Emmett Till / Trayvon Martin - An Awakening to Racist Evil in America

[christiefan915]

I found her comments to Anderson Cooper even more disturbing
“I don’t think it’s really racial. I think it’s just the everyday life, the type of life that they live, and how they’re living, in the environment that they’re living in,” she told Cooper, using “they” to refer to black people, specifically Trayvon and a female friend of his who testified during the Zimmerman trial about being on the phone with him just before the fight.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...us-fbi-report-article-1.1399001#ixzz2ZFEYQK6X

She also called him a boy of color.

A "boy of color", jeebus.

 

[Cancel 2016.11]

Well, no. If you killed the person he can't testify whether he was following or stalking. It'd be your word against nobody's.

You know, I meant to respond to that idiotic point yesterday, and never did.

I literally LOL'd when I read it.

Exactly. These morons don't get that because Martin is dead, there is no one to say what happened other than Zimmerman.

That's why you use two bullets. No one to counter when you shakingly testify about how you were attacked. Could happen. The bitches could start arming themselves boys.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Let's break this down a little for you simple freak, since it is obviously above your logic curve.

Followers follow.

Stalkers carry a gun they are willing to fire while following.

Get it?

No need to answer.

I know you get it, but your arrogance and dishonsesty will never allow you to admit it.

LMAO... so you just make shit up? Yeah, tell me again who is being dishonest.

 

[Cancel 2016.11]

A "boy of color", jeebus.

Oh anyone who reads that interview, who listens to it, and denies she's a stone-cold racist, is a liar.

A stone cold racist found Zimmerman not-guilty.

But they have no problem with that either.

That's what makes them racist. Well, that and a lot of other stuff.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

<snip>

100% irrelevant.

What you call reasonable doubt, I call shady lawyering.

No, it is not irrelevant. How often to do we hear about the call for justice for those young black men who are killed by other young black men? No, we only hear about it when the young black man is killed by someone of a different race. In this case by an Hispanic man.

Can you honestly say the prosecution made its case beyond a reasonable doubt? That is what they are required by law to do.

 

[blackascoal]

So both the prosecution and defense approved of the jury before hand, but NOW you claim they are corrupt because you did not like the verdict?

Yeah... you are quite the dishonest little hack aren't you?

No, you're quite the fool dude. White privilege is all that's important to you .. which makes you the fool.

I say again, YOU would have supported the Till verdict .. and YOU would have claimed the verdict was all the proof needed that racism was not at the core of it.

You exhibit no ability to think critically. The long and nasty racist history in Sanford doesn't even factor in your thoughts .. if it did, you'd have the answers to the questions you ask .. but don't really want answered.

Your inability to think critically has indeed been quite surprising .. but it's your bed.

 

[evince]

hell the don't believe the one person living who told them what she heard simply because she was black.


a racist roundtable of braindead scum

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

We didn't "decide" he was guilty, he IS guilty. He took a life. What we're angry about is that he wasn't punished for taking a life.

Yes, he took a life. Yes, he acted foolishly. But there was reasonable doubt as to whether or not it was self defense or murder. If it was self defense, while tragic still, it is not punishable under the law. If it was murder, it must be proven beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to make the case that it was murder beyond a reasonable doubt.

This doesn't mean there aren't racial disparities within our justice system, there are. The poor go to jail more often than the wealthy. Minorities are more likely to receive longer/harsher sentences. Many put on death row have been found to be innocent.

Sometimes there isn't enough evidence to put someone away who we know is guilty. I don't think you or anyone else would suggest we change the reasonable doubt standard. So what do we do?

 

[blackascoal]

Um... BAC ALSO STATED that we were racists, simply because we disagree with him on whether Zimmerman should have been put in jail under the law and whether or not the prosecution made its case. BAC also stated that Lorax would have supported the Till verdict... BASED ON NOTHING BUT HIS OWN HATE.

You know what that is right? HATE.

The same type of vile crap that Desh has been saying. But you want to pretend that we are saying he is full of hate for wanting to fight at the ballot box? You know what that is? DISHONEST.

:0) WOW .. talk about DISHONEST.

I've never said ONCE that you're a racist simply because you disagree with me.

You are a racist because you support further denigration and terrorism against black people in Florida. This case and decision are the true voices of your character and lack of a soul .. and white privilege is screaming out the loudest.

How else do you ignore the history of racism and racist court decisions, not just throughout Florida, but specifically to Sanford, Florida? How?

C'mon .. tell me that doesn't matter .. then walk over to a mirror and take a look at a racist..

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

No, you're quite the fool dude. White privilege is all that's important to you .. which makes you the fool.

No, that is simply what you wish to project onto me because you are angry with the verdict. One day I hope you realize that. If not, so be it, out of my hands.

I say again, YOU would have supported the Till verdict .. and YOU would have claimed the verdict was all the proof needed that racism was not at the core of it.

That is your anger speaking. I in no way would have supported that verdict. You simply wish to paint me as a racist because it makes you feel better.

You exhibit no ability to think critically. The long and nasty racist history in Sanford doesn't even factor in your thoughts .. if it did, you'd have the answers to the questions you ask .. but don't really want answered.

