Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
We have a lot of agreement on what you've said here good brother.
I hope you got a good grade for your assignment. :0)
lol thanks...i honestly don't remember
We have a lot of agreement on what you've said here good brother.
I hope you got a good grade for your assignment. :0)
lol thanks...i honestly don't remember
Good Brother, you just now figured that shit out?
![]()
It is "society" which provides man with food, clothing, a home, the tools of work, language, the forms of thought, and most of the content of thought; his life is made possible through the labor and the accomplishments of the many millions past and present who are all hidden behind the small word "society."
-- Albert Einstein: Why Socialism
Catchy quote BAC, until you actually THINK about what it says.....then its mostly bullshit, though man has probably lived in tribal groups for protection
since they walked upright....
The groups certainly weren't created for the reasons of food, clothing, tools, or a home....communication to some degree is a luxury, not necessary to survival,
Man is a social animal to the degree that most animals are that live in groups, nature....mostly for protection and certainly for procreation.....survival of the species being a creation of nature, so as far as 'a society' goes, its a product of nature and instinct.....we are no different than a school of fish ....
Quite a stretch piece of crap to equate these things with socialism as we view that today......it is a common enough trait of man to latch onto an idea or conclusion and then hunt
high and low for evidence to prove their conclusion......as easy for an isolatinist as it is for socialist......with niether one ever being totally right.
Its an ever changing mind set....not math set in stone.
Yeah shithead, you are the first person he ever was compelled to ignore. Another of BAC's sterling qualities.
I am honored. You think I give two shits about that POS? But I totally get that BAC is the JPP token black so we have to treat him with kid gloves
I think you missed my point. Which ever politician Dr. King supported in his life time I doubt that he supported any of them without reservation, suspicion or complete trust because of the simple fact that none we're ever truly on his side or trust worthy. Dr. King did maintain a working dialogue with them because regardless of what he thought or felt about these people, they were the people he had to work with and to a point he worked with them indeed.Far be it from me to interrupt two white dudes shooting the shit and telling it like it is. You guys always do know, and after all I'm just a girl, but, I read...opps! I mean a boyfriend of mine once read to me, a book called "Judgement Days; LBJ, MLK Jr., and the laws that changed America". Now from the parts I understood, it seems that actually King and Johnson had a very bad falling out over King's decision to speak out against the war. Further, MLK was assassinated in early 1968...two months before the Summer of Love would even begin.
In other words; he would have been speaking out a whole lot more. Had he lived.
Why do I sound so facetious in this post? Because it literaly makes me sick that the blowhard Tom, comes on here and presents himself as a fucking expert on everything under the sun. He knows shit from shinola about most things, but can always come up with a link. He's a google expert.
Try reading a fucking book! I don't think you know as much about LBJ as you act like you do here either Mott. I really don't.
Sorry, but neither of you have disproved the OP.
I am not sure I agree with the OP, completely. I think it's difficult to say (though King would NOT have supported drones and these continued bombings, period).
But neither you or Tom have proved or disproved anything.
Correct me if I'm wrong but as student of Ghandi, Dr. King was opposed to violence, period.Exactly.
King wouldn't have been VEHEMENTLY opposed to murdering CHILDREN????
Hell it would be even easier for her to find a man if their wasn't so many knuckle dragging antideluvians like you polluting the gene pool. Darla may be many things but she is responsible and does have a social conscience!You might find an easier time finding a man if you didn't have such a big chip on your shoulder. You are sooooo insecure
I'm sure he would have been as am I. Conversely I believe their is much he would have supported. Which is essentially the point I keep trying to make.They think that because Obama is black that King would not have been critical of his policies .. which is a complete misreading of Dr. King.
King would have been critical of far more than just Obama's love of war.
Not with certainty. True dat.i appreciate BAC's comments and some other posters comments, however, i don't believe any of us can truly say what dr. king would say or do today regarding obama or the dem party.
