Registration WILL lead to CONFISCATION. Don't trust the takers.

Threedee said:
They probably should have, though, seeing as how you are probably a danger to society on the road.
Click to expand...


Jarod is no danger, he still unlocks his trunk to this day, climbs in and continues looking for the start button. If he ever figures out how the car works, then Florida has yet another problem on the road.
 
Superfreak said:
It is not shifting the goal posts you moron. It is a question designed to get you to comprehend the path that is being laid out before us by the fear mongers.

You continually dodging the question is a good sign that you know we are right.

Registration is simply going to lead to the eventual confiscation of weapons... one type of gun/mag at at time.

So you can scream 'The End' all you like as we all know what you are really saying is 'I am an idiot in way over my head'
Click to expand...

Hmmmm....I thought constantly proclaiming that you're "right" and that you won & calling names and all that meant that you really lost?

Guess that's another double-standard; just depends what side you're on.

Here is what you think you are right on: in SF-world, it is "acceptable" to say something WILL happen, when it can, even though it might not.

Whip-smart.
 
Thing1 said:
Hmmmm....I thought constantly proclaiming that you're "right" and that you won & calling names and all that meant that you really lost?

Guess that's another double-standard; just depends what side you're on.

Here is what you think you are right on: in SF-world, it is "acceptable" to say something WILL happen, when it can, even though it might not.

Whip-smart.
Click to expand...

I am sorry, but you already declared 'the End'... so why are you back? Shouldn't you be off proclaiming faux victories elsewhere now?
 
Thing1 said:
I ended the argument ages ago; when I first posted on the thread, actually.

I'm hanging around a little because this is just fun now.
Click to expand...

yes, you did indeed do that when you first spewed your stupidity on it, proving beyond a doubt that you were wrong and that Grind was correct.

It is a bit odd that you take such pleasure in your own foolishness. But if you want to stick around and be mocked some more, by all means... continue.

Does this mean you are going to actually answer some questions now? Or are you just going to continually proclaim victory over and over again?
 
Superfreak said:
yes, you did indeed do that when you first spewed your stupidity on it, proving beyond a doubt that you were wrong and that Grind was correct.

It is a bit odd that you take such pleasure in your own foolishness. But if you want to stick around and be mocked some more, by all means... continue.

Does this mean you are going to actually answer some questions now? Or are you just going to continually proclaim victory over and over again?
Click to expand...

I didn't really proclaim victory. I just said I was having fun.

But if it's "victory" to present an easy fact - that registration CAN lead to confiscation, but doesn't always - then I guess I did win.
 
Lorax...

1) Show us an example of how gun registry of all gun owners helps reduce/solve crime

2) Do you support bans on so called 'assault' rifles?

3) Do you support bans on magazine capacity?
 
Superfreak said:
Lorax...

1) Show us an example of how gun registry of all gun owners helps reduce/solve crime

2) Do you support bans on so called 'assault' rifles?

3) Do you support bans on magazine capacity?
Click to expand...

Why would I waste my time on that stuff?

My contention was the Grind's thread title was wrong. It is.

Sorry 'bout that. You can start another thread about the above, separate issues if you'd like. You can even call it something like "See my new goalpost."
 
Thing1 said:
Why would I waste my time on that stuff?

My contention was the Grind's thread title was wrong. It is.

Sorry 'bout that. You can start another thread about the above, separate issues if you'd like. You can even call it something like "See my new goalpost."
Click to expand...

Once again you prove that you don't wish to actually discuss the issue. Answer the above and you will see that I am not moving the goal posts. I am showing you where a gun registry leads. If a gun registry does not help prevent/solve crimes then what other purpose does it have?

You know the answers will make you look stupid. That is why you refuse to answer them.
 
Superfreak said:
Once again you prove that you don't wish to actually discuss the issue. Answer the above and you will see that I am not moving the goal posts. I am showing you where a gun registry leads. If a gun registry does not help prevent/solve crimes then what other purpose does it have?

You know the answers will make you look stupid. That is why you refuse to answer them.
Click to expand...

I fail to see how my personal feelings on weapons & gun control change the immutable fact that gun registration does not ALWAYS lead to confiscation.

