GOP's Benghazi Smoking Gun Goes Up in Smoke

Superfreak said:
Poor little String... I do not hate Obama, that is simply nonsense you lemmings continue to parrot, right along with your chirping 'u racist'. I don't like Obama's policies, that is for certain. But you morons continually try to pretend that policy disagreements = racism/hate. It is beyond pathetic.
Click to expand...

You have no idea what you are talking about. I do not believe I called you a racist. But, I am not going to pull every punch on the racists. If you are not one then there is no reason for you to take that personally. I would suggest you distance yourself from their ignorant hate.
 
evince said:
I love you BAC but your info is just tainted.
Click to expand...

I love you as well good sister .. but all you can do is run from the information I post. Noy you or that moron 'surgeon' even attempt to address a truth that is right in front of you face.

Did a website make up the truth that millions of Libyans, a third of the entire country stood in massive protest against NATO bombing their country and iun support of Gaddafi?

Is that made up?

Why didn't YOUR news sources tell you that?

Did a website make up all the benefits that Gaddafi ensured that Libyans had as demonstrated in the video? Point out what is not true in the video. YOU CAN'T BECAUSE IT'S TRUE. All you and that fakeass 'surgeon' can do is RUN from the truth.

Your opposition to truth is based on the D behind the name of the person responsible.

You demonstrated no such blindness when it was an R behinbd the name .. AND, a great deal of the information that spoke to the truth about the invasion of Iraq came from alternative news .. which led to the demise of failth in MSM.

Your position is totally and completely dependent on the D.
 
TheRocketSurgeon said:
Dude, I do not have the patience to go over your overparsing bs, when you are not even offering anything new. Buzz off you stupid gnat. Go find your meal on bac's pile of .... or offer something new. You don't even know what you are getting into.
Click to expand...

Awww... is poor little String getting upset at being made a fool of?

I am not over parsing anything you moron. You are simply ignoring what was actually said and replacing it with your version where Obama's admin looks good.

There are a few flag wavers (wrong one) on this board who are obviously motivated by racism. They have been the major drivers of this attempt smear Obama here. I am going to call them what they are. If you feel bothered that some of that gets on you, then don't stand so close to them.
Click to expand...

Yes, there are racists out there String. You calling everyone who disagrees with the way Obama's admin handled this as racists is the problem. You are a pathetic little twit who wants to shout 'u racist' if someone disagrees.

Not voting for Obama or supporting any Democrats. For the record, I donated to a couple Republicans this year. WHat is my partisan angle? Since there are so many good little stalkers on this board I am sure you can verify.

I don't care if Obama wins or loses. I would rather they were actually talking about some real issues. This is just a blatant witch hunt.
Click to expand...

LMAO... this is not a witch hunt... this is a cover up again... just like F&F. The Obama admin fucks up and you twits come out ala Kevin Bacon shouting 'All is well'.
 
The Neo cons will control foriegn polkicy once again if robmoney wins.

Robmoney doesnt understand the world and is already set up to outsource this one to the neo con cabal.


If you want more Bush foreign policy vote for robmoney
 
TheRocketSurgeon said:
You have no idea what you are talking about. I do not believe I called you a racist. But, I am not going to pull every punch on the racists. If you are not one then there is no reason for you to take that personally. I would suggest you distance yourself from their ignorant hate.
Click to expand...

the point is that you are calling people who are questioning Benghazi racists for doing so. THAT is ignorant hate. YOU are the one projecting onto them that which is not there.
 
TheRocketSurgeon said:
I am working off the facts as we know them and that have been presented.

bac is claiming some sort of special knowledge that makes him better than "stupid Americans" which he is somehow not a part of. He is a clown. His information comes form some whacked out left wing conspiracy site full of unsourced material supplied by crazies. This is why he rarely shares a source and finds the need to distort the ones he does use.

