Cold Dead Hand

I Love America said:
Jim Carreys little rant of a man whose career has died and is desperately trying to be relevant

Maybe he can do a rendition of Fireman Bob. That is when he was funny.

Gun controls ship like Jim Carreys career has passed
Click to expand...

Fire Marshall Bill, otherwise I agree completely, speaking of ships sailing I guess the tolerance ship has passed also since no liberal has ever been tolerant of others beliefs.
 
Superfreak said:
Them making profits doesn't change one thing about what I stated. If the liberals weren't dancing on the graves of the kids and screaming about banning certain types of guns and clips... do you think sales would have escalated? This is the same exact thing that happened the last time liberals jumped up and down screaming to ban certain guns.

Every time you do so, gun and ammo sales are going to go up. Stop dancing on the graves and the gun and ammo makers who you hate so much won't make as much money.
Click to expand...



Independent said:
The increased sales of weapons and ammo is NOT due to the deaths of the children. It is due to the fear of the overreaction that might occur due to the hyperbole of the radical left and the speculation of how that might affect future weapon and ammo sales.
Click to expand...

I'm talking about the gun and ammo manufacturers jacking up their prices to scam y'all. If this was after a hurricane and it was gas prices there'd be lawsuits flowing. Instead, you gun nuts just bend over and take it with a smile on your face.
 
Independent said:
What mass killers ALL have in common is the use of violent video games before they have gone on their murder spree. More people are killed by blunt objects every year than by the assault weapons that the radical left is trying to ban.

Thus, it seems that it would make more sense to ban video games and rocks than to ban assault weapons.

Just sayin'
Click to expand...


Really?

What particular video games was Charles Starkweather fond of?
 
Independent said:
So, there would be an uproar if violent video games were banned because there is not enough of a correlation between mass murders and people who play violent video games. interesting. Yet there is more of a correlation between violent video games and the so called assault weapons that the radical left wishes to ban...

What conclusions might we infer from these points?
Click to expand...

That there is no causation between either?
 
Howey said:
I'm talking about the gun and ammo manufacturers jacking up their prices to scam y'all. If this was after a hurricane and it was gas prices there'd be lawsuits flowing. Instead, you gun nuts just bend over and take it with a smile on your face.
Click to expand...

Supply/demand is a fundamental aspect of business. When the government also buys up ammo in insane quantities, that too drives up prices. Again, that has nothing to do with my earlier comments and it most certainly doesn't change what I stated as you suggested it did.
 
Independent said:
The increased sales of weapons and ammo is NOT due to the deaths of the children. It is due to the fear of the overreaction that might occur due to the hyperbole of the radical left and the speculation of how that might affect future weapon and ammo sales.
Click to expand...


Well, it is at least refreshing to see a pro-gun advocate admit that fear is what drives gun sales...
 
Lucius Cornelius Sulla said:
That'd be like saying a ban on Islam and Christianity wasn't a ban on religion because there would still be plenty to choose from.
Click to expand...

No, it wouldn't.

It can't be spelled out any plainer than that...since the Newtown massacre, no one has EVER said they wanted to "ban ALL guns".

The word "ALL" was used...as in "ban ALL guns".

You do know the definition of "all" right?

If it was an imprecise choice, then take it up with whoever made the claim.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
No, it wouldn't.

It can't be spelled out any plainer than that...since the Newtown massacre, no one has EVER said they wanted to "ban ALL guns".

The word "ALL" was used...as in "ban ALL guns".

You do know the definition of "all" right?

If it was an imprecise choice, then take it up with whoever made the claim.
Click to expand...

I've heard it from PLENTY of people. To pretend that there wasn't a group of people who do want to ban all guns is either being deliberately ignorant or lying. But even if the goal at time was not, all guns, it was still an assault on all gun rights, and subsequently ALL rights in general.
 
Superfreak said:
Lol... her post was thoroughly debunked, she then resorted to the 'u so angry' default when she realized just how stupid her post was. Maybe you will take a shot at answering since she would not?
Click to expand...

LMAO I didn't even read the post you "debunked" me in. I saw the last sentence where you called me dumb, again, and I just laughed.

I think if you were like 10, it would be awfully cute how you stomp your feet and then claim you "debunked" everyone here on a daily basis. But...you're not 10
 
Darla said:
LMAO I didn't even read the post you "debunked" me in. I saw the last sentence where you called me dumb, again, and I just laughed.

I think if you were like 10, it would be awfully cute how you stomp your feet and then claim you "debunked" everyone here on a daily basis. But...you're not 10
Click to expand...

Can't help but notice you still didn't address the points that trashed your argument. Why is that? Instead (as I mentioned already) we get the above type of sad response.
 
Superfreak said:
No... it is not a political act. It is the act of a lunatic. A lunatic who meticulously detailed previous mass murders and charted them. A lunatic who played a lot of video games and wanted to get the high score.

The AR15 was the tool this lunatic chose. The lunatic at UCF chose to make a bunch of bombs, but not a peep from the left about that. Was it because he at least had the decency to kill himself before unleashing those bombs? Or was it because you know how stupid it would make you look to go after the chemicals he used to make the bombs?

It is not the weapon chosen... it is the person that is the problem. But you cannot grasp that fact because the music you play while dancing on those kids graves is just too loud for you to hear rational thought.



The 'dummies' are people like you Darla. Do you honestly think this kid would have said 'damn, AR15's are illegal, I guess I can't go psycho'? No, he would simply have chosen another type of weapon. But you fear mongers don't care about that. You have graves to dance upon.

It is truly comical when you try to pretend that you are the one who gets to decide if something is political/discrimantory/racists/sexist etc... bottom line Darla is that you don't know what the fuck you are talking about... but you THINK you do... big problem
Click to expand...

There you go Darla... care to take a crack at responding? Or will we just get more nonsense from you?
 
Superfreak said:
There you go Darla... care to take a crack at responding? Or will we just get more nonsense from you?
Click to expand...

Superfreak I don't have a penis. Your pissing matches just make me laugh. There is nothing to respond to, your post is an opinion. I believe it's a stupid opinion. I already posted mine. You really need to keep this penis stuff to the guys where it matters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top