PDA

View Full Version : Dispensationalism



kudzu
06-19-2018, 03:16 AM
Dispensationalism

Dispensationalism is a theological system that teaches biblical history is best understood in light of a number of successive administrations of God's dealings with mankind, which it calls "dispensations."

It maintains fundamental distinctions between God's plans for national Israel and for the New Testament Church, and emphasizes prophecy of the end-times and a pre-tribulation rapture of the church prior to Christ's Second Coming. Its beginnings are usually associated with the Plymouth Brethren movement in the UK and the teachings of John Nelson Darby.

History

The Plymouth Brethren movement, basically a reaction against the established church in England and its ecclesiology, became known for its anti-denominational, anti-clerical, and anti-credal stance. While theologically orthodox, the Plymouth Brethren (Darby in particular) developed unique ideas regarding the interpretation of Scripture while emphasizing prophecy and the second coming of Christ.

The theology of this movement became known as "Dispensationalism."

This new teaching spread in America through prophecy conferences such as the Niagara Bible Conferences (1883-1897). James H. Brookes (1830-1898), a pastor in St. Louis and prominent figure in the Niagara Conferences, disseminated dispensationalist ideas through his ministry and publications.

Most importantly, Dwight L. Moody was sympathetic to the broad outlines of dispensationalism and had as his closest lieutenants dispensationalist leaders such as Reuben A. Torrey (1856-1928), James M. Gray (1851-1925), Cyrus I. Scofield (1843-1921), William J. Eerdman (1833-1923), A. C. Dixon (1854-1925), and A. J. Gordon (1836-1895).

These men were activist evangelists who promoted a host of Bible conferences and other missionary and evangelistic efforts.

They also gave the dispensationalist movement institutional permanence by assuming leadership of the new independent Bible institutes such as the Moody Bible Institute (1886), the Bible Institute of Los Angeles (1907), and the Philadelphia College of the Bible (1914).

The network of related institutes that soon sprang up became the nucleus for the spread of American dispensationalism.

continued

https://www.theopedia.com/dispensationalism

kudzu
06-19-2018, 03:46 AM
Theology

The dispensations
the dispensation of innocence (or freedom), (Gen. 2:8-17,25), prior to Adam's fall,
of conscience, (Gen. 3:10-18; Rom. 2:11-15), Adam to Noah,
of government, (Gen. 9:6; Rom. 13:1), Noah to Abraham,
of patriarchal rule (or promise), (Gen. 12:1-3; 22:17-18; Gal. 3:15-19), Abraham to Moses,
of the Mosaic Law, (Ex. 20:1-26; Gal. 3:19), Moses to Christ,
of grace, (Rom. 5:20-21; Eph. 3:1-9), the current church age, and
of a literal earthly 1,000 year Millennial Kingdom that has yet to come but soon will, (Is. 9:6-7; 11:1-9; Rev. 20:1-6).

Each one of these dispensations is said to represent a different way in which God deals with man, specifically a different testing for man. "These periods are marked off in Scripture by some change in God's method of dealing with mankind, in respect to two questions: of sin, and of man's responsibility," explained C. I. Scofield. "Each of the dispensations may be regarded as a new test of the natural man, and each ends in judgment - marking his utter failure in every dispensation."

The idea of different "dispensations" may be found in the writings of some of the early church fathers, and viewing the flow of biblical history as a series of "dispensations" may be seen in some works that pre-date Darby's dispensationalism, such as L'OEconomie Divine by Pierre Poiret (1646-1719). But these earlier works did not include the unique testing/failure motif described by Scofield or any hint of the underlying tenets of Darby's dispensationalism.

