https://spectator.org/why-the-dems-w...-trump-voters/
Originally Posted by Cancel 2018.1 Originally Posted by midcan5 As noted in the thread on Robert E.Lee, conservatives and republicans are very similar to Russians in that history must be revised constantly. Saints are rare in politics on both sides of the aisle but the republicans and their apologists are simply dishonest as well. "You start out in 1954 by saying, “Nig-ger, nig-ger, nig-ger.” By 1968 you can’t say “nig-ger” — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states’ rights and all that stuff. You’re getting ...
Originally Posted by anonymoose Originally Posted by lying rules lmao pretty close. lets fill it in "I am always [perplexed/confused/intrigued] My theory is [something smug, dismissive, lazy and lacking nuance] Of course, as we all know [list a reason why I am better] [optional conclusion that cypress thinks is witty]!" I will save your post and use it for future reference.
Originally Posted by anonymoose Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople I think this is a good way of discussing the dangers of politicizing science. Certainly when the discussion of science denial is brought up it is used pejoratively to accuse conservatives of denying scientific consensus. Teaching evolutionary theory and climate change are probably the big two hot button topic that most are familiar with. However my readings on many posters in political message boards and listening and reading political polemicist I've found that science denial often ...
Originally Posted by Nordberg Originally Posted by anonymoose If it's coming out "soon" then Mueller's run out of people's lives to ruin. I seriously doubt any report is coming "soon" because Mueller still has waterboarding to do on Roger Stone before Stone is financially ruined from legal bills, plus this so called report will be timed with the primaries or the gen. election to do the most damage to Trump politically. You're kidding, right? It will be scathing to Trump . Something like "trump was grossly negligent ...
Originally Posted by Micawber I think it will prove a conspiracy to subvert the election with Russia and Trump's campaign and be non committal whether or not Trump was in the know, and directly implicate Trump in campaign finance violations and make a reference to the IRS for collection stemming from Trump's money laundering and tax evasion.