Who is the real extremist on abortion?

PostmodernProphet said:
true....there used to be two things that drew administrative action......calling someone a pedophile and using the word cunt.....we're currently exploring the parallel....
Click to expand...

We aren't 'exploring' anything. You are simply making a mockery of the Christ you claim to follow, and it's damn funny I must say. :D
 
PostmodernProphet said:
more fucking slander....and from a pair of babykillers to boot!......
Click to expand...

Slander? Only posing possibilities why you are such a neanderthal. You not only disrespect women but you want to control their sex lives. A real little tyrant, aren't ya? I still say some gal de-balled you somewhere along the line. :lol: Did one of your EXs leave you for your best friend saying she wanted a man or does this go back to grade school where a gal laughed hysterically when you asked her to dance?

We're listening......
 
Bijou said:
Well, excuse the beJESUS outta me, I stand corrected!

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

I checked out the BeetleJuiceSippieCup selection. Look what I found! Thought it was appropriate for the abortion thread. :lol: Maybe our Repub friends would like to borrow it.

cultclassicts___874681.jpg
 
bravo said:
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?30048-Abortion-battle-looming/page3

Well, you see, the point is the homeless are already homeless. The abused have already been abused. Abortion prevents that from happening to a human being by stopping the process that is likely to lead to a human being suffering such fate.

Think of it like this. A single woman is requested to return to the doctor's office after having had an examination a few days ago. The doctor tells her she's pregnant and, also, that she has a fatal illness. Life expectancy about two years. Say, for example, aggressive ALS.

She knows if she bears a child it will have neither a mother nor father. It may be adopted but, on the other hand, prospective adopting parents will want to know family history.

So, we have a potential child who will know neither biological parent and should it be fortunate enough to connect with a good family as an adult it faces a higher than normal chance of becoming one of the "People living with the disease become progressively paralyzed due to degeneration of the upper and lower motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord. Eighty per cent of people with ALS die within two to five years of diagnosis– unable to breathe or swallow."
http://www.als.ca/

When a woman knows she will not be able to love and support a child properly and she is well aware of the lack of support society offers she refuses to bring a child into the world to suffer. Hardly what one would consider "convenience".
posted by Apple
------------------------------------------------------------

The sentiment is the same....If a child might be unloved, unhappy, abused, parentless at some time, poor (lack of support), might suffer.....
There is more, but proof is proof.....
-----------------------------------------------------------
Different adjectives but if it quacks like a duck.....
Click to expand...

Unhappy:
Definition: sad

Synonyms:

bleak, bleeding, blue*, bummed out, cheerless, crestfallen, dejected, depressed, despondent, destroyed, disconsolate, dismal, dispirited, down and out, down in the mouth, down*, downbeat, downcast, dragged, dreary, gloomy, grim, heavy-hearted, hurting, in a blue funk, in pain, in the dumps, let-down, long-faced, low, melancholy, mirthless, miserable, mournful, oppressive, put away, ripped, saddened, sorrowful, sorry, teary, troubled
http://thesaurus.com/browse/unhappy

Do you see abused, orphan, abject poverty or predisposed to a deadly genetic illness anywhere on that list?

You can stop quacking. You already laid an egg.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
sure it will....there will be a time when we look back at this era and consider pro-choice advocates the same way we currently consider pro-slavery advocates.....after all, it was once argued that no one except the plantation owner had any right to say who could own who....
Click to expand...

No, we'll look back on this time and the attempted interference the same as we look back on the time when women couldn't vote and contraceptives were illegal. We'll look back on this as the time when certain men felt their manhood was based on how they control women. How old men with shrivelled balls sat in positions of power doing all they could to stick their noses in women's pants and other men, men without power, grasping at the last thing they considered manly; namely, controlling women.

Women, finally in a position where they can freely offer their body to a man without worry of unwanted pregnancy and some men are against that? As Obama said the Republican party is against two people expressing love for each other, in reference to homosexual marriage, and the same applies to their attitude towards women.

Let's not spend tax dollars on aborting a clump of calls. Let's use that money for war where we get to kill real walking and talking people. Let's ensure the clump of cells grows arms and legs so we can blow them off and call it collateral damage. Let's make this fun!

That's how these days will be seen.
 
This says it all:

Let's not spend tax dollars on aborting a clump of calls. Let's use that money for war where we get to kill real walking and talking people. Let's ensure the clump of cells grows arms and legs so we can blow them off and call it collateral damage.
 
Bijou said:
You're being completely bent-over and punked by your party, retard. They trot out this anti-choice horseshit because they depend on the nutter vote. Their only hope in elections is to have the whack-job vote sewn up.

I see you're doing your part!

Did you notice that abortion's still legal? And will be next year, too?

And the next?

Keep toiling, obsesso!

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

LOL That is funny!! The nutter vote.

Considering the amount of nuts in the Repub party perhaps the mascot should be changed from
images
to
images
 
apple0154 said:
LOL That is funny!! The nutter vote.

Considering the amount of nuts in the Repub party perhaps the mascot should be changed from
images
to
images
Click to expand...

They continue to get more whacked - less intelligent, less civilized, etc. It's why they don't believe in evolution, because THEY do not evolve.
 
bravo said:
Not at all what I say but being the typical ass you are, your only recourse is to accuse others of saying what was never said at all.....

......but you said the kid should have been killled in the womb if that MIGHT happen.....you must think you KNOW its gonna happen....

of course all sane people realize we don't know and that the child could just have well to be the doctor that cures cancer or becomes the POTUS someday.....