Beliefs about the Church and Israel

In addition to these dispensations, the real theological significance can be seen in four basic tenets which underlie classic dispensational teaching. Dispensationalism maintains:

a fundamental distinction between Israel and the church, i.e. there are two peoples of God with two different destinies, earthly Israel and the spiritual church, ^[1]^
a fundamental distinction between the Law and Grace, i.e. they are mutually exclusive ideas, ^[2]^
the view that the New Testament church is a parenthesis in God's plan which was not foreseen by the Old Testament, ^[3]^ and
a distinction between the Rapture and the Second Coming of Christ, i.e. the rapture of the church at Christ's coming "in the air" (1 Thess. 4:17) precedes the "official" second coming (to the earth) by 7 years of tribulation.

kudzu
06-19-2018, 03:47 AM
These tenets are supposedly derived from the dispensationalists' insistence on "consistent literalism" in their hermeneutic, especially in the literal interpretation of OT prophecies regarding Israel.^[4]^ Crucial to the dispensationalist reading of biblical prophecy, drawn principally from Daniel and Revelation, but also, to some degree, from Ezekiel, is the assertion that the Jewish Temple will be rebuilt on the Temple Mount as a precursor to the Lord returning to restore the earthly Kingdom of Israel centered on Jerusalem. The dispensational movement was therefore fueled by the re-establishment of the state of Israel in 1948. It has grown in popularity particularly since 1967, coinciding with the Arab-Israeli Six Day War, and a few years later in 1970 with the publication of Hal Lindsey's blockbuster book The Late Great Planet Earth.

Dispensationalism teaches that the Second Coming of Jesus Christ will be a physical event, by which a world-wide kingdom will be established in human history, geographically centered in Jerusalem. Dispensationalists teach that the Second Coming will be a two step process. In the first step, Christ returns to resurrect the blessed dead and rapture the living believers from the Earth. After this, a seven year period of tribulation occurs, climaxing in the Battle of Armageddon. In the second step, Christ intervenes at the Battle of Armageddon and establishes a literal 1000-year millennial kingdom on earth. As such, some Dispensationalists are often associated with the circulation of end times prophecy, which professes to read omens of the Second Coming in current events; however, other Dispensationalists have criticized this apocalypticism popularized by authors such as Hal Lindsey.

Premillennialism and dispensationalism
By way of clarification, it should be noted that while all dispensationalists are by definition premillennial in their eschatology, not all premillennialists are dispensational in their theology. Historic Premillennialism (e.g. in George Eldon Ladd) rejects pre-tribulationalism, dispensationalism's radical tenets, and its uniquely Jewish view of the 1000 year millennium. Historic premillennialism may be traced back to some of the early church fathers where it was sometimes termed "chiliasm."

See main article Premillennialism.

Dispensational theology in Christianity at large

Prior to dispensationalism, Covenant theology was the prominent Protestant view regarding redemptive history and is still the view of the Reformed churches. A relatively recent view, which is seen as a third alternative, especially among Calvinistic Baptists, is called New Covenant Theology. Outside of Protestantism, however, other Christian branches (e.g., Eastern Orthodoxy, Oriental Orthodoxy, or Roman Catholicism) have not embraced any form of dispensationalism.

Progressive dispensationalism

"Progressive Dispensationalism" by Blaising and Bock (Baker Books, 1993) introduced a movement showing that progressives within the dispensationalist camp have resolved many of the issues upon which classic Dispensational theology has been attacked -- especially by Reformed theology. However, some have questioned whether these progressives, having abandoned certain crucial tenets, can fairly continue to call themselves dispensationalists at all.^[5]^

See main article Progressive dispensationalism.

Acts 28 and Mid-Acts dispensationalism

Other varieties of dispensationalism include the "Acts-28 Dispensationalism" of E. W. Bullinger (1837-1913) and the Acts-13, or Mid-Acts, Dispensationalists, represented by J. C. O'Hair, C. R. Stam (Things That Differ), and Charles F. Baker (A Dispensational Theology). The latter group also refers to itself as "The Grace Movement." These varieties are discussed in the main article on Hyper-dispensationalism.

