PDA

View Full Version : How masturbation and porn can now be regulated on a national level



MarcusA
07-14-2020, 09:59 AM
Ironically, modern technology may make this a good and workable possibility:

1. Children have a microchip installed into their genitals upon birth, which also serves as a contraceptive device.

2. Upon masturbating or arousal, a mild electric shock is generated which causes the genitals to go numb and prevents masturbation; their location is also electronically sent to authorities for monitoring.

3. Individuals who wish to procreate can visit a clinic and have the device de-activated for a period of time, and reactivated later.

---

This would allow us to potentially stop masturbation and promiscuous sexual liasons on a national level, and would likely run the pornography industry out of business in the process without need for legislation (since people who cannot masturbate likely would have no need for pornography); I see this as a win-win!

Hermes Thoth
07-14-2020, 10:06 AM
Ironically, modern technology may make this a good and workable possibility:

1. Children have a microchip installed into their genitals upon birth, which also serves as a contraceptive device.

2. Upon masturbating or arousal, a mild electric shock is generated which causes the genitals to go numb and prevents masturbation; their location is also electronically sent to authorities for monitoring.

3. Individuals who wish to procreate can visit a clinic and have the device de-activated for a period of time, and reactivated later.

---

This would allow us to potentially stop masturbation and promiscuous sexual liasons on a national level, and would likely run the pornography industry out of business in the process without need for legislation (since people who cannot masturbate likely would have no need for pornography); I see this as a win-win!

but what area you gonna do about all this reefer madness?

T. A. Gardner
07-14-2020, 09:16 PM
My god! I have a position of almost never, ever putting anyone on ignore, but I am so tempted to make an exception in the case of MarcusA...

AProudLefty
07-14-2020, 09:18 PM
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/728/070/47b.jpg

anonymoose
07-14-2020, 09:26 PM
Ironically, modern technology may make this a good and workable possibility:

1. Children have a microchip installed into their genitals upon birth, which also serves as a contraceptive device.

2. Upon masturbating or arousal, a mild electric shock is generated which causes the genitals to go numb and prevents masturbation; their location is also electronically sent to authorities for monitoring.

3. Individuals who wish to procreate can visit a clinic and have the device de-activated for a period of time, and reactivated later.

---

This would allow us to potentially stop masturbation and promiscuous sexual liasons on a national level, and would likely run the pornography industry out of business in the process without need for legislation (since people who cannot masturbate likely would have no need for pornography); I see this as a win-win!
This is why i still come here. :laugh:

Bill
07-14-2020, 10:55 PM
Legion has out done himself, again.:laugh:

No need for legislation............lol

They need a good jack tax..... Charge them by the stroke....16173 China prob already has the tech to do it & they can watch cash being deducted right on their phones........

& then make them watch Another bloody night in Paris, starring rose O'donald & donald trump or double the fine...:laugh:

Cancel 2020.2
07-14-2020, 11:05 PM
Ironically, modern technology may make this a good and workable possibility:

1. Children have a microchip installed into their genitals upon birth, which also serves as a contraceptive device.

2. Upon masturbating or arousal, a mild electric shock is generated which causes the genitals to go numb and prevents masturbation; their location is also electronically sent to authorities for monitoring.

3. Individuals who wish to procreate can visit a clinic and have the device de-activated for a period of time, and reactivated later.

---

This would allow us to potentially stop masturbation and promiscuous sexual liasons on a national level, and would likely run the pornography industry out of business in the process without need for legislation (since people who cannot masturbate likely would have no need for pornography); I see this as a win-win!

This is AWFUL. It has Big Brother written all over it.:|

StoneByStone
07-14-2020, 11:05 PM
Ironically, modern technology may make this a good and workable possibility:

1. Children have a microchip installed into their genitals upon birth, which also serves as a contraceptive device.

2. Upon masturbating or arousal, a mild electric shock is generated which causes the genitals to go numb and prevents masturbation; their location is also electronically sent to authorities for monitoring.