You do realize that his position is that everybody in Libya loved Quadaffi and that all the opposition came from the CIA. According to clowns like him, Saddam Hussein got +90% of the vote and the leaders of North Korea are loved by their people. Don't you remember Michael Moore's presentation of how great life was in Iraq before we invaded? That's who bac is. You want to agree with that kind of lunacy do so honestly.

You and the racist chicken shits are just taking what ever little piece of information you can get to blast Obama. You don't actually agree with bac. Your just partisan hacks.

I don't actually agree with Obama, but I would rather see him challenged and debated on honest topics. These weak appeals to emotion from little racist twits don't do anything but distract us from the real issues.
Click to expand...

That from a dumb motherfucker like you who won't even attempt to challenge what I post.

You're nothing more than a partisan whore who isn't the least bit interested in critical debate.

You seriously don't want to debate me because you are the epitome of the dumb ass American I speak of.

Don't believe that you are .. I can prove it to you.
 
Superfreak said:
Yes moron... number one refers to the comment after the number one in the post you had previously quoted. Do you need me to draw you a map so you can figure that out???

I have read the transcripts, I have posted the transcripts, they say exactly what I stated they said. They continually proclaim it was the video while at the same time saying they are investigating to find out what happened. Do I need to repost this 1000 more times before you comprehend it?

you do realize that in the questions the reporters are trying to get them to clarify their position? That Carney kept coming back to the video so many times that they had to ask him over and over again if that is what he thought caused it?

Had he said 'we are not certain of the cause of the attack and will let you know when we have more details' and left it at that, there would not have been the confusion. Instead he and others in the Admin continued claiming that the video/spontaneous protests were the reason, while AT THE SAME TIME proclaiming that the investigation was ongoing into the cause.

What part of that are you too ignorant to comprehend string?
Click to expand...

Lol, no that would be post #2. Another weak attempt by you to save face. I already addressed brava's weak post pointing out that it was off topic and then in detail.

The transcripts do not support you. We went over it in other threads and you were clearly conflating comments on issues in Cairo and through out the middle east with Benghazi. You have nothing.
 
evince said:
Bush went into Iraq with shock and awe becuase the Iraqi people were trying to revolt against a dictator?


REALLY?

I dont think even Bush tried to use that reason even though he used many excuses.... um I mean reasons
Click to expand...


left unanswered
 
Superfreak said:
the point is that you are calling people who are questioning Benghazi racists for doing so. THAT is ignorant hate. YOU are the one projecting onto them that which is not there.
Click to expand...

No, I am not. I am suggesting the primary motivation of racists who question Benghazi is their racism. It becomes clear as they shift positions and grasp for one straw after the next that their motives are not genuine and the facts do not matter.

Again, I don't believe I called you a racist. I don't honestly think of you as one. IMO, you ignore the facts because you are a partisan hack.
 
Be it so declared, anybody who opposes Obama's actions will be hereby declared racist.

That includes black people who oppose him.

Stupid.
 
Superfreak said:
1) The Obama admin continued pretending it was the 'video' despite claiming they were 'waiting for the investigation to determine what provoked it'
2) The Obama admin failed to aide the embassy staff... again... the military in Sicily could have had fighters within the hour and spec ops within 3 on site. But no... nothing.

3) Now we hear that the CIA requested to go help and were denied.

Yet you pretend there isn't a cover up. It is you that mocks the deaths of the four by pretending the Obama admin is being above board with what happened.
Click to expand...

TheRocketSurgeon said:
You are lying. The administration kept saying that it was unclear. Stevens and Smith were dead in the first hour and short of them not being there to begin with, nothing could have changed that. Doherty and Woods died many hours later after it had appeard the situation was under control. There were forces moving in at that point but Libya is a mess. Still, if they had arrived our casualties might have increased.
Click to expand...

Superfreak said:
You are a fucking retard. Read number one again moron. The admin continually kept putting forth the 'video did it' while at the same time saying 'we are investigating to find out what happened'....

