looking forward to obamacare?????

Go ahead and link some cases. We can discuss them one by one. Guess how many will come from states with republican governors/legislatures?
who turned this in to a left/right debate????? are you telling me that NO states with democrat majority govs have taken kids?
 
who turned this in to a left/right debate????? are you telling me that NO states with democrat majority govs have taken kids?
The issue isn't the 'taking'. It's the murdering of the child in question. Red states brag about cuts to public programs.


Fla especially.



TALLAHASSEE — Gov. Rick Scott's plan to cut about $2 billion in public funding to hospitals that care for the poor is devastating and even ridiculous, say hospital leaders who predict patient care will suffer if it is enacted.
Scott's fellow Republicans in the Legislature say they don't like his plan, either. But they admit that the hospitals — which took a considerable hit last year — will face another swipe of the ax.

Tampa General Hospital and All Children's Hospital in St. Petersburg would each face estimated cuts of more than $70 million, according to the Florida Hospital Association. But three Pinellas HCA hospitals — Largo Medical Center, St. Petersburg General and Northside — would each get a few million more.
http://www.tampabay.com/news/health/article1212127.ece



From your article:

But they were under significant pressure to get Marie out of Tampa General Hospital, where she was placed after child protection workers took her into state care. Records show the hospital complained bitterly that it was losing money on her care. A hospital social worker, records say, "was adamant about the child leaving the hospital today
."


Rick Scott has blood on his hands.
 
Open each case, and we can discuss them. In the first, you haven't even read the article.

If you had, you'd see that Phil. was paying a PRIVATE company to tend to the patient. I haven't the time to go through them now.

If you want to present them, instead of being lazy, we can discuss
 
Open each case, and we can discuss them. In the first, you haven't even read the article.

If you had, you'd see that Phil. was paying a PRIVATE company to tend to the patient. I haven't the time to go through them now.

If you want to present them, instead of being lazy, we can discuss
what you want to do is nitpick each case to hopefully prove the left/right issue for your own political desires instead of the real issue, which is making the government more responsible for the health and well being of kids and people. I'm not turning this in to a left right issue, i'm criticizing the bigger government role. THAT is how obamacare will end up.
 
No, that isn't my claim. The claim on the table is that this will happen due to Obamacare.

yes, it will. it's inevitable. the more power you give government, the greater the bureaucracy and red tape, the more tragedies like the OP will happen. it won't matter whether it's dems or repubs running the nation at the time.
 
yes, it will. it's inevitable. the more power you give government, the greater the bureaucracy and red tape, the more tragedies like the OP will happen. it won't matter whether it's dems or repubs running the nation at the time.

There a lot of huge leaps of logic you take there. People generally say they don't need the government, until they actually do.

You realize that private insurance carriers routinely deny critical coverage & care to those who need it?
 
There a lot of huge leaps of logic you take there. People generally say they don't need the government, until they actually do.
this is relevant how?

You realize that private insurance carriers routinely deny critical coverage & care to those who need it?
i'm not denying that. what I'm doing is showing y'all the fundamental failure of government run ANYTHING, but this area specifically, and there will be ZERO accountability for it's failures. why is that difficult for you to understand?
 
this is relevant how?

i'm not denying that. what I'm doing is showing y'all the fundamental failure of government run ANYTHING, but this area specifically, and there will be ZERO accountability for it's failures. why is that difficult for you to understand?

So you're not really arguing about Obamacare. You're making an argument that government simply fails, at every level, regardless. You're making an argument that government shouldn't be involved in any aspect of our lives - security, defense, transportation, energy, foreign affairs.

You're arguing that there should be no government; not just that there shouldn't be Obamacare.
 
So you're not really arguing about Obamacare. You're making an argument that government simply fails, at every level, regardless. You're making an argument that government shouldn't be involved in any aspect of our lives - security, defense, transportation, energy, foreign affairs.

You're arguing that there should be no government; not just that there shouldn't be Obamacare.

CLAIM 1-------- making an argument that government simply fails, at every level, regardless.

CLAIM 2........... is making an argument that government shouldn't be involved in any aspect of our lives - security, defense, transportation, energy, foreign affairs.

Is your reading comprehension that deficient that you say claim 1 is equal to claim 2......?

If so....have a 5th grader explain the difference to you.
 
CLAIM 1-------- making an argument that government simply fails, at every level, regardless.

CLAIM 2........... is making an argument that government shouldn't be involved in any aspect of our lives - security, defense, transportation, energy, foreign affairs.

Is your reading comprehension that deficient that you say claim 1 is equal to claim 2......?

If so....have a 5th grader explain the difference to you.

You always seem so angry.
 
So you're not really arguing about Obamacare. You're making an argument that government simply fails, at every level, regardless. You're making an argument that government shouldn't be involved in any aspect of our lives - security, defense, transportation, energy, foreign affairs.

You're arguing that there should be no government; not just that there shouldn't be Obamacare.
so you're really going to use liberal talking points about Libertarianism wanting to make the US in to Somalia.

it's an incredible leap of logic to claim that restricting government involvement to the bare minimum required is advocating that there should be no government.
 
so you're really going to use liberal talking points about Libertarianism wanting to make the US in to Somalia.

it's an incredible leap of logic to claim that restricting government involvement to the bare minimum required is advocating that there should be no government.

It's not that big of a leap when you say the gov't fails when they try to run anything - anything at all.

Why would we want gov't running anything if they fail at running anything?
 
what you want to do is nitpick each case to hopefully prove the left/right issue for your own political desires instead of the real issue, which is making the government more responsible for the health and well being of kids and people. I'm not turning this in to a left right issue, i'm criticizing the bigger government role. THAT is how obamacare will end up.
You don't even know anything about Obamacare. A big part of the savings will be realized by improving services. It will happen by force. Medicare cuts will be made to hospitals that readmit patients for the same problem, if it wasn't treated properly the first time.

Obamacare focuses on improved care, preventive care, and reductions in profit taking.

The care is still delivered by the private sector. The case on the table has been directly tied to a teabag governor who made cuts to Medicaid, while giving money to hospitals that don't service the low income patients.

This, instead of raising taxes to pay for education.

That's a far cry from your claims about Obamacare.
 
Blame it on the election. Like Rmoney and Ryan, he was 100% certain Obama would lose. This is the stressor that plunged so many righties into deep depression.

The strange thing is there are dozens of countries with government medical and the citizens all insist on keeping their respective plans. There's no evidence any of those countries or any politician in those countries are running to have the plan overturned. I don't know where the Right get their impression of ObamaCare.

Well, I shouldn't say that. They get their impression by listening to the liars and vultures who would take a person's last cent before putting them into the ground. It's disgusting and vile.
 
The strange thing is there are dozens of countries with government medical and the citizens all insist on keeping their respective plans. There's no evidence any of those countries or any politician in those countries are running to have the plan overturned. I don't know where the Right get their impression of ObamaCare.

Well, I shouldn't say that. They get their impression by listening to the liars and vultures who would take a person's last cent before putting them into the ground. It's disgusting and vile.

They get their impressions and all information from the think tanks and ALEC a Koch Bros organization run on John Birch principles sold with Ayn Rand books and nonsense. There is no real fact just fictions and fear, that's all it takes to program those who are lazy and willfully ignorant. You'll notice they don't have facts or information to discuss these issues just talking points that they repeat endlessly. Which is why they're called bots. Garbage in, garbage out.
 
It's not that big of a leap when you say the gov't fails when they try to run anything - anything at all.

Why would we want gov't running anything if they fail at running anything?
why? because alot of you dolts trust government more than you do anything else, that's why.
 
Back
Top