Notes

↑ Ryrie, C.C., Dispensationalism (Moody Press, 1995), 39-40.
↑ Scofield, C.I., Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth, ch. 6, pp. 34, 36.
↑ Walvoord, J., The Millennial Kingdom (Zondervan, 1959) 227.
↑ Ryrie, C.C., Dispensationalism Today (Moody Press, 1965) 97.
↑ Zola Levitt and Dr. Thomas McCall, "The distinctions between the church and Israel are purposely blurred, and the doctrine seems to move in the direction of Amillennialism which, of course, does away with the Pre-Tribulation Rapture, the whole Millennial Kingdom, the importance of modern Israel and virtually all of the basics of accurate eschatological teaching. They claim to be Dispensationalists, but have gutted Dispensationalism of some of its most important concepts." The Levitt Letter February 2000: Volume 22, Number 2.
Further reading

Bass, Clarence B. Backgrounds to Dispensationalism (Baker Books, 1960). ISBN 0801005353.
Blaising, Craig A., and Darrell L. Bock. Dispensationalism, Israel and the Church: The Search for Definition (Zondervan, 1992). ISBN 0310346118.
Blaising, Craig A., and Darrell L. Bock. Progressive Dispensationalism (BridgePoint, 1993). ISBN 156476138X.
Boyer, Paul. When Time Shall Be No More: Prophecy Belief in Modern American Culture (Harvard University Press, 1992). ISBN 0674951298.
Crutchfield, Larry. Origins of Dispensationalism: The Darby Factor (Rowman & Littlefield, 1991). ISBN 0819184675.
DeWitt, Dale Sumner. Dispensational Theology in America During the Twentieth Century: Theological Development and Cultural Context (Grace Bible College,

ISBN 0912340118.
Feinberg, John S. Continuity and Discontinuity: Perspectives on the Relationship Between the Old and New Testaments; Essays in Honor of S. Lewis Johnson, Jr. (Crossway Books, 1988). ISBN 0891074686.
Mangum, R. Todd, and Lanier Burns. The Dispensational-Covenantal Rift: The Fissuring of American Evangelical Theology from 1936 to 1944 (Paternoster,

ISBN 1842273655.
Ryrie, Charles C. Dispensationalism (Moody, 1965; 1995) ISBN 080242256X, ISBN 0802421873.
Saucy, Robert. The Case for Progressive Dispensationalism (Zondervan, 1993). ISBN 0310304415.
See also

Hyper-dispensationalism
Covenant theology
New Covenant theology
Plymouth Brethren
Charles C. Ryrie
C. I. Scofield
John Nelson Darby
External links

Dispensationalism, by Gordon H. Clark
Dispensationalism (from Monergism.com)
Modern Dispensationalism, by Oswald T. Allis
Dispensationalism - A Reformed Evaluation, by Ligon Duncan
Dispensations by Gary Kukis
The History of Dispensationalism, by Kevin Hartley
Is Dispensationalism Biblical?, by Nathan Pitchford
What is Dispensationalism?, by Michael J. Vlac
Online books
Understanding Dispensationalists, by Vern Poythress
Things That Differ: The Fundamentals of Dispensationalism, by Cornelius R. Stam
Bible Truth, by Charles F. Baker
Salvation
Sin
Justice of God
Grace
Kingdom of God
Prevenient grace
Regeneration
Reconciliation
Faith
Justification
Union with Christ
Adoption
Sanctification
Assurance of salvation
Lordship salvation
Non-lordship salvation
Means of grace
Covenant theology
Dispensationalism

The Ugly Truth
06-19-2018, 03:14 PM
Dispensationalism

Dispensationalism is a theological system that teaches biblical history is best understood in light of a number of successive administrations of God's dealings with mankind, which it calls "dispensations."

It maintains fundamental distinctions between God's plans for national Israel and for the New Testament Church, and emphasizes prophecy of the end-times and a pre-tribulation rapture of the church prior to Christ's Second Coming. Its beginnings are usually associated with the Plymouth Brethren movement in the UK and the teachings of John Nelson Darby.

History

The Plymouth Brethren movement, basically a reaction against the established church in England and its ecclesiology, became known for its anti-denominational, anti-clerical, and anti-credal stance. While theologically orthodox, the Plymouth Brethren (Darby in particular) developed unique ideas regarding the interpretation of Scripture while emphasizing prophecy and the second coming of Christ.

