Fatal shooting at Denver screening of The Dark Knight Rises

I found this in Yahoo Answers and it pretty much sums up how sane people view the subject.

http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120721030237AAkbeaI
that is not the opinion of sane people, it's the opinion of idiotic people. It is completely implausible that the founding fathers of this country, who had just shed themselves of a tyrannical central government and military that was bent on oppressing them, would come close to any conception that they would then create an amendment that restricted their new central government (one that was not to be completely trusted) from restricting the arms of a new military that could also become oppressive, much like the one they just defeated.

To think the above is pure lunacy and should require any idiot thinking such nonsense to be forced in to grade school again.
 
that is not the opinion of sane people, it's the opinion of idiotic people. It is completely implausible that the founding fathers of this country, who had just shed themselves of a tyrannical central government and military that was bent on oppressing them, would come close to any conception that they would then create an amendment that restricted their new central government (one that was not to be completely trusted) from restricting the arms of a new military that could also become oppressive, much like the one they just defeated.

To think the above is pure lunacy and should require any idiot thinking such nonsense to be forced in to grade school again.

You're whacked and so is your hero.
It turns out Stewart Rhodes, the Yale-educated lawyer who founded the Oath Keepers to encourage police and military personnel to disobey orders they deem unconstitutional, has a hard time following the rules of conduct for lawyers.

Hatewatch has learned that the State Bar of Arizona has admonished Rhodes for practicing without a license. Rhodes wrote “notices of claim” on behalf of two people who were removed from a Quartzsite, Ariz., Town Council meeting last year. The notices, which generally precede a lawsuit, accused town officials of violating the rights of Michael Roth and Jennifer Jade Jones, a local blogger, by removing the pair from a raucous council meeting that sparked national interest and widespread theorizing from the antigovernment “Patriot” movement.

“There was no justifiable reason my client should have endured being singled out for political reprisal, first amendment retaliation and subjected to false arrest,” Rhodes wrote in one notice seeking $350,000 in damages for Roth. “It is apparent that the actions of the officers were retaliatory and meant to punish, degrade, intimidate and harass".

http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?s=stewart+rhodes&submit

:rofl2:
 
Hey 'Oath' man - do you know this guy? Friend of yours?

Oklahoma Oath Keeper Convicted of 6-Year-Old Daughter’s Rape

In the end, the antigovernment rhetoric that so energized his defense couldn’t save Charles Dyer, the former Marine and member of the antigovernment Oath Keepers organization accused of raping his own 6-year-old daughter. Late Thursday, after four hours of deliberation, a Duncan, Okla., jury convicted Dyer and recommended a 30-year sentence.

The rest:
http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2012/04/20/oklahoma-oath-keeper-convicted-of-rape/
 
that is not the opinion of sane people, it's the opinion of idiotic people. It is completely implausible that the founding fathers of this country, who had just shed themselves of a tyrannical central government and military that was bent on oppressing them, would come close to any conception that they would then create an amendment that restricted their new central government (one that was not to be completely trusted) from restricting the arms of a new military that could also become oppressive, much like the one they just defeated.

To think the above is pure lunacy and should require any idiot thinking such nonsense to be forced in to grade school again.

With grammar like that, I'm hoping you're at the front of the line.
 
I notice that the dipshit gun hating liberals had to resort to character assassination and grammar nazi tactics. I WIN!!!!!!!!!

No one assassinated your hero's character, oath-man. He did that on his own, with his own whack-job actions. Your hero. :rofl2:

Hey - is the rapist of 6-year olds a pal of yours?
 
No one assassinated your hero's character, oath-man. He did that on his own, with his own whack-job actions. Your hero. :rofl2:

Hey - is the rapist of 6-year olds a pal of yours?

your character assassination was your pitiful attempt to compare he and I as associates or pals, or even him as my hero. that's how you fail.
 
A bit of background on oath-man's hero (below). It certainly sheds some light on our own oath-man and his colourful imagination:

Elmer Stewart Rhodes

Stewart-Rhodes.jpg


With all the paranoia he peddles to the conspiracy class, it’s hard to believe Stewart Rhodes once had a career shooting straight for the stratosphere.

But since retiring from the Army and in 2009 starting the Oath Keepers — a defiant “Patriot” organization of active military and police personnel who vow to uphold their oaths to the U.S. Constitution against all enemies, foreign, domestic and imagined — the Yale-educated lawyer has emerged as one of the primary intellectual fountainheads of the antigovernment right.

Under the defiant banner of “Not on our watch,” Rhodes has recruited thousands of politically disaffected men and women into the Oath Keepers. He has plied them with ideas of a tyrannical “New World Order” looming on the horizon, only to dismiss those worries as mere theoretical concerns when it is convenient to do so — typically, when trying to paint the group as mainstream in discussions with reporters. It’s doublespeak at its finest.

For example, he told MSNBC’s Chris Matthews that he wasn’t animated by conspiracy theories or fears.

But when speaking to radio conspiracist Alex Jones (see profile above), Rhodes touted the benefits of his new organization by playing to one of Jones’ key worries. “We know that if the day should come where a full-blown dictatorship would come, or tyranny … it can happen [only] if those men, our brothers in arms, go along and comply with unconstitutional, unlawful orders. … Imagine if we focus on the police and military. Game over for the New World Order,” Rhodes said.

A practicing attorney in Nevada, Rhodes left his legal practice in 2010 to move to the Big Sky State. He wasted no time involving himself with the growing local Patriot movement, which has been drawn to Montana for what constitutionalist preacher Chuck Baldwin (see profile above) has called “the Alamo of the 21st Century” — a last stand against a perceived dismantling of American freedoms.

The core of the Oath Keepers is its 10 “Orders We Will Not Obey.” The orders relate directly to Patriot fears of a government conspiracy — alleged plans to impose martial law, shuttle Americans into concentration camps and so on. Rhodes has warned that the government is teetering on the brink and has encouraged residents in Flathead County, Mont., to begin forming citizen militias.

“It’s not that the iceberg is coming. … We already hit the iceberg,” Rhodes was quoted saying during a speech after arriving in Montana. And how does that play out in one of the Ivy League’s most conspiratorial minds? He put it quite simply: “The Titanic is going down.”
 
your character assassination was your pitiful attempt to compare he and I as associates or pals, or even him as my hero. that's how you fail.

The rapist isn't your hero, Stewart Rhodes is your hero. He's the founder of Oath Keepers.

I asked if Dyer, the rapist, is your pal. ASKED. You've yet to answer.
 
The rapist isn't your hero, Stewart Rhodes is your hero. He's the founder of Oath Keepers.

I asked if Dyer, the rapist, is your pal. ASKED. You've yet to answer.
your sources are extremely suspect and unreliable. the southern poverty lies center isn't worth responding to.
 
Back
Top