Jim Carrey... jealous much?

Superfreak said:
If he was looking for civilized dialogue on the issue, perhaps he shouldn't have started out by mocking a persons position that is no longer alive to defend them? Perhaps he shouldn't have sung:

"Cold Dead Hand' is abt u heartless motherf -- kers unwilling 2 bend 4 the safety of our kids. Sorry if you're offended by the word safety"

Given the above is complete bullshit... no one is against trying to protect the kids. But he pretends that is the case simply because others don't agree with his methods.


​
Click to expand...

Is there some JPP rule that I don't know about stipulating Sf has to answer every post I make?
 
Superfreak said:
you post on a message board that something is worth reading... forgive me for actually reading it and commenting on it.
Click to expand...

Next time just read it. Then think about it for a while. Then keep your conclusions to yourself.

Just try that once, you never know, you might like it. I know I will.
 
Superfreak said:
sorry... shot was there... I took it. Two birds, one stone
Click to expand...

See look at this, you are constantly belittling Dixie, Bravo and other righties, and they either don't notice, don't think you're worth responding to, or are afraid of you.

Maybe they don't read your posts. Either way it would be better for you to stick with them, shooting fish in the barrel so to speak. Anytime you mess with myself, Rana, or Christie you just end up being humiliated, and frankly your reputation can't take much more of this.
 
Darla said:
Next time just read it. Then think about it for a while. Then keep your conclusions to yourself.

Just try that once, you never know, you might like it. I know I will.
Click to expand...

Or next time you could just leave and not return... it would have the same effect for you and would benefit the rest of us as well with a deserved break from your nonsense.
 
Darla said:
See look at this, you are constantly belittling Dixie, Bravo and other righties, and they either don't notice, don't think you're worth responding to, or are afraid of you.

Maybe they don't read your posts. Either way it would be better for you to stick with them, shooting fish in the barrel so to speak. Anytime you mess with myself, Rana, or Christie you just end up being humiliated, and frankly your reputation can't take much more of this.
Click to expand...

Yet more evidence of just how delusional you are. Keep talking and it will just be that much harder for Rana to defend it.
 
Superfreak said:
Yet more evidence of just how delusional you are. Keep talking and it will just be that much harder for Rana to defend it.
Click to expand...


Your replies don't make sense. See, the problem with you is you always have to have the last word. So the longer the back and forth goes on, the less sense you make. And you don't exactly start out as Confucius.

When you have nothing to say Superfreak; say nothing.
 
Darla said:
Your replies don't make sense. See, the problem with you is you always have to have the last word. So the longer the back and forth goes on, the less sense you make. And you don't exactly start out as Confucius.

When you have nothing to say Superfreak; say nothing.
Click to expand...

As I stated, you are delusional. You live in a fantasy world. Not shocking the real word doesn't make sense to you.
 
Superfreak said:
As I stated, you are delusional. You live in a fantasy world. Not shocking the real word doesn't make sense to you.
Click to expand...

You already stated that! But you have to come back and say "as I stated" because anytime someone says anything, you have to respond otherwise they might get the last word! This is a compulsion with you. It's like OCD. It's messed up.
 
Darla said:
You already stated that! But you have to come back and say "as I stated" because anytime someone says anything, you have to respond otherwise they might get the last word! This is a compulsion with you. It's like OCD. It's messed up.
Click to expand...

Yes, hence the words 'as I stated'. Given your state of delusion it is not surprising I have to say things over and over again.
 
petscan1.gif
 
Thing1 said:
How am I attacking you?
Click to expand...

By distorting what I said, by using words I did not use, by insinuating I have said things I did not say.

You flat out said that Laura is "more qualified" to render an opinion, because of the internships she had & the fact that she has a nationally syndicated show.
Click to expand...

I said she was more qualified to give a political opinion, not that her opinion was more valid. Jim Carrey is more qualified to act in comedy movies. Ted Nugent is more qualified to make rock music. Koby Bryant is more qualified to play basketball.