If they were 'investigating because it was unclear'... why the fuck did they keep pushing the video angle for almost two weeks?
Click to expand...

TheRocketSurgeon said:
Number one? Do you even know what thread you are in? They did not push anything. Read the trasncripts. They were asked about the video and they basically said, it may have played a role but whether it was the only issue was unclear. You do realize that they are being lead by questions, right? Or are you as stupid as the rest and think they just come out to the podium and start saying things?
Click to expand...

Superfreak said:
Yes moron... number one refers to the comment after the number one in the post you had previously quoted. Do you need me to draw you a map so you can figure that out???

I have read the transcripts, I have posted the transcripts, they say exactly what I stated they said. They continually proclaim it was the video while at the same time saying they are investigating to find out what happened. Do I need to repost this 1000 more times before you comprehend it?

you do realize that in the questions the reporters are trying to get them to clarify their position? That Carney kept coming back to the video so many times that they had to ask him over and over again if that is what he thought caused it?

Had he said 'we are not certain of the cause of the attack and will let you know when we have more details' and left it at that, there would not have been the confusion. Instead he and others in the Admin continued claiming that the video/spontaneous protests were the reason, while AT THE SAME TIME proclaiming that the investigation was ongoing into the cause.

What part of that are you too ignorant to comprehend string?
Click to expand...

TheRocketSurgeon said:
Lol, no that would be post #2. Another weak attempt by you to save face. I already addressed brava's weak post pointing out that it was off topic and then in detail.

The transcripts do not support you. We went over it in other threads and you were clearly conflating comments on issues in Cairo and through out the middle east with Benghazi. You have nothing.
Click to expand...

The above might help you from getting confused further. Let me know if you still can't figure out what number one is. Next time I ask you if you need a map... just say yes.
 
TheRocketSurgeon said:
The transcripts do not support you. We went over it in other threads and you were clearly conflating comments on issues in Cairo and through out the middle east with Benghazi. You have nothing.
Click to expand...

Again moron... the transcripts say exactly what I said they did. You are simply trying to ignore what was actually said in favor of the narrative you WANT to have happened. I am not conflating the two. You are.
 
Where oh where has the dumb fuck 'surgeon' ran off to?

Question for the dummies?

WHO WAS SENDING GADDAFI SUSPECTED AL QUEDA TERRORISTS TO TORTURE?

You are too dumb to know the answer so I'll give it to you.

THE UNITED STATES AND THE UK.

He was praised by both for it and the people he jailed were AL Queda and terrorists .. who the so-called 'rebels' immediately freed uopn the fall of Gaddafi.

Dumb ass people don't know that.

Another question for dumb people.

WAS THE UN ABOUT TO BESTOW AN AWARD ON GADDAFI BEFORE THE NATO INVASION?

ANSWER: YES. An award for HUMAN RIGHTS and opportunity for WOMEN.

In fact, Libya was the most open society for WOMEN in the entire arab world.

As usual, I can back up every fucking thing I say .. but dumb people aren't interested in truth .. do your own research.
 
the lybian people started a revolt against their dictator.


He treated some well and others not so well.

when it comes right down to it I think any people who attempt to heave a dictator should see support from those who claim to believe in demoracy
 
Not sure what you expect for an 'answer'.....

In 1998, the United States Congress passed and President Bill Clinton signed the "Iraq Liberation Act". The act made it official U.S. policy to "support efforts to remove Saddam Hussein from power..." although it did not authorize the use of United States Armed Forces."

Before the election in 2000...Republicans called for "full implementation" of the Iraq Liberation Act and removal of Saddam Hussein...so there was no surprise there.

As Obama said in 2007, "The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack (as he did on Libya) in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation"....

The October NIE, authored by the 14 intelligence agencys was made known to the Congress.
Congress was called on to debate and vote on "AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002".
Nothing ambiguous about it...
Passed by a bi-partisan vote and the rest is history.....

Of course, you already knew all of this, so what kind of answer were you expecting ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top