Weed smokers have better lungs than even non-smokers
- Thread starter tinfoil
- Start date
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
That is not what the study found
What with the altitude there and Amendment 64, Damo should be challenging the Kenyans soon. But he will have to worry about the USADA! Michael Phelps!
It does indicate a very small improvement in lung capacity at lower rates of usage. They have also found that regular mj smokers are half as likely to be obese. You can get a study to say lots of things. What is conclusive from all of them is that mj is rather benign. Anybody that claims otherwise is drinking the wrong kind of koolade.
It does indicate a very small improvement in lung capacity at lower rates of usage. They have also found that regular mj smokers are half as likely to be obese. You can get a study to say lots of things. What is conclusive from all of them is that mj is rather benign. Anybody that claims otherwise is drinking the wrong kind of koolade.
Last edited:
tell you what, I will try to provide more data on this subject. I'll get back to you
Billy the Great Khan
Uwaa OmO
I'll stick to beer. Better for the blood and liver.
better at killing your liver . . .
Billy the Great Khan
Uwaa OmO
In excess yes (well sort of). However in moderation a good beer or glass of wine is good for the body.
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
So smoking 1 joint a day isn't as bad as smoking 20 cigarettes a day? Stunning study. Shocking results. Who woulda thunk?
I wonder if taxpayer funds are responsible for this trash research? And it is in JAMA?
Sad.
I wonder if taxpayer funds are responsible for this trash research? And it is in JAMA?
Sad.
where do you live so i can come to you and blow weed smoke in your face?
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
The same can be said for MJ. In moderation both are good for relieving stress. Neither is benign if used chronically. Though MJ is definately less toxic and less addictive it also has it's adverse affects if abused.
MJ is NOT as addictive as nicotine and the study was designed to consider the average amounts used by both.
I am sure you would be just as upset if the study showed it was as bad for the lungs as tobacco? Or would you prefer that they not do any studies so you can claim ignorance and base it all on stereotypes, i.e., racism?
We could have relied on the anecdotal evidence of people who have experience with both but many drug warriors refuse to listen. "There just dirty lieberal hippies and there evil weed turns them all into communist, just like the fluoridated water and soy protein." Has that been your "considered" opinion?
Liberty
Libertarian Minded
I'll smoke to that!
Where's all the "I'll trade all my liberties, and freedoms away to keep prohibition as law" republicans on this issue? (Dixie?)
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
Billy the Great Khan
Uwaa OmO
I've never argued otherwise, but I find it funny that many of the same people who tout marijuana as a medical cure all also ignore that alcohol has been used medicinally for a few thousand years.
billy, I just use the medical thing with regards to MJ as propaganda I don't really care if it has medical benefits or not. I'm still smoking up. The medicinal aspects are just so we stoners can convince the dumbling proles.
Who really ignores that? There are are some medical benefits to both. That's not a lie.
A lot of the battle is to convince these knee jerk/xenophobic/racist old pricks that MJ is not signifciantly different than their drug of choice or drugs they tolerate and find socially acceptable. So, alcohol is used to show the duplicity of their position.
These pricks know MJ is harmless but they will keep it illegal because it's so profitable. It keeps the private prisons full, the voter roles empty and arms their peeps. Lots of money being made on the 'war on drugs'...you betcha! Business, it's good for America and all that crap.