That is again nonsense. You are speaking from emotion, not the facts of the case as presented to the jury. I don't think you could honestly say that the prosecution made its case.

you continue trying to tell me what I have and have not thought of... I would be curious to know... are you psychic?

Your inability to think critically has indeed been quite surprising .. but it's your bed.

I am not the one failing to think critically. I know I am the 'enemy' to you right now, but the door remains open for friendship should you ever change your mind.

 

[evince]

Yes, he took a life. Yes, he acted foolishly. But there was reasonable doubt as to whether or not it was self defense or murder. If it was self defense, while tragic still, it is not punishable under the law. If it was murder, it must be proven beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to make the case that it was murder beyond a reasonable doubt.

This doesn't mean there aren't racial disparities within our justice system, there are. The poor go to jail more often than the wealthy. Minorities are more likely to receive longer/harsher sentences. Many put on death row have been found to be innocent.

Sometimes there isn't enough evidence to put someone away who we know is guilty. I don't think you or anyone else would suggest we change the reasonable doubt standard. So what do we do?

sometimes cops don't do an investigation because they just trust what the perp said

 

[Phantasmal]

I heard a lawyer say it ended up with Trayvon being prosecuted and I have to agree with that. "Blame the victim" worked out really well for the defense. I think we could have tried that case better than the prosecutors.

I would have asked the so-called forensic expert to explain why there wasn't a drop of blood on GZ after he shot Trayvon while Trayvon was on top of him. I'd ask the store clerk to testify if Trayvon was "acting funny, like he was on drugs". I'd ask experts to explain why there was blood but no swelling on GZ's head, if his head was being bashed against concrete repeatedly. If defense brought up something in Trayvon's past that was negative, I'd bring up corresponding facts about GZ that were negative. The biggest thing I don't understand is why these people are so sure GZ was telling the absolute truth when very little of what he said could be proven. It's clear from the beginning GZ's nothing but a scared, lying weasel.

Absolutely, why no defensive wounds on Trayvon. I would have kept repeating the lies Zimmerman told in his interviews. The 2:06 lost minutes, where was he, what was he doing. Why wasn't Zimmerman trying to fight back?

I never would have allowed the juror in who called Trayvon a "boy of color" wtf? But sadly, maybe the six women they chose were the least racists in the town.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

:0) WOW .. talk about DISHONEST.

I've never said ONCE that you're a racist simply because you disagree with me.

LOL... that is precisely what you implied. I said the case was not made by the prosecution beyond a reasonable doubt. You then proclaimed I was a racist for thinking that way. I said Zimmerman followed Martin, you claimed he stalked him and that I was a racist for not thinking that.

You are a racist because you support further denigration and terrorism against black people in Florida.

Which is complete bullshit. In no way do I support that. You are simply making shit up.

This case and decision are the true voices of your character and lack of a soul .. and white privilege is screaming out the loudest.

Yet there was not a white man involved in the altercation between Zimmerman and Martin.

How else do you ignore the history of racism and racist court decisions throughout Florida, but specifically to Sanford, Florida? How?

I have not once stated that I was unaware of the history in Florida. But that history does not change what the prosecution in THIS case failed to do. Did they do it on purpose? I don't know. Does the racism in Sanford only apply to certain minorities?

C'mon .. tell me that doesn't matter .. then walk over to a mirror and take a look at a racist..

I feel sorry for you man.

 

[blackascoal]

Sometimes there isn't enough evidence to put someone away who we know is guilty. I don't think you or anyone else would suggest we change the reasonable doubt standard. So what do we do?

People of conscience speak to the truth of it. They protest loudly against incidents of overt racism through every vehicle available to them.

They DON'T just go along to get along .. and they DON'T agree with racist verdicts.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

hell the don't believe the one person living who told them what she heard simply because she was black.


a racist roundtable of braindead scum

by your standards you are racist for not believing Zimmerman because he is Hispanic.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

People of conscience speak to the truth of it. They protest loudly against incidents of overt racism through every vehicle available to them.

They DON'T just go along to get along .. and they DON'T agree with racist verdicts.

There is no question that morally Zimmerman was in the wrong. But legally, can you honestly tell me that the prosecution made its case beyond a reasonable doubt?

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Absolutely, why no defensive wounds on Trayvon. I would have kept repeating the lies Zimmerman told in his interviews. The 2:06 lost minutes, where was he, what was he doing. Why wasn't Zimmerman trying to fight back?

I never would have allowed the juror in who called Trayvon a "boy of color" wtf? But sadly, maybe the six women they chose were the least racists in the town.

If that was the case, could the prosecution not requested a change of venue?

 

[blackascoal]

I have not once stated that I was unaware of the history in Florida. But that history does not change what the prosecution in THIS case failed to do. Did they do it on purpose? I don't know. Does the racism in Sanford only apply to certain minorities?

That's all I needed to hear from you .. exactly as I said you would do.

But I bet you didn't take that walk to the mirror.

Thanks for playing.

 

[evince]

yeah everyone know judges kids get off


its the best system super duper can think of

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

That's all I needed to hear from you .. exactly as I said you would do.

But I bet you didn't take that walk to the mirror.

Thanks for playing.

Sorry... but you are simply full of shit. You are bound and determined to label everyone who disagrees with you as a racist. That is quite sad.