Just to indulge you - since I can see you are becoming emotionally unhinged on this - STY posted a thread just a few days ago about how someone who had been admitted to a mental hospital was tracked using their gun registration, and their guns were confiscated. STY thought this was a bad thing, but to me, this is how registration should work - help us find out who might be mentally ill, or prone to violence, etc, and not allow gun ownership for those individuals.

I support bans on assault weapons and bans on magazine capacity.
 
Thing1 said:
Just as aside on the thread in general, I find it consistently amazing that those on the NRA side of things accuse the left of "fearmongering" on the issue, but when it comes to their own hysterical claims of "theys comin' to take all of y'all's guns, America!", it's just a "statement of fact."
Click to expand...
how is the situation any different than when further restrictions are placed on abortions and the left goes all bat shit crazy that it will lead to a total ban on abortions?????
 
Thing1 said:
I fail to see how my personal feelings on weapons & gun control change the immutable fact that gun registration does not ALWAYS lead to confiscation.

Just to indulge you - since I can see you are becoming emotionally unhinged on this - STY posted a thread just a few days ago about how someone who had been admitted to a mental hospital was tracked using their gun registration, and their guns were confiscated. STY thought this was a bad thing, but to me, this is how registration should work - help us find out who might be mentally ill, or prone to violence, etc, and not allow gun ownership for those individuals.
Click to expand...
and what you didn't bother to learn from the story is that the HUSBANDS guns were confiscated after the WIFE voluntarily admitted herself. THIS is a BAD thing and now how registration is supposed to work, but the government didn't let the intent of the law stop them from confiscating weapons, did it?

Thing1 said:
I support bans on assault weapons and bans on magazine capacity.
Click to expand...
do you support the exemptions for police and military then?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
explain why cars are registered and why they aren't being confiscated by government, then explain why you think guns should be registered.
Click to expand...

Cars are registered because they are an inherantly dangerous machine and ownership requires certian responsabilities. They are not generally confiscated by the government unless they were used to commit a crime.

Guns should be registered because they are an inherantly dangerous machine and ownership should require certian responsabilities.
 
Jarod said:
Cars are registered because they are an inherantly dangerous machine and ownership requires certian responsabilities. They are not generally confiscated by the government unless they were used to commit a crime.

Guns should be registered because they are an inherantly dangerous machine and ownership should require certian responsabilities.
Click to expand...

wow, you totally made up that bullshit to legitimize your position. how lawyerly of you ROFL. it's also bullshit.
 
Thing1 said:
I fail to see how my personal feelings on weapons & gun control change the immutable fact that gun registration does not ALWAYS lead to confiscation.

Just to indulge you - since I can see you are becoming emotionally unhinged on this - STY posted a thread just a few days ago about how someone who had been admitted to a mental hospital was tracked using their gun registration, and their guns were confiscated. STY thought this was a bad thing, but to me, this is how registration should work - help us find out who might be mentally ill, or prone to violence, etc, and not allow gun ownership for those individuals.

I support bans on assault weapons and bans on magazine capacity.
Click to expand...


Lmao... and there we have yet another of the cop outs from the left. Declaration that the other person is 'becoming unhinged'. Made popular by the ever lovable losers Darla and Dung, it seems Lorax is now a part of their merry little band of lovable losers.
 
Thing1 said:
I fail to see how my personal feelings on weapons & gun control change the immutable fact that gun registration does not ALWAYS lead to confiscation.

Just to indulge you - since I can see you are becoming emotionally unhinged on this - STY posted a thread just a few days ago about how someone who had been admitted to a mental hospital was tracked using their gun registration, and their guns were confiscated. STY thought this was a bad thing, but to me, this is how registration should work - help us find out who might be mentally ill, or prone to violence, etc, and not allow gun ownership for those individuals.

I support bans on assault weapons and bans on magazine capacity.
Click to expand...

That said, since you answered... why do you support magazine capacity bans when a person can simply carry multiple clips? It is the same as the NY city attempt to ban large sodas. It doesn't limit ammo available to a user, it simply changes the format of how they carry it. If a person can change clips in a couple of seconds (max) or carry multiple weapons with fewer rounds, then how does the ban help anything?

Say the bans you want took place and a person walked in with two 45's and multiple clips and another Sandy Hook type massacre occurred. What would be your response with regards to those guns?

As far as registration goes, the registration simply would allow the government to force citizens to give up guns in the case of arbitrary bans... as we saw in the case in Canada.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top