Who is the real extremist on abortion?
- Thread starter canceled.2021.1
- Start date
My food's not here yet.
Well, see; this is why we can't have nice things. We keep breaking all the good ones, and we're left with this one-armed, one-legged, crotchless loser.
So abused and starved is synonymous with "a child who won't be happy"? Typical Republican. A child that has been malnourished and raped should just tough it up and get on with life when they reach 18. That's the Repub definition of caring.
If incorrect, cite. No bullshit. No "at least 15 members". Cite or STFU and STFD.
Not at all what I say but being the typical ass you are, your only recourse is to accuse others of saying what was never said at all.....
......but you said the kid should have been killled in the womb if that MIGHT happen.....you must think you KNOW its gonna happen....
of course all sane people realize we don't know and that the child could just have well to be the doctor that cures cancer or becomes the POTUS someday.....
Under your insane thinking that could never be possible...you'd have him or her killed for just existing......you're an extremest and insane....
If others remember the craziness you posted in the past, they'll come forward if they want....I can't force that issue....
Last edited:
And my reason for posting is NOT to stop all abortions.....sometimes I believe it becomes a necessity.....the lesser of two evils.....
My point is to expose Apple as the crazy extremist he is.....killing for no good reason, for any reason, up to and including a child that is outside the womb and has
survived an abortion........because something bad MIGHT happen to the child in the future....like hes playing God.......
The kid MIGHT starve, MIGHT be abused, MIGHT get a deadly sickness, MIGHT be raised in poverty...MIGHT MIGHT MIGHT.....
My point is to expose Apple as the crazy extremist he is.....killing for no good reason, for any reason, up to and including a child that is outside the womb and has
survived an abortion........because something bad MIGHT happen to the child in the future....like hes playing God.......
The kid MIGHT starve, MIGHT be abused, MIGHT get a deadly sickness, MIGHT be raised in poverty...MIGHT MIGHT MIGHT.....
Good for you for having a modicum of sensibility.
Your post fails miserably in that endeavour. Apple isn't at all crazy or extreme. His stance regarding bringing an unwanted child into a world doomed to poverty and myriad unsavory circumstances common to dysfunction and unfitness for parenthood makes perfect sense in the real world; it doesn't play well to the religious whack jobs - and while we're being real, it is THEY who are 'playing god' by insisting that a life created by someone's negligence, rape or irresponsibility is somehow 'sacred' - who are still stuck in two centuries ago and believe women need to be dictated to and dominated.
No. If a child is born to an unfit parent who doesn't want it, it WILL suffer. WILL. The evidence for this reality abounds.
Speaking as a child who should have been aborted? He's right.
Humans were made to, and meant to have sex. Not having sex is the unnatural part, especially among the young. "Just Say No?" Okay. Well - I tried, and I got raped. Other than that, just saying no didn't actually cross my mind once the hormones took over.
Not much of anybody is being honest here about abstinence.
So you're a fortune teller too....YOU KNOW the kid will suffer, so kill before it MIGHT happen....you're nuts too....
If the parents...both of them, don't want it....give it to someone that does......that we'll happily pay for as we already do.....
You think kids raised in poverty don't deserve to live...you kill a child because the parent is 'unfit'.....you're the judge, jury and executioner ?....and yes, life is sacred....
You don't even treat dogs and cats that way.....
There's no point in discussing this issue with you because you insist on deliberately misinterpreting what I posit so that you can be 'right'.
well no, partial birth abortion/ late term abortions are illegal in most states.
The question has always come down to the viability of the fetus, not choice. If it were about choice then late term abortions would be legal as well. they are not.
I've already had this discussion with you and already demonstrated why you're wrong.
It's about choice 100%. The window is plenty large enough to CHOOSE within the 20-week, pre-viability window.
This thread was started to show Obama's approval of killing a viable, breathing, moving child already outside the womb should be killed because that was the intent
in the first place......think about that kind of lack of compassion.....
Get over yourself. It's about CHOICE - the mother's. Not YOURS.
No. I'm not.
The woman is. She gets to choose what happens in her body. And pregnancy is no cakewalk. It's actually quite dangerous. So who are you to demand she go through all that as - what? Punishment for being sexually active?
You're not God. Not even close.
No thanks. I'll think about the kind of compassion that demands she go through a pregnancy, even if caused by rape, incest or when the life of the mother is at risk, while simultaneously attempting to remove all safety nets.
You know. The Republican 'compassion.'
Why is controlling the decisions of others such a compulsion for you?