Cancel 2016.11
Darla
Hmm, then I guess, by that criteria, I will be called a woman hater. Damn shame.
If you believe that bs then you have bigger problems.
Hmm, then I guess, by that criteria, I will be called a woman hater. Damn shame.
Hmm, then I guess, by that criteria, I will be called a woman hater. Damn shame.
that is not the opinion of sane people, it's the opinion of idiotic people. It is completely implausible that the founding fathers of this country, who had just shed themselves of a tyrannical central government and military that was bent on oppressing them, would come close to any conception that they would then create an amendment that restricted their new central government (one that was not to be completely trusted) from restricting the arms of a new military that could also become oppressive, much like the one they just defeated.I found this in Yahoo Answers and it pretty much sums up how sane people view the subject.
http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120721030237AAkbeaI
that is not the opinion of sane people, it's the opinion of idiotic people. It is completely implausible that the founding fathers of this country, who had just shed themselves of a tyrannical central government and military that was bent on oppressing them, would come close to any conception that they would then create an amendment that restricted their new central government (one that was not to be completely trusted) from restricting the arms of a new military that could also become oppressive, much like the one they just defeated.
To think the above is pure lunacy and should require any idiot thinking such nonsense to be forced in to grade school again.
It turns out Stewart Rhodes, the Yale-educated lawyer who founded the Oath Keepers to encourage police and military personnel to disobey orders they deem unconstitutional, has a hard time following the rules of conduct for lawyers.
Hatewatch has learned that the State Bar of Arizona has admonished Rhodes for practicing without a license. Rhodes wrote “notices of claim” on behalf of two people who were removed from a Quartzsite, Ariz., Town Council meeting last year. The notices, which generally precede a lawsuit, accused town officials of violating the rights of Michael Roth and Jennifer Jade Jones, a local blogger, by removing the pair from a raucous council meeting that sparked national interest and widespread theorizing from the antigovernment “Patriot” movement.
“There was no justifiable reason my client should have endured being singled out for political reprisal, first amendment retaliation and subjected to false arrest,” Rhodes wrote in one notice seeking $350,000 in damages for Roth. “It is apparent that the actions of the officers were retaliatory and meant to punish, degrade, intimidate and harass".
that is not the opinion of sane people, it's the opinion of idiotic people. It is completely implausible that the founding fathers of this country, who had just shed themselves of a tyrannical central government and military that was bent on oppressing them, would come close to any conception that they would then create an amendment that restricted their new central government (one that was not to be completely trusted) from restricting the arms of a new military that could also become oppressive, much like the one they just defeated.
To think the above is pure lunacy and should require any idiot thinking such nonsense to be forced in to grade school again.
I notice that the dipshit gun hating liberals had to resort to character assassination and grammar nazi tactics. I WIN!!!!!!!!!
I notice that the dipshit gun hating liberals
resort to character assassination
I LOSE!!!!!!!!!
No one assassinated your hero's character, oath-man. He did that on his own, with his own whack-job actions. Your hero.
Hey - is the rapist of 6-year olds a pal of yours?
your character assassination was your pitiful attempt to compare he and I as associates or pals, or even him as my hero. that's how you fail.
awesome, more character assassination. more proof that you lost the whole argument.
your sources are extremely suspect and unreliable. the southern poverty lies center isn't worth responding to.The rapist isn't your hero, Stewart Rhodes is your hero. He's the founder of Oath Keepers.
I asked if Dyer, the rapist, is your pal. ASKED. You've yet to answer.
Nope, you lost the argument last night. All that's happening today is that your hero, organization and ideology are being shown to be pure unadulterated lunacy.
your sources are extremely suspect and unreliable. the southern poverty lies center isn't worth responding to.