3. Individuals who wish to procreate can visit a clinic and have the device de-activated for a period of time, and reactivated later.

---

This would allow us to potentially stop masturbation and promiscuous sexual liasons on a national level, and would likely run the pornography industry out of business in the process without need for legislation (since people who cannot masturbate likely would have no need for pornography); I see this as a win-win!

https://i.giphy.com/media/aZ3LDBs1ExsE8/giphy.webp

Cancel 2020.2
07-14-2020, 11:07 PM
Ironically, modern technology may make this a good and workable possibility:

1. Children have a microchip installed into their genitals upon birth, which also serves as a contraceptive device.

2. Upon masturbating or arousal, a mild electric shock is generated which causes the genitals to go numb and prevents masturbation; their location is also electronically sent to authorities for monitoring.

3. Individuals who wish to procreate can visit a clinic and have the device de-activated for a period of time, and reactivated later.

---

This would allow us to potentially stop masturbation and promiscuous sexual liasons on a national level, and would likely run the pornography industry out of business in the process without need for legislation (since people who cannot masturbate likely would have no need for pornography); I see this as a win-win!

You're not just "jerking" us around are ya? ;)

AProudLefty
07-14-2020, 11:07 PM
This is AWFUL. It has Big Brother written all over it.:|

At least Thread Dumpster isn't as bad as him. Now you see how I view some people here.

AProudLefty
07-14-2020, 11:07 PM
You're not just "jerking" us around are ya? ;)

:laugh:

Cancel 2020.2
07-14-2020, 11:07 PM
At least Thread Dumpster isn't as bad as him. Now you see how I view some people here.

Yep.

StoneByStone
07-14-2020, 11:08 PM
This is AWFUL. It has Big Brother written all over it.:|

I especially like how he admits that banning porn would be too much legislation, but implanting a microchip in our genitals for monitoring and electric shocks is ok.

AProudLefty
07-14-2020, 11:08 PM
You're not just "jerking" us around are ya? ;)

Did you know that if you type : legion :, you get this?

:legion:

Cancel 2020.2
07-14-2020, 11:10 PM
I especially like how he admits that banning porn would be too much legislation, but implanting a microchip in our genitals for monitoring and electric shocks is ok.

I believe he's just f*cking with us.;)

AProudLefty
07-14-2020, 11:11 PM
I believe he's just f*cking with us.;)

Yes he is. He admitted it like a couple of threads ago.

StoneByStone
07-14-2020, 11:12 PM
I believe he's just f*cking with us.;)

If so, he's doing a very good job satirizing the Alt-Right. This is some legit Poe's Law.

Cancel 2020.2
07-14-2020, 11:19 PM
Yes he is. He admitted it like a couple of threads ago.

Yeah, that's right! He's a loon.;)

Cancel 2020.2
07-14-2020, 11:20 PM
If so, he's doing a very good job satirizing the Alt-Right. This is some legit Poe's Law.

I believe he's satirizing BOTH sides, Stoney.

AProudLefty
07-14-2020, 11:23 PM
I believe he's satirizing BOTH sides, Stoney.

He's not doing a very good job at it. :laugh: At least it's funny.

StoneByStone
07-14-2020, 11:24 PM
I believe he's satirizing BOTH sides, Stoney.

I don't know any left-wing movement that wants to stop masturbation. I know at one point Feminists wanted to ban porn, but I think they've moved on from that.

AProudLefty
07-14-2020, 11:31 PM
I don't know any left-wing movement that wants to stop masturbation. I know at one point Feminists wanted to ban porn, but I think they've moved on from that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-pornography_movement_in_the_United_States

This might be funny, but it was actually kinda a thing back then. They had their hands tied at night.

https://s3.scoopwhoop.com/anj/porn_ban/816240801.jpg

Cancel 2020.2
07-14-2020, 11:32 PM
I don't know any left-wing movement that wants to stop masturbation. I know at one point Feminists wanted to ban porn, but I think they've moved on from that.

He satirizes both sides generally speaking. Probably not so much of the Left on THIS thread, but on his other threads he seems to have satirized both sides in equal amounts.

Cancel 2020.2
07-14-2020, 11:33 PM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-pornography_movement_in_the_United_States

This might be funny, but it was actually kinda a thing back then. They had their hands tied at night.

https://s3.scoopwhoop.com/anj/porn_ban/816240801.jpg

This isn't funny, it's sick!:|

AProudLefty
07-14-2020, 11:35 PM
This isn't funny, it's sick!:|

I agree. There were (probably still) movements on this. Those Fundamentalist Christians sure are funny.

T. A. Gardner
07-14-2020, 11:39 PM
This is stupid right up there with that old joke about the guy that tells you he's been working on a tuna boat as an apprentice baiter on the fishing lines for several years and just got promoted to master baiter of the ship....

StoneByStone
07-14-2020, 11:42 PM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-pornography_movement_in_the_United_States

This might be funny, but it was actually kinda a thing back then. They had their hands tied at night.

https://s3.scoopwhoop.com/anj/porn_ban/816240801.jpg

That website is, thankfully, a satire. But there was a lot of wacky panic about masturbation in the eighties. Ever hear about how Cornflakes were created to stop people from jacking it? Turns out that's true.

AProudLefty
07-14-2020, 11:45 PM
That website is, thankfully, a satire. But there was a lot of wacky panic about masturbation in the eighties. Ever hear about how Cornflakes were created to stop people from jacking it? Turns out that's true.

Do you have hair on your palm?

Cancel 2020.2
07-14-2020, 11:47 PM
This is stupid right up there with that old joke about the guy that tells you he's been working on a tuna boat as an apprentice baiter on the fishing lines for several years and just got promoted to master baiter of the ship....

Yep! Kind of like what younger people would've called Norman in the book and movie Psycho - Mr. or Mister Bates OR one greatly serving Norman would've addressed him as Master Bates.

Cancel 2020.2
07-14-2020, 11:48 PM
Yep! Kind of like what younger people would've called Norman in the book and movie Psycho - Mr. or Mister Bates OR one greatly serving Norman would've addressed him as Master Bates.
And don't get me started on actress Kathy Bates............................;)

AProudLefty
07-14-2020, 11:49 PM
And don't get me started on actress Kathy Bates............................;)

Good actress. Misery was very scary.

Cancel 2020.2
07-14-2020, 11:56 PM
Good actress. Misery was very scary.

Yep, it WAS frightening. It's SO cool that Bates won the Best Actress Oscar for that movie.:cool:

StoneByStone
07-15-2020, 12:08 AM
Do you have hair on your palm?

So much that I'm able to braid it.

AProudLefty
07-15-2020, 12:08 AM
So much that I'm able to braid it.

:laugh:

Hermes Thoth
07-15-2020, 10:35 AM
If so, he's doing a very good job satirizing the Alt-Right. This is some legit Poe's Law.

wrong.

Poor Richard Saunders
07-15-2020, 11:05 AM
This is AWFUL. It has Big Brother written all over it.:|

I'm pretty sure the chip has "Sony ANTI-playstation" written on it.

StoneByStone
07-15-2020, 11:19 AM
wrong.

Bend over.

Hermes Thoth
07-15-2020, 11:24 AM
Bend over.


like he said, marcusa is closest to a purple haired lesbian.

he closest to a lefty. if you notice it was trump supporters arguing with him most.

Cancel 2020.2
07-15-2020, 11:33 AM
I'm pretty sure the chip has "Sony ANTI-playstation" written on it.

Good one, Dicky!;)

Geeko Sportivo
07-15-2020, 11:34 AM
Legion has out done himself, again.:laugh:

No need for legislation............lol

They need a good jack tax..... Charge them by the stroke....16173 China prob already has the tech to do it & they can watch cash being deducted right on their phones........

