No, "data" and "reports" are fine, in context. You were supposed to explain exactly how they derived the "saved jobs" number, and your profound explanation was "reports and data" ...nothing further. I contend they pulled the numbers out of their ass. And now, you want to spin that whole argument into me being proven wrong and you proving yourself right, and that simply didn't happen in the universe I am in. You couldn't ever explain your answer, or offer any evidence to support your arguments, and now here you are, trying to smart off about some kind of 'victory' you had on the subject... must be something like your wet dreams, huh?