Flanders
03-30-2021, 07:10 AM
Chinese Communists are no friend of the American people; nevertheless, Chicoms blacklisting the Academy Awards
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?164874-Democracy-Decks-Oscar&p=4332051#post4332051
is small potatoes compared to Peking unintentionally exposing the United Nations as China’s best friend.
What are UN specialized agencies, and how many are there?
There are 17 Specialized Agencies:
● FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
● ICAO: International Civil Aviation Organization
● IFAD: International Fund for Agricultural Development
● ILO: International Labour Organization
● IMF: International Monetary Fund
● IMO: International Maritime Organization
● ITU: International Telecommunication Union
● UNESCO: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
● UNIDO: United Nations Industrial Development Organization
● UNWTO: World Tourism Organization
● UPU: Universal Postal Union
● WHO: World Health Organization
● WIPO: World Intellectual Property Organization
● WMO: World Meteorological Organization
● World Bank Group
○ IBRD: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
○ IDA: International Development Association
○ IFC: International Finance Corporation
https://ask.un.org/faq/140935
Art Moore does not cite a number of deaths in his piece, nor does he mention the United Nations. That is why I am reminding everyone that the WHO is a United Nations special agency:
According to a draft copy of the WHO report obtained by the Associated Press, the investigators concluded the most likely origin of the coronavirus is a transmission from bats to humans through another animal.
'Whoa!': Lesley Stahl shocked that WHO gave China control of virus probe
By Art Moore
Published March 29, 2021 at 8:05pm
https://www.wnd.com/2021/03/whoa-lesley-stahl-shocked-gave-china-control-virus-probe/
The popular number of coronavirus deaths is currently 545,000 in the U.S. Those deaths were supposedly caused by a biological weapons laboratory in China.
My body count is based on the cause of death listed on real death certificates:
In truth, an accurate nationwide audit would lower COVID-19 deaths to less than 10:
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?157628-The-Dam-Is-Breaking&p=4133067#post4133067
Chicoms can easily win the blame game by disproving the death totals the liars in our government put out daily:
https://www.wnd.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/deborah-birx-blue-green-scarf.jpg
https://www.wnd.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/deborah-birx-blue-green-scarf.jpg
Former President Donald Trump fired back at his onetime coronavirus adviser, Dr. Deborah Birx, after she told CNN that the previous administration could have prevented hundreds of thousands of deaths from the coronavirus and that she had a "very uncomfortable" conversation with Trump.
"Dr. Birx is a proven liar with very little credibility left," Trump said in a statement Monday.
Trump, claiming many of Birx's recommendations were viewed as "pseudo-science," said that even top White House coronavirus adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci "would always talk negatively about her and, in fact, would ask not to be in the same room with her."
Earlier Monday, former Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows said Birx's statements in the CNN interview were "patently false."
"Well, what we heard from the CNN report last night was rhetoric that we never heard in the West Wing from Deborah Birx or Dr. Fauci," Meadows said in an interview with onetime Trump chief strategist Steve Bannon.
Meadow said he hopes that for her sake, CNN edited some of her remarks, taking them out of context.
"For Dr. Birx to say that hundreds of thousands of people’s lives would have been saved if we had done things differently, is patently false and not accurate and was never uttered in the White House," he said on Bannon's "War Room" show.
In her CNN interview, Birx said the quickly changing circumstances of the early days of the virus made the first 100,000 deaths in the U.S. difficult to prevent.
But she insisted that had the Trump administration acted more decisively, the subsequent deaths "could have been mitigated or decreased substantially."
The official count in the U.S. is more than 545,000 deaths.
Birx said the "very uncomfortable" conversation came after she conducted a TV interview last year in which she described the situation as dire.
"I think you've heard other conversations other people have posted with the president. I would say it was even more direct than what people have heard," Birx said. "It was very uncomfortable, very direct, very difficult to hear."
'She is not salvaging her reputation'
If Birx was trying to rehabilitate her reputation with the Washington political and media establishment, she can't be pleased with the reaction to the CNN interview.
Among the critics were veteran network political analyst Jeff Greenfield, who has worked for ABC, CBS, CNN and PBS.
"The idea that Dr. Birx knew the White House was sending out false information on COVID, and that Trump was intimidating her, makes her performance last year particularly contemptible," he wrote on Twitter.
"She is not salvaging her reputation in latest interviews, she is burying it."
'I seldom followed her advice'
In his statement Monday, Trump also criticized Fauci, who appeared in the CNN feature.
"Based on their interviews, I felt it was time to speak up about Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx, two self-promoters trying to reinvent history to cover for their bad instincts and faulty recommendations, which I fortunately almost always overturned," Trump said. "They had bad policy decisions that would have left our country open to China and others, closed to reopening our economy, and years away from an approved vaccine—putting millions of lives at risk."
