View RSS Feed

State of Mankind

Remedy for Election Fraud

Rate this Entry

Remedy for Election Vote Fraud Is Found in the Constitution and the People
Commentary by Scott S. Powell
November 19, 2020; Updated November 20, 2020

The only source of legitimacy of government in America is from the people.

At the time of the founding of the United States, Samuel Adams stated, “Let each citizen remember at the moment he is offering his vote that … he is executing one of the most solemn trusts in human society for which he is accountable to God and his country.”

At a turning point in the survival of the nation after the Civil War’s bloodiest battle, Abraham Lincoln delivered the Gettysburg Address, stating that “this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

Fast forward to the present, two years into Donald Trump’s Presidency, almost exactly two years before she passed away, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg reminded us on Sept. 17, 2018 that “We have the oldest written constitution still in force in the world, and it starts out with three words, ‘We, the people.’”

It is absolutely necessary to investigate vote counting irregularities and ballot fraud in states with a high incidence because honest elections are the only source of legitimacy of the U.S. government. Because that legitimacy only comes from the people, it would be a fundamental betrayal of who we are—a sort of national suicide—to allow massive vote counting irregularities and ballot fraud in multiple states to stand.

The American people have already endured two major efforts at a coup d’état against President Trump. The first being the Russia collusion conspiracy based on a fabricated Russian dossier originating with Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, which was then promoted by CIA director John Brennan, FBI director James Comey, and others. The second was the failed impeachment launched by Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, and the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives.

Since there have been neither results nor penalties from these previous coup attempts, which in the first case was unconstitutional and seditious, it’s no surprise that Democratic Party leaders were emboldened to make a third coup attempt by taking advantage of the Coronavirus lockdowns and public fear to increase the odds of victory on Nov. 3. First they legitimized the wholesale expansion of mail-in balloting, and then they blanketed the swing states with armies of lawyers filing suits to challenge voter ID laws, signature verification laws and, more than anything else, extend the deadlines for mail-in ballots—all of which opened the door to massive vote fraud.

All of the swing states with contested outcomes use polling place technology provided by a company called Dominion Voting Systems. It’s a known fact that a source code error in Dominion’s software flipped 6,000 seats from Trump to Biden in Michigan and also shut down ballot casting in two Georgia counties in the morning of Nov. 3. Were there other problems that went unreported?

Dominion Voting Systems was rejected three times by Texas data communications experts because it failed to meet basic security standards. So now the concerns about something known as the “The Hammer” and “The Scorecard” by Sidney Powell, the lead defense attorney for Lt. General Michael Flynn who now heads up Trump’s electronic vote fraud investigation make sense. Originally developed by the CIA to affect foreign elections and now controlled by Democrat Party operatives, the Hammer and the Scorecard is a computer-software system that can access weak voting machine computer networks and change votes at the point of data transfer between voting stations and data storage hubs.

Thus the “fix” to assure a Biden victory and a Trump defeat may have been in and would have likely taken place after vote counting and poll watching was shut down in the wee hours of Nov. 4. Dennis Montgomery, the CIA contractor who developed the Hammer and the Scorecard, who became a whistleblower in 2015, reports that states like Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Arizona all exhibit vote tally change patterns that reflect manipulation by the Hammer and Scorecard.

To build a legal case proving vote fraud affected the outcome of the Nov. 3 election, Defense Intelligence Agency computer engineers need to gain access to the respective states’ voting tabulation and storage technology to investigate whether the Hammer and the Scorecard was deployed. At the same time the Republican legal team members must continue their investigations of all other manner and scope of voter fraud. Since national election vote count is normally certified in December, things must happen fast.

With distrust and division being so extreme in the present environment, if there is evidence of massive vote fraud in a given state, the Supreme Court is compelled to adjudicate. If the decision requires the disqualification of the popular vote, the remedy is fortunately in the Constitution, which puts the vote in the hands of the state legislatures, whose members were elected by the people and whose vote would govern the state’s electoral college vote. The other remedy for massive electoral fraud would be to call a new election to be conducted with bipartisan supervision at every stage in the states where the Court finds that fraud invalidates the Nov. 3 results.

The American people cannot allow fraudulent election results or even the appearance of such to stand. It undermines the Constitution and demoralizes the citizenry. And while some Americans might choose denial and turning a blind eye to avoid acknowledging the existence of vote fraud, the world is watching to see what we do. Letting proven election and vote fraud stand is a choice that destroys the nation’s moral authority and relegates the United States to the status of banana republics and communist regimes.

A corrective is imperative, and the remedy is not found in some postmodern rationalization, but rather in the Constitution that provides a course of action that restores an unassailable sovereignty of the people. Justice Ginsberg reminds us from her grave that our Constitution is worth upholding and its sole authority comes from “We the People”—that is the voters, not the vote counters.

Scott S. Powell is a legal recruiter and senior fellow at the Discovery Institute. Reach him at

Submit "Remedy for Election Fraud" to Digg Submit "Remedy for Election Fraud" to Submit "Remedy for Election Fraud" to StumbleUpon Submit "Remedy for Election Fraud" to Google

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags