_image_1326589316.jpg
 
This is NOT Iraq.

this is keeping the middle east dictators from thinking "hey I can murder the people I don't like with impunity"

well then you should have been for anything that happened in Iraq. What about the Kurds he gassed, and what about the rape rooms, and making political dissenters watch their families be tortured to get info?
 
Desh is right. Assad doesn't have the right to kill his citizens. Only we have the right to kill them.
 
I have seen NOTHING to prove what keeps being claimed by some on all sides.

Bring me the "facts" you people are using to stand against protecting a population from being gassed by their tyrant leader.
Yes, let's liberate them into the hands of even more murderous leaders. The Syrian rebel forces are led by Muslim Terrorist groups, primarily controlled by Al Qaeda. Do not let that stop you on your feel good mercy mission. Rebels win and they will slaughter more than a hundred thousand and even further enslave far more in an Islamic theocracy. You really haven't a clue do you?
 
This is NOT Iraq.

this is keeping the middle east dictators from thinking "hey I can murder the people I don't like with impunity"

And that wasn't Iraq. Seems like that was as much as what Iraq was about as anything....even if it wasn't sold as such.
 
It was reported by citizens on the ground.

It was a claim taken seriously until it was investigated.

The investigators themselves said not having the evidence to PROVE it was happening doesnt mean it didn't take place

So NOT finding WMD in Iraq, doesn't mean they were never there.
Thanks :)
 
No, you are decidedly not sticking to facts on this issue, you're sticking to Obama. That's not the same.

I PROVED to you that Obama is a liar .. single payer, sequestration .. you ignored that.

I PROVED to you that there was no evidence of the rapes that Rice claimed, validated by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and US intel .. you ignored that too.

You are only interested in what puts the best face on your political choice.. thus, it is futile talking facts with you that you'll ignore.

Soldiers in Sierrea Leone used to bet of the sex of a foetus by cutting it out of the mother, you can thank your demi-god Ghaddafi for that.

In their confusion stuck in juju practices, the RUF amputated Sierra Leoneans limbs, turned girls into prostitutes, looted diamonds, fire-bombed properties, practiced cannibalism, and frequently carved the initials "RUF" on their child soldiers' chest. RUF officers rubbed cocaine into the open cuts on their troops to make them maniacal and fearless, and for entertainment, some RUF soldiers bet on the sex of an unborn baby and then sliced open a pregnant woman's womb to determine the winner.
http://www.leoneclub.org/index.php/news/news/116-why-the-african-politician-cannot-be-juju-dabbler
 
So you think the Saddam regime didn't rape murder and starve the people it didn't like? Do you forget he gassed the Kurds?

Again, are the people any less dead if the regime uses conventional bombs instead of gas? Are they any less dead if a 1000 bullets are used instead of gas?

Hmm... I keep seeing that "any less dead" question. Dying from chemical weapons would be painful and drawn out. An explosion might be a quicker and less painful way to go compared to chemical attacks. Bullets also might be more humane than chemicals.

I think I would honestly have to answer that there is a difference. Dying is "less dead" than dead.

I think it's time to retire that question. It's not making sense in my opinion.
The distinction comes down to suffering.
 
Like Saddam?


dear idiot how many decades did your team wait to "police" Sadam for that infraction?


then you have to face who sold Sadam the very shit to do it with.

Ronny rayguns KNEW Sadam gassed people you fucking fool after he sold them to him
 
Back
Top