Canceled.2014.1
New member
Playing video games.
I don't care for them. I don't find them interesting.
Playing video games.
You haven't tried any in years, have you?
Strangely, you don't seem to know whether or not an uninteresting activity you claim not to have engaged in for years hones razor-sharp combat shooting skills.
Yet you boasted that you would have done better than two police officers whose training you are ignorant of.
"Back to"?
Nope. But you seem to know a lot about video games, considering that you claim not to find them interesting, and said you hadn't played any in years.
So you would have done better, yet you aren't boasting?
Don't you know?
What have you seen? Earlier, you said the video quality was so bad you couldn't see what stance the officers used.
Yet you divined the details you wanted to see in your rush to judgment?
So you can prove the NYPD is covering up evidence in this case?
You lose the bet.
I do? When did I say they were well-trained?
Asking you questions after you boasted that you would have done a better job is harassment?
Not harassing?
I don't know.
Why haven't you clicked on the poll option "Yes, I would not have wounded any bystanders", since that is your boast?
So you are content to boast without voting?
Your boasting is evident.
So you say.
So you said.
That's because you are.
You haven't voted.
Not by voting in it.
While 8 ft is pretty close, I'm not sure that classifies as "point blank"; plus the two Policeman appeared to be backing up.Add to it that they were almost at point blank range.
The veteran patrolmen who opened fire on the suit-clad gunman, Jeffrey Johnson, had only an instant to react when he whirled around and pointed a .45-caliber pistol at them as they approached from behind on a busy sidewalk...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...8720e2-eedf-11e1-afd8-097e90f99d05_story.html
While 8 ft is pretty close, I'm not sure that classifies as "point blank"; plus the two Policeman appeared to be backing up.