Liberalism: The most bigoted ideology of all!

the only thing the Left has proposed is to regulate arms that can cause a massacre.

Regulate them how? Please specify what regulation would have prevented Sandy Hook or Aurora?

Butter knives could be used to massacre people. Should we ban those too? What about peroxide and pressure cookers?

When has the style or type of weapon been responsible for a massacre?

Let's be honest, liberals want to ban certain weapons because they believe they can do this, where they don't believe they can ban ALL weapons. It's incrementalism at it's finest. The liberal argument is, fewer guns = less gun violence. Therefore, NO guns = NO gun violence, and this is the ultimate objective of the liberal philosophy, because nothing else makes rational sense. Keeping guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens does nothing to stop people from disobeying the law and using guns to commit violence.
 
He didn't need to. Intelligent, non-intentionally obtuse people knew exactly what he was saying. When I went into the Maine woods to hunt deer, I did not take a weapon of war. My ex-wife is an insurance agent and she has to go off into the boonies to strange client's homes all the time. She has a small handgun in her purse for personal protection. It is not a weapon of war.

Yep... I know exactly what he was saying, and it's the same thing as all liberals say. You want to ban all guns. That's the only way to ensure no one is harmed by a firearm, because criminals don't obey regulations and restrictions. Like I said, no liberal is going to come right out and tell us they advocate banning all guns, because they know it's not possible to do that. (I say, no liberal... but we have liberals here who advocate this daily. I mean politicians who are liberals.)
 
When Dixie - the guy who thinks you can't divide one into three equal pieces - starts blathering about one of his ideas being the only thing that makes rational sense, rational people need to quickly turn their heads to avoid spraying their computer monitor with whatever they happen to be drinking when they read it.
 
When Dixie - the guy who thinks you can't divide one into three equal pieces - starts blathering about one of his ideas being the only thing that makes rational sense, rational people need to quickly turn their heads to avoid spraying their computer monitor with whatever they happen to be drinking when they read it.

I refer you all to the title of the thread. I rest my case.
 
I refer you all to the title of the thread. I rest my case.

I'm not Left wing and your argument still fails.

Maybe since you have limited knowledge of politics and you submit yourself to a party you are always proven wrong and want to justify this by saying "The other person is bigoted."

Easy....heh
 
I refer you all to the title of the thread. I rest my case.
it is certainly not the hallmark of "BIGOTRY" to express an opinion concerning the overly argumentative, intentionally obtuse, willfully obstinant, foolishly bombastic, laughable behavior of one single individual who, for the past decade, has strutted around internet political chat sites passing himself off as a 21st century version of the old vaudvillian, Professor Irwin Corey (still alive, by the way), who billed himself as "The World's Greatest Authority". Pointing out your comical pathetic foibles is not bigoted, it is simply perceptive.
 
I'm not Left wing and your argument still fails.

Maybe since you have limited knowledge of politics and you submit yourself to a party you are always proven wrong and want to justify this by saying "The other person is bigoted."

Easy....heh

This has nothing to do with me. In the OP, I offered a challenge... go find the threads where conscientious liberals are understanding where their conservative counterparts are coming from, and offering to meet in the middle. You will not find any. On virtually every issue, the Liberal takes a liberal stance and defiantly refuses to budge from it. Meanwhile, the last two people conservatives offered up to run for president, literally bent over backwards to pander to moderates and offer compromise on liberal issues. Whether it's immigration reform, abortion, gay marriage, the right has been more than willing to find common ground and work out a solution, it is the left who remains defiant in their bigoted view that they are the only ones who are right, and the right is just wrong.
 
it is certainly not the hallmark of "BIGOTRY" to express an opinion concerning the overly argumentative, intentionally obtuse, willfully obstinant, foolishly bombastic, laughable behavior of one single individual who, for the past decade, has strutted around internet political chat sites passing himself off as a 21st century version of the old vaudvillian, Professor Irwin Corey (still alive, by the way), who billed himself as "The World's Greatest Authority". Pointing out your comical pathetic foibles is not bigoted, it is simply perceptive.

Again, you are totally unwilling to engage in a respectful debate of ideas and work toward a solution. Your posts prove this over and over again. You are a bigoted stubborn liberal who thinks he is right about everything, and to hell with anyone on the right and what they think. This manifests itself into little tirades like you just displayed, because it's the last refuge of the bigoted.
 
This has nothing to do with me. In the OP, I offered a challenge... go find the threads where conscientious liberals are understanding where their conservative counterparts are coming from, and offering to meet in the middle. You will not find any. On virtually every issue, the Liberal takes a liberal stance and defiantly refuses to budge from it. Meanwhile, the last two people conservatives offered up to run for president, literally bent over backwards to pander to moderates and offer compromise on liberal issues. Whether it's immigration reform, abortion, gay marriage, the right has been more than willing to find common ground and work out a solution, it is the left who remains defiant in their bigoted view that they are the only ones who are right, and the right is just wrong.

Are you stating that Liberals should stop taking a Liberal stance?

You do realize that Conservatives do the exact same thing (R)ight?

It's why I am "anti-party". People join the party they have the most in common with and justify the bad sides of that party in order to win. Welcome to politics.
 
Are you stating that Liberals should stop taking a Liberal stance?

You do realize that Conservatives do the exact same thing (R)ight?

It's why I am "anti-party". People join the party they have the most in common with and justify the bad sides of that party in order to win. Welcome to politics.