I remember being called "Niger Lover" by several of my classmates in the 6th grade for reading Richard Wrights "Black Boy". Not too surprizing considering I went to school in the midwest that was rural and all white. I said nothing to them but discussed it with my father as I was to confused as how to respond to their comments. I asked my father why they called me that and he gave what I thought was a good answer. He said they called you that because they're afraid of these people and it's easer to hate a "thing" than a person.i agree about MLK. i think the dems, by and large are still against poverty. war, not so much. then again, dems back then were not against war so much either...vietnam was started by a dem. while i believe we can speculate, based on MLK finally coming out against vietnam, that he would be opposed to today's wars and military action, i can't say for sure. you know more about him than i, however, 9/11 changed a lot of people.
i also believe MLK would not have hesitated to criticize obama, he firmly believed in not judging people by the color of their skin. this is something i also share. a cute story aside...i actually wrote about his i have a dream speech for my second grade writing assignment and his speech has resonated with me to this very day.
I wouldn't say that. Obama has to represent a much larger constituency than either Dr. King or Malcom X did.:0)
I certainly don't suggest that everyone's perspective of King or Obama should be my perspective. But I'm sharing the perspective of a lot of people who lived the era of King as I did, and many others who have studied him.
Obama is symbolism, King, like Malcom, were the real deal.
I remember being called "Niger Lover" by several of my classmates in the 6th grade for reading Richard Wrights "Black Boy". Not too surprizing considering I went to school in the midwest that was rural and all white. I said nothing to them but discussed it with my father as I was to confused as how to respond to their comments. I asked my father why they called me that and he gave what I thought was a good answer. He said they called you that because they're afraid of these people and it's easer to hate a "thing" than a person.
I remember being called "Niger Lover" by several of my classmates in the 6th grade for reading Richard Wrights "Black Boy". Not too surprizing considering I went to school in the midwest that was rural and all white. I said nothing to them but discussed it with my father as I was to confused as how to respond to their comments. I asked my father why they called me that and he gave what I thought was a good answer. He said they called you that because they're afraid of these people and it's easer to hate a "thing" than a person.
King worked well with republicans as well. In fact, he was a republican.
I don't believe that
The suggestion that King supported LBJ because he worked well with him is no suggestion that he supported his war. Have you read his Vietnam speech?
Perhaps you weren't here at the time, but King was quite apolitical. He didn't sing the praises of either party, not did he tell his followers to go vote for either of them. He most certainly had a political ministry .. but he didn't give a damn about the two party system.
Far be it from me to interrupt two white dudes shooting the shit and telling it like it is. You guys always do know, and after all I'm just a girl, but, I read...opps! I mean a boyfriend of mine once read to me, a book called "Judgement Days; LBJ, MLK Jr., and the laws that changed America". Now from the parts I understood, it seems that actually King and Johnson had a very bad falling out over King's decision to speak out against the war. Further, MLK was assassinated in early 1968...two months before the Summer of Love would even begin.
In other words; he would have been speaking out a whole lot more. Had he lived.
Why do I sound so facetious in this post? Because it literaly makes me sick that the blowhard Tom, comes on here and presents himself as a fucking expert on everything under the sun. He knows shit from shinola about most things, but can always come up with a link. He's a google expert.
Try reading a fucking book! I don't think you know as much about LBJ as you act like you do here either Mott. I really don't.
Sorry, but neither of you have disproved the OP.
I am not sure I agree with the OP, completely. I think it's difficult to say (though King would NOT have supported drones and these continued bombings, period).
But neither you or Tom have proved or disproved anything.
Hell it would be even easier for her to find a man if their wasn't so many knuckle dragging antideluvians like you polluting the gene pool. Darla may be many things but she is responsible and does have a social conscience!
Hell it would be even easier for her to find a man if their wasn't so many knuckle dragging antideluvians like you polluting the gene pool. Darla may be many things but she is responsible and does have a social conscience!
I think you missed my point. Which ever politician Dr. King supported in his life time I doubt that he supported any of them without reservation, suspicion or complete trust because of the simple fact that none we're ever truly on his side or trust worthy. Dr. King did maintain a working dialogue with them because regardless of what he thought or felt about these people, they were the people he had to work with and to a point he worked with them indeed.