Under your insane thinking that could never be possible...you'd have him or her killed for just existing......you're an extremest and insane....

If others remember the craziness you posted in the past, they'll come forward if they want....I can't force that issue....
Click to expand...

There's no issue to force. You're full if sh!t, plain and simple. You're just another Repub liar like the way you lied in "The Dictator" thread, post #71 and Christie, post #90, slapped your ass with the truth.

A liar, just like Ryan, concerning his athletic skills. A liar right out of the starting gate. First day nominated.

A liar, just like PiMP.

You're all a bunch of liars. It's a Repub trait.

Cite or STFU. You don't even have sense enough to know you continually show yourself to be a jackass. We have new members like Unk joining us and, quite frankly, it's embarassing they run into you and PiMP, the two lying loud mouths, as soon as they get here. :(
 
bravo said:
And my reason for posting is NOT to stop all abortions.....sometimes I believe it becomes a necessity.....the lesser of two evils.....

My point is to expose Apple as the crazy extremist he is.....killing for no good reason, for any reason, up to and including a child that is outside the womb and has
survived an abortion........because something bad MIGHT happen to the child in the future....like hes playing God.......

The kid MIGHT starve, MIGHT be abused, MIGHT get a deadly sickness, MIGHT be raised in poverty...MIGHT MIGHT MIGHT.....
Click to expand...

More bullsh!t.

Cite where I said "killing.....a child that is outside the womb"

You're making yourself a laughing stock here. Accusation after accusation and not one cite. You cry like a baby hoping some of your loser friends will come to your rescue. Don't wait for that to happen because there is no proof.

More lies. More bullsh!t. No proof. No cite. :palm:
 
apple0154 said:
More bullsh!t.

Cite where I said "killing.....a child that is outside the womb"

You're making yourself a laughing stock here. Accusation after accusation and not one cite. You cry like a baby hoping some of your loser friends will come to your rescue. Don't wait for that to happen because there is no proof.

More lies. More bullsh!t. No proof. No cite. :palm:
Click to expand...

"Bravo is citing verifiable FACTS," said no one, ever. :D
 
Bijou said:
Good for you for having a modicum of sensibility.



Your post fails miserably in that endeavour. Apple isn't at all crazy or extreme. His stance regarding bringing an unwanted child into a world doomed to poverty and myriad unsavory circumstances common to dysfunction and unfitness for parenthood makes perfect sense in the real world; it doesn't play well to the religious whack jobs - and while we're being real, it is THEY who are 'playing god' by insisting that a life created by someone's negligence, rape or irresponsibility is somehow 'sacred' - who are still stuck in two centuries ago and believe women need to be dictated to and dominated.



No. If a child is born to an unfit parent who doesn't want it, it WILL suffer. WILL. The evidence for this reality abounds.
Click to expand...

With people like Bravo it's not about the fetus or the fertilized cells. It's about domination. Either no abortions or they will decide when an abortion is necessary. Just like that other wacko Republican that said in instances of "real" rape the woman de-fertilizes the cell or some stupid nonsense like that. The egg turns around and runs back up the fallopian tube and the game of cat and mouse ensues. :rofl2: It's just like in real life. You know, the man chases the woman and the woman only gets caught if she wants to get caught. Same thing with the egg.

It's marvellous what science has taught us. :wha:
 
bravo said:
So you're a fortune teller too....YOU KNOW the kid will suffer, so kill before it MIGHT happen....you're nuts too....
If the parents...both of them, don't want it....give it to someone that does......that we'll happily pay for as we already do.....

You think kids raised in poverty don't deserve to live...you kill a child because the parent is 'unfit'.....you're the judge, jury and executioner ?....and yes, life is sacred....
You don't even treat dogs and cats that way.....
Click to expand...

Quite the contrary. This just goes to show how little you know. When there is a food shortage animals are known to kill their young because they know their young will starve to death. And when animals are severely injured we, as human beings, put them out of their misery but we insist people keep living even with diseases like ALS where they have to be watched so they don't choke to death due to their inablilty to swallow properly. And then we'll put a feeding tube in them and keep them alive as they further deteriorate. And when they beg their doctor to end their misery we say, "No. Suffer! It's God's will." That is the current level of perversion of the society in which we live. That is the perversion you support.
 
apple0154 said:
No, we'll look back on this time and the attempted interference the same as we look back on the time when women couldn't vote and contraceptives were illegal. We'll look back on this as the time when certain men felt their manhood was based on how they control women. How old men with shrivelled balls sat in positions of power doing all they could to stick their noses in women's pants and other men, men without power, grasping at the last thing they considered manly; namely, controlling women.

Women, finally in a position where they can freely offer their body to a man without worry of unwanted pregnancy and some men are against that? As Obama said the Republican party is against two people expressing love for each other, in reference to homosexual marriage, and the same applies to their attitude towards women.

Let's not spend tax dollars on aborting a clump of calls. Let's use that money for war where we get to kill real walking and talking people. Let's ensure the clump of cells grows arms and legs so we can blow them off and call it collateral damage. Let's make this fun!

That's how these days will be seen.
Click to expand...

You do know that there are a lot of women who are pro life right? You seem to want to position this as a man issue. Why lie?

I sure hope that clump of cells you are calling a grandchild makes it. Maybe there should be a miscarriage so it is spared you whacko ideology. Shouldn't matter because it is only a clump of cells right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top