People need food, they don't need wind turbines. There is more than enough gas and oil from fracking, coupled with nuclear to sustain energy requirements in the transitional period.
Sent from my iPhone 10S
Ah but it is the cost, waste and risks of those that are driving alternative forms which can be potentially more efficient. Why the bias for organic fossil fuels? Why the opposition to even developing alternatives when it is free market forces that are driving the developments of those technologies? Why the insistence on technologies that are wasteful, pollute and/or dangerous?