& then make them watch Another bloody night in Paris, starring rose O'donald & donald trump or double the fine...:laugh:

It's pretty obvious huh?

Of, course, I haven't ruled out Arminius or PostProphet either.

Could be all the same Troll!

Cancel 2020.2
07-15-2020, 11:34 AM
Bend over.

:whoa: :whoa:

StoneByStone
07-15-2020, 11:35 AM
like he said, marcusa is closest to a purple haired lesbian.

he closest to a lefty. if you notice it was trump supporters arguing with him most.

I've never seen a Lefty who wanted to ban porn, but I've seen countless Alt-Righters and other Incels who want to do so. Even the far-right version of YouTube, Gab, has banned porn despite being founded as a "free speech" platform for Fascists.
It's actually pretty fitting. Fascists talk endlessly about how these imaginary Liberals are taking away their free speech. But the moment Fascists get the power to eliminate free speech, they will.

Cancel 2020.2
07-15-2020, 11:35 AM
So much that I'm able to braid it.

Wow! Are you a werewolf, by any chance, Stoney?;)

Cancel 2020.2
07-15-2020, 11:37 AM
I've never seen a Lefty who wanted to ban porn, but I've seen countless Alt-Righters and other Incels who want to do so. Even the far-right version of YouTube, Gab, has banned porn despite being founded as a "free speech" platform for Fascists.
It's actually pretty fitting. Fascists talk endlessly about how these imaginary Liberals are taking away their free speech. But the moment Fascists get the power to eliminate free speech, they will.

:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

StoneByStone
07-15-2020, 11:37 AM
Wow! Are you a werewolf, by any chance, Stoney?;)

Only during the full moon.

Hermes Thoth
07-15-2020, 11:39 AM
I've never seen a Lefty who wanted to ban porn, but I've seen countless Alt-Righters and other Incels who want to do so. Even the far-right version of YouTube, Gab, has banned porn despite being founded as a "free speech" platform for Fascists.
It's actually pretty fitting. Fascists talk endlessly about how these imaginary Liberals are taking away their free speech. But the moment Fascists get the power to eliminate free speech, they will.

you're not paying attention then. there are many anti porners on the left.

and incels love porn.

Cancel 2020.2
07-15-2020, 11:39 AM
Only during the full moon.

Stay safe out there, Stoney, and DO watch out for those silver bullets!;)

Cancel 2020.2
07-15-2020, 11:40 AM
Stay safe out there, Stoney, and DO watch out for those silver bullets!;)

And I'm NOT talking about Coors Light Beer.............................................. ..;)

Cancel 2020.2
07-15-2020, 11:46 AM
On one hand, I believe one should be able to masturbate as much as they please, in the safety of their own home.............

Cancel 2020.2
07-15-2020, 11:46 AM
On one hand, I believe one should be able to masturbate as much as they please, in the safety of their own home.............

On the OTHER hand..............

Cancel 2020.2
07-15-2020, 11:47 AM
On the OTHER hand..............

You DON'T want to know what's IN that hand!;)

T. A. Gardner
07-15-2020, 12:18 PM
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/pFdLGbUnpVnxvNpKGD3lUgBhuW0mb-__YnPKYH-fZGRijLPHUJA98Dgf_WsOPfHvj3rIP0DDOh2zkohUygTzXL-HhEk1wwJxCzfjG_R7s0r1hxElijhMVRu0Gg=w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu

Cancel 2020.2
07-15-2020, 12:20 PM
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/pFdLGbUnpVnxvNpKGD3lUgBhuW0mb-__YnPKYH-fZGRijLPHUJA98Dgf_WsOPfHvj3rIP0DDOh2zkohUygTzXL-HhEk1wwJxCzfjG_R7s0r1hxElijhMVRu0Gg=w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu

Ha-ha! If this WERE true, I would've gone COMPLETELY blind at ages 13-14. My hand WAS my best friend.;)

Jack
07-15-2020, 12:22 PM
Ironically, modern technology may make this a good and workable possibility:

1. Children have a microchip installed into their genitals upon birth, which also serves as a contraceptive device.

2. Upon masturbating or arousal, a mild electric shock is generated which causes the genitals to go numb and prevents masturbation; their location is also electronically sent to authorities for monitoring.