I disagree w/ that premise. To me, a world where we elevate people like her or any of the punditry as "more qualified" when it comes to opinions is a kind of scary place, and not what the founders envisioned when they spoke of the "marketplace of ideas."
Click to expand...

Well, I am sorry, but we've ALWAYS lived in a world where people with university degrees and experience are more qualified than others, and their opinions are valued. Laura Ingraham is paid to give her opinion by people who are paid by advertisers, because her opinion is valued. I did not say her opinions are more valid, or that other people's opinions are invalid.

What are you afraid of, anyway? Is it so difficult to hear opinions that you don't agree with?
Click to expand...

It has nothing to do with being afraid of anything. It has nothing to do with opinions I agree with or disagree with. I made a statement with regard to my respect for other people. Those who exploit their position in life to do something the rest of us can't do, because we lack their status, is offensive to me. No one is paying Jim Carrey to be a political speaker or for his political opinions, he is exploiting his fame and connection with the media, to pontificate his personal views. He has that right, I haven't said he shouldn't have that right, but I don't have to respect him for it. To me, it is much more respectable to deliver whatever political message you have through your art. Make a movie and tell me about your political view, I can appreciate that, but grabbing the mic because you happen to be famous, and lecturing me on your political views, is just not cool with me. I don't care if it's Ted Nugent, who I agree with, or Jim Carrey, who I don't. Laura Ingraham is okay because she is being paid by advertisers to do what she does, and that is her job. When advertisers pay Jim Carrey to do a nationally syndicated political talk show, I will feel differently, but that is not currently the case.
 
Darla said:
See look at this, you are constantly belittling Dixie, Bravo and other righties, and they either don't notice, don't think you're worth responding to, or are afraid of you.

Maybe they don't read your posts. Either way it would be better for you to stick with them, shooting fish in the barrel so to speak. Anytime you mess with myself, Rana, or Christie you just end up being humiliated, and frankly your reputation can't take much more of this.
Click to expand...

Reputation? Bwahahahahahahahaha! That' a good one! Reputation! The last time anyone saw SFs reputation, it was drunk and trying to buy a prostitute in Thailand.

It's impossible not to notice SF, it's like trying to not notice a spoiled 2-year-old, but very much like a 2-year-old, there is nothing to fear. I can't speak for the other righties you mentioned, but I personally don't respond to SF because he's not worth my time. I'll engage him sometimes out of sheer boredom, or in order that he might illustrate what an insufferable prick he is to the rest of the board.
 
Dixie said:
Reputation? Bwahahahahahahahaha! That' a good one! Reputation! The last time anyone saw SFs reputation, it was drunk and trying to buy a prostitute in Thailand.

It's impossible not to notice SF, it's like trying to not notice a spoiled 2-year-old, but very much like a 2-year-old, there is nothing to fear. I can't speak for the other righties you mentioned, but I personally don't respond to SF because he's not worth my time. I'll engage him sometimes out of sheer boredom, or in order that he might illustrate what an insufferable prick he is to the rest of the board.
Click to expand...

Dixie this is the one thing I full agree with you on.
 
Dixie said:
It has nothing to do with being afraid of anything. It has nothing to do with opinions I agree with or disagree with. I made a statement with regard to my respect for other people. Those who exploit their position in life to do something the rest of us can't do, because we lack their status, is offensive to me. No one is paying Jim Carrey to be a political speaker or for his political opinions, he is exploiting his fame and connection with the media, to pontificate his personal views. He has that right, I haven't said he shouldn't have that right, but I don't have to respect him for it. To me, it is much more respectable to deliver whatever political message you have through your art. Make a movie and tell me about your political view, I can appreciate that, but grabbing the mic because you happen to be famous, and lecturing me on your political views, is just not cool with me. I don't care if it's Ted Nugent, who I agree with, or Jim Carrey, who I don't. Laura Ingraham is okay because she is being paid by advertisers to do what she does, and that is her job. When advertisers pay Jim Carrey to do a nationally syndicated political talk show, I will feel differently, but that is not currently the case.
Click to expand...

The devil is breaking out his down filled parka... this one paragraph, written my my longtime nemesis, is something I actually kind of agree with.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top