Biblical Marriage Not Defined Simply As One Man, One Woman: Iowa Religious Scholars'

honestly if we can kill goats for food, and we can fondle their goat breasts and steal their milk from them, then we should be able to have sex with them too. Always thought that "animals can't consent" line of logic is pretty fucking stupid. You are basically sexually assaulting a goat every time you try and get goat milk.

Animals don't consent to most things we do to them. We invade their space and bodies all the time, and we kill them. Animals aren't people, they have small brains and aren't sentient.

Say yes to proposition 28 - goat sex.

This proves you are mentally unbalanced.
 
You don't care what my marriage looks like as long as they don't qualify for health care.

obviously....for me, that's the "footprint" of whether the law impacts me or not.....does the government make me do something I find objectionable......you are free to be a fucking idiot for all I care so long as I remain free to not pay any attention to you......so do what you want in your home.....just stop bringing into the county courthouse....
 
Hush, truth! He completely goes off the deep end, by claiming his opinion (and interpretation) of The Bible and scripture as sacrosanct, when it is anything but. I went to a parochial Episcopal Boys Choir School for 3 years, where we sang liturgical music, 6 days out of 7, studied Latin and Religion as academic courses, and attended a Catholic Christian Brothers High School, St. Mel, in Chicago for a year, and celebrated mass as an acolyte, 5 days out of 7. I dare say, that I have spent more times in a church, during those 4 years, than he has in his entire life.

forgive me o Master for not being a Scotch Christian.....lol.....maybe you spent a lot of time in Church.....maybe you spent a whole lot of time with a priest.....however, when you tell us you refuse to read the Bible because its wrong you admit everything you need to tell us about your religion......
 
forgive me o Master for not being a Scotch Christian.....lol.....maybe you spent a lot of time in Church.....maybe you spent a whole lot of time with a priest.....however, when you tell us you refuse to read the Bible because its wrong you admit everything you need to tell us about your religion......
Your bigoted implication aside....whatever gave you the idea that I refuse to read the Bible. I have read the Bible...profusely. I simply don't interpret scripture the way you do. My prerogative. The Bible isn't necessarily wrong...some interpretation of it, is. Your problem lies in the fact that you cannot prove yourself right about what you believe. It's open to interpretation. LOL
 
obviously....for me, that's the "footprint" of whether the law impacts me or not.....does the government make me do something I find objectionable......you are free to be a fucking idiot for all I care so long as I remain free to not pay any attention to you......so do what you want in your home.....just stop bringing into the county courthouse....
Really? Well what is preventing you from "not paying me any attention", because I would relish it, actually??
 
Your bigoted implication aside....whatever gave you the idea that I refuse to read the Bible. I have read the Bible...profusely. I simply don't interpret scripture the way you do. My prerogative. The Bible isn't necessarily wrong...some interpretation of it, is. Your problem lies in the fact that you cannot prove yourself right about what you believe. It's open to interpretation. LOL


exactly......Your problem, Poet, lies in the fact that you cannot prove yourself right about what you believe. LOL
 
Poor poet, surrounded by racists, bigots, sexists, and homophobes. Or at least that's his excuse for lacking reason and personal responsibility...
 
Really? Well what is preventing you from "not paying me any attention", because I would relish it, actually??

lol....yet you had to PM me when I posted on a thread you had been banned from.......how is that not relishing attention......
 
Re: Biblical Marriage Not Defined Simply As One Man, One Woman: Iowa Religious

no it doesn't....we've already posted it to the thread.....everyone knows your lying about it......what's your point?......


Posted what? I cited the passage early on and anyone can go look it up. He talks of eunuchs that were made that way by their own choice or not and says that those who can accept it should do it.
 
Milking an animal is not a sex act.

never said it was. I was using that as an example of how we don't care much for the consent of animals for doing something that if done to a human, would usually be sexual assault.

we are not AS concerned with the interests of a goat.

right . . . that's kinda my overarching point. So why draw the line at sex? We already do many other things animals don't consent to.

Frankly, I really don't see a great need for laws against bestiality, outside of Ohio, but the laws in no way violate the constitution.

do you just type to listen to yourself speak or something? I don't think you really disagreed with anything I said. I never asserted that those laws violated the constitution.

Also a big part of my post was clearly hyperbole, for example, I don't actually support a fake proposition 28 to legalize goat sex.

Do I really have to point this stuff out?
 
Posted what? I cited the passage early on and anyone can go look it up. He talks of eunuchs that were made that way by their own choice or not and says that those who can accept it should do it.

I posted it....I will do it again....

11 Jesus replied, “Not everyone can accept this word, but only those to whom it has been given. 12 For there are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others—and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it.”

it doesn't say cut your balls off.....it says live LIKE eunuchs......not live AS eunuchs....so this is just another example of you lying to denigrate something you dislike......
 
maybe it was the time that I offered you a link to read the original text and you refused to read it......remember that?.....
Honey, get it straight. That wasn't me, refusing to "read the Bible"....that was me, balking at your piss poor defense of your position. I have several Bibles in my possession, which I read, from time to time. It is not necessary that I read your "text", in order to draw a conclusion, or render an interpretation. I'm not here to placate you. Remember that.
 
Back
Top