Can mainstream liberal fanaticism be reversed?

Steelplate said:
This whole THREAD is an ad hominem attack you idiot!

I have no fucking clue what "hatefucking" is....what? Another Facebook attack that you want to apply to all "libruls" again?
Click to expand...
Is it, against which individual?

Ad hominem is an attack on an individual, correct?

Ad hominem, Latin.

To the man.

Your attacks are ad Hom.
This thread is not.

You are a self proclaimed expert in retardation, is that from personal experience?

( that was an ad Hom question)!!
 
007 said:
You say so?
I don't believe you.
It fits the vicious intolerant nature of liberals to deny their true nature.
Click to expand...

I am sure there are some psychos on both sides. But if there is a side that promotes the equality and freedom of women, it would be the liberal side. That you can find some isolated lunatic that promotes violent hatred of women does not change that.
 
007 said:
So we must suffer the violence, the threats the threats against families and the mainstream liberal fanatics and totalitarian obamacultists won't tell us what they meen when they talk about hatefucking conservative women.

What exactly is HATEFUCKING?
Click to expand...


I would imagine it's what your wife has come to refer to as a typical night with you...
 
Last edited:
007 said:
Just seeking clarification of the liberal term "hatefucking" why do liberals not wish to share their wisdom.
They used the term, yet refuse to explain its meaning, perhaps they have something to hide?

Like the liberal war on women!
Click to expand...


Well ya see, we're waiting on you to prove the term is a "Liberal" one.

you keep claiming it is, but as everyone know, you can't be trusted to tell the truth.

So once you've gone out and PROVED your claim the debate can move forward.
 
Last edited:
Darla said:
"hate-fucking' is a disgusting term used by disgusting men. I believe it has been used on this board, though I am not certain. It is used by both conservative and liberal men. Liberal men sometimes feel they are immune to charges of sexism and find it funny to degrade conservative women by talking about how much they'd like to "hate fuck" one of them. This first came to my attention probably seven or eight years ago when a male blogger wrote a piece that went viral about Ann Coulter. I can't even write the name here it was that bad.

What 007 is on about is a story from the year 2009 (he is nothing if not current, I guess that's an english thing?) that some moron wrote in Playboy ( the very bastion of liberal intellectual thought), called "10 women I'd like to hate fuck".

It was roundly attacked by liberal feminists as the piece of shit it was.

Hate fucking is not a liberal term.
Click to expand...


OF COURSE it's not a liberal term.

But do you REALLY expect a lying little turd like 007 to admit as much?

You've read the sickening bullshit the little puke spreads all over these boards.
 
poet said:
http://www.forwardprogressives.com/its-time-to-tell-the-truth-republicans-arent-christians/

In the report, the young Republican activists acknowledge their party has suffered significant damage in recent years. A sampling of the critique on:
Gay marriage: “On the ‘open-minded’ issue … [w]e will face serious difficulty so long as the issue of gay marriage remains on the table.”
Hispanics: “Latino voters … tend to think the GOP couldn’t care less about them.”
Perception of the party’s economic stance: “We’ve become the party that will pat you on your back when you make it, but won’t offer you a hand to help you get there.”
Big reason for the image problem: The “outrageous statements made by errant Republican voices.”
Words that up-for-grabs voters associate with the GOP: “The responses were brutal: closed-minded, racist, rigid, old-fashioned.”
Click to expand...


I think this is the link you want and this report is really scathing but nothing in it that most of us didn't already know. This is why we won't see another Republican president for a long time.

The College Republican National Committee (CRNC) released yet another post mortem today. The report was focused on the reasons the Republicans lost the youth vote so badly.
Click to expand...


And to the get back to the thread. Whatever you want to call Liberalism, it's here to stay.

Ultimately the paper is a big fail because it fails to understand that the Republican Party does not have a messaging problem. It has a failed ideological problem. The Republican Party is supposed to be the Party that balances the country. The country is a Liberal country though most will not characterize themselves that way until one itemizes what most people want.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top