Trump said the states that followed Birx's advice, such as California, "had worse outcomes on Covid, and ruined the lives of countless children because they couldn’t go to school, ruined many businesses, and an untold number of Americans who were killed by the lockdowns themselves."
"Dr. Birx was a terrible medical advisor, which is why I seldom followed her advice."
However, it was Birx and Fauci who persuadedTrump to implement the "15 days to slow the spread" guidelines that launched the lockdowns.
Birx and Fauci came to Trump with a model published by Neil Ferguson of Imperial College of London forecasting 2.2 million American deaths from COVID-19.
Trump rips Dr. Birx as 'proven liar' after CNN interview
By Art Moore
Published March 29, 2021 at 8:35pm
https://www.wnd.com/2021/03/trump-rips-dr-birx-proven-liar-cnn-interview/
QUESTION: Why in hell did Trump refuse to fire the two biggest lairs justifying the coronavirus scam with scare tactic numbers? ANSWER: Trump did not want to call attention to the U.N.’s involvement in the Bat Shit Soup Affair. In short: It is not easy to accuse China of biological warfare without accusing the United Nations, too.
NOTE: Chicoms killed at least a hundred million citizens who were suspected of being a threat to Communism’s ideology.
I find it hard to believe that Chicoms unleashed a virus that could kill them when the wind changes.
NOTE: Every ruling class, including Americans, fear dying in a nuclear war. Their fears began in WWI with mustard gas and bombs dropped from newly-invented aircraft. The League of Nations [RENAMED UNITED NATION] was the first attempt to allay their fears. Nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons are the offspring of mustard gas and aerial bombing. Try to imagine their fears today using this as your guide: Ruling classes never cared who, or how many, they sent out to die in wars prior to WWI —— so long as it was not them.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?112190-Nuclear-Proliferation-Guaranties-Retaliation&p=2864182#post2864182
Consider these observations.
Assuming Chicoms had enough antidotes on hand to immunize a billion or so Chinese before China’s military unleashed COVID-19 on the world challenges credulity.
In any event, China attacking the U.S. with a virus is no safer than attacking with nuclear bombs. Basically, no military will ever attack another nation whose retaliatory capabilities are far superior to its own.
Finally, my motive for offering China a way out is obvious.
Irrespective of the tremendous public relations benefit China will get from debunking the lies our liars tell, any government —— friend or foe —— that provides ammunition to use against the United Nations is a small price to pay.
Bottom line: Taking the U.S. out of the U.N. trumps every other foreign policy consideration.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?164874-Democracy-Decks-Oscar&p=4332051#post4332051
is small potatoes compared to Peking unintentionally exposing the United Nations as China’s best friend.
What are UN specialized agencies, and how many are there?
There are 17 Specialized Agencies:
● FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
● ICAO: International Civil Aviation Organization
● IFAD: International Fund for Agricultural Development
● ILO: International Labour Organization
● IMF: International Monetary Fund
● IMO: International Maritime Organization
● ITU: International Telecommunication Union
● UNESCO: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
● UNIDO: United Nations Industrial Development Organization
● UNWTO: World Tourism Organization
● UPU: Universal Postal Union
● WHO: World Health Organization
● WIPO: World Intellectual Property Organization
● WMO: World Meteorological Organization
● World Bank Group
○ IBRD: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
○ IDA: International Development Association
○ IFC: International Finance Corporation
https://ask.un.org/faq/140935
Art Moore does not cite a number of deaths in his piece, nor does he mention the United Nations. That is why I am reminding everyone that the WHO is a United Nations special agency:
According to a draft copy of the WHO report obtained by the Associated Press, the investigators concluded the most likely origin of the coronavirus is a transmission from bats to humans through another animal.
'Whoa!': Lesley Stahl shocked that WHO gave China control of virus probe
By Art Moore
Published March 29, 2021 at 8:05pm
https://www.wnd.com/2021/03/whoa-lesley-stahl-shocked-gave-china-control-virus-probe/
The popular number of coronavirus deaths is currently 545,000 in the U.S. Those deaths were supposedly caused by a biological weapons laboratory in China.
My body count is based on the cause of death listed on real death certificates:
In truth, an accurate nationwide audit would lower COVID-19 deaths to less than 10:
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?157628-The-Dam-Is-Breaking&p=4133067#post4133067
Chicoms can easily win the blame game by disproving the death totals the liars in our government put out daily:
https://www.wnd.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/deborah-birx-blue-green-scarf.jpg
https://www.wnd.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/deborah-birx-blue-green-scarf.jpg
Former President Donald Trump fired back at his onetime coronavirus adviser, Dr. Deborah Birx, after she told CNN that the previous administration could have prevented hundreds of thousands of deaths from the coronavirus and that she had a "very uncomfortable" conversation with Trump.
"Dr. Birx is a proven liar with very little credibility left," Trump said in a statement Monday.