I have no problem with people taking a liberal stance, but if that means being a closed-minded intolerant bigot who can't even read what someone else posts, then no... they shouldn't be that. If it means they have a personal liberal view but accept that we live in a society with people who disagree with that view and have a valid reason for their disagreement, and if they understand that the only way to solve our problems is to understand where the other side is coming from, and that we have to reach compromise we can all live with... then yes, that's how they should be. No one has to abandon what they believe personally, but liberals have to accept that people disagree with them, and have valid arguments.

But the ideology of liberalism isn't conducive to this, you have an agenda, you think you are right, and you simply reject anything that contradicts your view. That's BIGOTRY at it's finest... thy name is Liberalism!
 
I have no problem with people taking a liberal stance, but if that means being a closed-minded intolerant bigot who can't even read what someone else posts, then no... they shouldn't be that. If it means they have a personal liberal view but accept that we live in a society with people who disagree with that view and have a valid reason for their disagreement, and if they understand that the only way to solve our problems is to understand where the other side is coming from, and that we have to reach compromise we can all live with... then yes, that's how they should be. No one has to abandon what they believe personally, but liberals have to accept that people disagree with them, and have valid arguments.

But the ideology of liberalism isn't conducive to this, you have an agenda, you think you are right, and you simply reject anything that contradicts your view. That's BIGOTRY at it's finest... thy name is Liberalism!

You are new to politics :)

Most Lefties are more aware of the beliefs of the Right than the Righties are of the Left. Righties have no clue what the Left thinks/wants. That's a fact.
 
You are new to politics :)

Most Lefties are more aware of the beliefs of the Right than the Righties are of the Left. Righties have no clue what the Left thinks/wants. That's a fact.

LOL.. New to politics? That's funny... but again, it's a liberal bigot's attempt to ridicule instead of debate intellectually.
 
Most Lefties are more aware of the beliefs of the Right than the Righties are of the Left.

And most bigots claim to be aware of their detractors beliefs as well. It has nothing to do with the point. As I said in my OP, which you should take the time to read, it's not that long... On every single left-right issue, we see the left painting the right as crazy and extreme, while their view is the only 'reasonable' view to have. This is what BIGOTS do.

It does not matter what the issue is... Liberals refuse to budge, and refuse to accept any other idea or suggestion, preferring to denigrate and trash their opponent with patent lies and false rhetoric. When the Liberals obtain power, whether it's at the local level, state level, or national level, they promptly shut down all debate from the opposition and institute their policies. They cram their liberal garbage down our throats as fast as they can, and keep on truckin'!

If you are arguing with a liberal, you are arguing with a total bigot. They do not recognize your viewpoint as valid, they believe their viewpoint is superior, and there is nothing you can ever say to change their perspective because they are bigots.
 
I have no problem with people taking a liberal stance, but if that means being a closed-minded intolerant bigot who can't even read what someone else posts, then no... they shouldn't be that. If it means they have a personal liberal view but accept that we live in a society with people who disagree with that view and have a valid reason for their disagreement, and if they understand that the only way to solve our problems is to understand where the other side is coming from, and that we have to reach compromise we can all live with... then yes, that's how they should be. No one has to abandon what they believe personally, but liberals have to accept that people disagree with them, and have valid arguments.

But the ideology of liberalism isn't conducive to this, you have an agenda, you think you are right, and you simply reject anything that contradicts your view. That's BIGOTRY at it's finest... thy name is Liberalism!

This is just a crock.

You really just type stuff. There is no basis, no evidence, no facts - you just type stuff.
 
Yep, a bold statement, but true. All we need to do, is examine the threads on this board... Class assignment; find the threads where a Liberal has accepted some degree of compromise to their original stated position. After you realize the impossibility of this task, watch MSNBC or other liberal sources, and see if you ever notice any of them compromising or trying to meet in the middle, on anything. You'll notice, the only time they are willing to "meet in the middle" is when they are so bizarrely extreme, "the middle" becomes the best possible (and only realistic) liberal outcome. They'll back down on unconstitutionally taking our guns away, if we agree to let them ban ammo and clips... that sort of thing.

When we encounter a liberal in debate, regardless of the issue, they are simply not willing to budge one iota, in order to resolve the issue. In their minds, they are right and everyone else is wrong, end of discussion. Whenever a person from the right poses arguments for reforming Social Security, it's (in a liberal's mind) because the right wants old people to die in the streets. Whenever someone opposes gay marriage, it's because they are homophobes and hate gay people. If someone suggests we evaluate Affirmative Action, it's because they are racists who hate black people. If we oppose nationalized health care, we must not care about poor sick people. They have allowed their bigotry to cement these thoughts in their minds, and they can't see any other viewpoint as valid.

Until Liberals begin to recognize their adversaries as a noble opposition, they will forever be stuck in the wilderness of hate and rage. No one is right 100% o the time, except for Liberal BIGOTS!

Some conservative adversaries are noble, on this board Damocles is an example. In the news there are plenty of examples. You however are not an example, and that is likely why you dont get treated as such. The second you are confronted with an opposing view, you start name calling. When time proves you were wrong, you spin and ofucate instead of simply and nobly saying, "I was wrong."

I belive we can have a discussion on Affirmative Action, and have done so, without calling anyone names. I belive one can be against gay marriage without being a homophobe, and have discussed it, on this site, in depth, without calling anyone a homophobe.

You should look up the word Projection when you next attempt to start a thread such as this one!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top