The theology of this movement became known as "Dispensationalism."

This new teaching spread in America through prophecy conferences such as the Niagara Bible Conferences (1883-1897). James H. Brookes (1830-1898), a pastor in St. Louis and prominent figure in the Niagara Conferences, disseminated dispensationalist ideas through his ministry and publications.

Most importantly, Dwight L. Moody was sympathetic to the broad outlines of dispensationalism and had as his closest lieutenants dispensationalist leaders such as Reuben A. Torrey (1856-1928), James M. Gray (1851-1925), Cyrus I. Scofield (1843-1921), William J. Eerdman (1833-1923), A. C. Dixon (1854-1925), and A. J. Gordon (1836-1895).

These men were activist evangelists who promoted a host of Bible conferences and other missionary and evangelistic efforts.

They also gave the dispensationalist movement institutional permanence by assuming leadership of the new independent Bible institutes such as the Moody Bible Institute (1886), the Bible Institute of Los Angeles (1907), and the Philadelphia College of the Bible (1914).

The network of related institutes that soon sprang up became the nucleus for the spread of American dispensationalism.

continued

https://www.theopedia.com/dispensationalism

As long as one has accepted Christ as their Savior, none of this really matters.

kudzu
06-19-2018, 03:19 PM
As long as one has accepted Christ as their Savior, none of this really matters.

Actually it does matter because it teaches ideas that are not in scripture.

Jack
06-19-2018, 03:23 PM
Holy Fuck.

Maybe we could get MORE Jesus Freaks to debate these 'important' issues here?

The Ugly Truth
06-20-2018, 08:25 AM
Actually it does matter because it teaches ideas that are not in scripture.

It doesn't matter, as long as it does not lead one astray from the Gospel of Christ. That Gospel is pretty simple. Everyone has sinned and is under a sentence of death. The only way to commute this sentence is to accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior. That is the only thing that really matters.

kudzu
06-20-2018, 08:31 AM
It doesn't matter, as long as it does not lead one astray from the Gospel of Christ. That Gospel is pretty simple. Everyone has sinned and is under a sentence of death. The only way to commute this sentence is to accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior. That is the only thing that really matters.

So you are a Christian Zionist anyway?

The Ugly Truth
06-20-2018, 08:52 AM
So you are a Christian Zionist anyway?

It doesn't matter. It has nothing to do with my Salvation.

kudzu
06-20-2018, 09:02 AM
It doesn't matter. It has nothing to do with my Salvation.

Actually it does if you allow politics dictate right and wrong to you.

The Ugly Truth
06-20-2018, 09:06 AM
Actually it does if you allow politics dictate right and wrong to you.

Since you claim to favor right over wrong, wouldn't you agree that a nation has the right to defend itself? If so, why do believe that Israel should not have that right?

domer76
06-20-2018, 09:33 AM
As long as one has accepted Christ as their Savior, none of this really matters.

Who told you that?

domer76
06-20-2018, 09:33 AM
It doesn't matter, as long as it does not lead one astray from the Gospel of Christ. That Gospel is pretty simple. Everyone has sinned and is under a sentence of death. The only way to commute this sentence is to accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior. That is the only thing that really matters.

Who told you that?

Guno צְבִי
06-20-2018, 09:42 AM
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/32/4c/80/324c80f34a4fe71baee3a1223638d58c--atheism-quotes-religion-quotes.jpg

PostmodernProphet
06-20-2018, 09:43 AM
Actually it does matter because it teaches ideas that are not in scripture.

so ignore it like almost everyone else does.....

PostmodernProphet
06-20-2018, 09:44 AM
I don't know why Christians always start these threads cramming their beliefs down everyone's throats......

kudzu
06-20-2018, 01:54 PM
Since you claim to favor right over wrong, wouldn't you agree that a nation has the right to defend itself? If so, why do believe that Israel should not have that right?

Israel isn't defending itself... its just taking more land .. Always has.