Trump, claiming many of Birx's recommendations were viewed as "pseudo-science," said that even top White House coronavirus adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci "would always talk negatively about her and, in fact, would ask not to be in the same room with her."
Earlier Monday, former Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows said Birx's statements in the CNN interview were "patently false."
"Well, what we heard from the CNN report last night was rhetoric that we never heard in the West Wing from Deborah Birx or Dr. Fauci," Meadows said in an interview with onetime Trump chief strategist Steve Bannon.
Meadow said he hopes that for her sake, CNN edited some of her remarks, taking them out of context.
"For Dr. Birx to say that hundreds of thousands of people’s lives would have been saved if we had done things differently, is patently false and not accurate and was never uttered in the White House," he said on Bannon's "War Room" show.
In her CNN interview, Birx said the quickly changing circumstances of the early days of the virus made the first 100,000 deaths in the U.S. difficult to prevent.
But she insisted that had the Trump administration acted more decisively, the subsequent deaths "could have been mitigated or decreased substantially."
The official count in the U.S. is more than 545,000 deaths.
Birx said the "very uncomfortable" conversation came after she conducted a TV interview last year in which she described the situation as dire.
"I think you've heard other conversations other people have posted with the president. I would say it was even more direct than what people have heard," Birx said. "It was very uncomfortable, very direct, very difficult to hear."
'She is not salvaging her reputation'
If Birx was trying to rehabilitate her reputation with the Washington political and media establishment, she can't be pleased with the reaction to the CNN interview.
Among the critics were veteran network political analyst Jeff Greenfield, who has worked for ABC, CBS, CNN and PBS.
"The idea that Dr. Birx knew the White House was sending out false information on COVID, and that Trump was intimidating her, makes her performance last year particularly contemptible," he wrote on Twitter.
"She is not salvaging her reputation in latest interviews, she is burying it."
'I seldom followed her advice'
In his statement Monday, Trump also criticized Fauci, who appeared in the CNN feature.
"Based on their interviews, I felt it was time to speak up about Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx, two self-promoters trying to reinvent history to cover for their bad instincts and faulty recommendations, which I fortunately almost always overturned," Trump said. "They had bad policy decisions that would have left our country open to China and others, closed to reopening our economy, and years away from an approved vaccine—putting millions of lives at risk."
Trump said the states that followed Birx's advice, such as California, "had worse outcomes on Covid, and ruined the lives of countless children because they couldn’t go to school, ruined many businesses, and an untold number of Americans who were killed by the lockdowns themselves."
"Dr. Birx was a terrible medical advisor, which is why I seldom followed her advice."
However, it was Birx and Fauci who persuadedTrump to implement the "15 days to slow the spread" guidelines that launched the lockdowns.
Birx and Fauci came to Trump with a model published by Neil Ferguson of Imperial College of London forecasting 2.2 million American deaths from COVID-19.
Trump rips Dr. Birx as 'proven liar' after CNN interview
By Art Moore
Published March 29, 2021 at 8:35pm
https://www.wnd.com/2021/03/trump-rips-dr-birx-proven-liar-cnn-interview/
QUESTION: Why in hell did Trump refuse to fire the two biggest lairs justifying the coronavirus scam with scare tactic numbers? ANSWER: Trump did not want to call attention to the U.N.’s involvement in the Bat Shit Soup Affair. In short: It is not easy to accuse China of biological warfare without accusing the United Nations, too.
NOTE: Chicoms killed at least a hundred million citizens who were suspected of being a threat to Communism’s ideology.
I find it hard to believe that Chicoms unleashed a virus that could kill them when the wind changes.
NOTE: Every ruling class, including Americans, fear dying in a nuclear war. Their fears began in WWI with mustard gas and bombs dropped from newly-invented aircraft. The League of Nations [RENAMED UNITED NATION] was the first attempt to allay their fears. Nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons are the offspring of mustard gas and aerial bombing. Try to imagine their fears today using this as your guide: Ruling classes never cared who, or how many, they sent out to die in wars prior to WWI —— so long as it was not them.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?112190-Nuclear-Proliferation-Guaranties-Retaliation&p=2864182#post2864182
Consider these observations.
Assuming Chicoms had enough antidotes on hand to immunize a billion or so Chinese before China’s military unleashed COVID-19 on the world challenges credulity.
In any event, China attacking the U.S. with a virus is no safer than attacking with nuclear bombs. Basically, no military will ever attack another nation whose retaliatory capabilities are far superior to its own.
Finally, my motive for offering China a way out is obvious.
Irrespective of the tremendous public relations benefit China will get from debunking the lies our liars tell, any government —— friend or foe —— that provides ammunition to use against the United Nations is a small price to pay.
Bottom line: Taking the U.S. out of the U.N. trumps every other foreign policy consideration.