3. Individuals who wish to procreate can visit a clinic and have the device de-activated for a period of time, and reactivated later.

---

This would allow us to potentially stop masturbation and promiscuous sexual liasons on a national level, and would likely run the pornography industry out of business in the process without need for legislation (since people who cannot masturbate likely would have no need for pornography); I see this as a win-win!

Are you a sock puppet of Doris? This sounds like something she would post.

MarcusA
07-15-2020, 06:09 PM
Are you a sock puppet of Doris? This sounds like something she would post.
No idea who that is, but point remains:

1. Porn is a form of sexual SOCIALISM and AFFIRMATIVE ACTION which encourages weak and undesirable men (and some women) to be UNPRODUCTIVE.

2. In ancient, traditional cultures - porn was not as easy to access as it is now; so if a man wanted the company of an 'attractive' woman, he had to prove himself EVOLUTIONARILY FIT to the tribe; if he couldn't then he would be forced to prove himself fit, or if unable to do that, made into a slave or eunuch (which 99% of those INCEL SCUM would have been if we were governed by ancient, traditional notions of evolutionary fitness and meritocracy).

---

So NO, porn is a threat to men (and women) of the more attractive and desirable variety; it encourages emotionally-stunded man-babies (and some women) to simply wallow and subsist in their addiction at the expense of societal fitness; fitter men and women obviously have less of an "overwhelming need" for sex or porn, since by virtue of their superiority, physically, intellectually or otherwise, they can afford to be more "choosy", like a wealthy person who takes his time to find the best cuisine to suit his palate, as opposed to a starving, undesirable, and desperate "man" who would eat rotten meat out of a dumpster because he is so desperate.

Tell me what social benefit at all porn for FITTER MEN AND WOMEN who don't need it - it has no benefit for them, and only benefits WASTRELS and other anti-intellectual, idish idiots who arrested in development and believe that purile instant gratification is the only reason de'tre for existence, just like any feral dog or cat awaiting euthanasia.

There is NO REASON that Hitler, Mussolini or any other nationalist would have allowed porn addiction for the weakest members of society; if anything he would have been considering putting them in DEATH CAMPS, not satiating their degnerate desires and addictions.

MarcusA
07-15-2020, 06:13 PM
you're not paying attention then. there are many anti porners on the left.

and incels love porn.
Right, they love pleasing and simping themselves out to their mom, their female bosses, etc to subsidize their internet porn addictions, and wasting all of their time competing for access to the vaginas of their Waifus and female World of Warcraft characters.

As opposed to comparatively normal people who do the same thing, the only difference is that superior people get actual sex out of it; while "incels" are lucky if they get to see the vagina on a badly drawn anime character.

So both are using the same "strategy", of the two, it's apparent the Incels are simply less evolutionarily acceptable and adapt to it, lmao

MarcusA
07-15-2020, 06:18 PM
like he said, marcusa is closest to a purple haired lesbian.

Purple-haired lesbians are right; even a "broken clock" can be right twice a week.

The fact that even people as 'diverse' as nationalists and purple-haired lesbians can come together on the fact that incels are nothing worthless, rapist, pedophile subhumans whose "disease" can only be 'cured' with a bullet or a gas chamber, should be a wake-up call; the majority of incels probably moonlight as card-carrying NAMBLA members based on what I've heard of their freaky and pestilence.



he closest to a lefty. if you notice it was trump supporters arguing with him most.
Trump is a center-left candidate on the political spectrum at best, and not a true conservative or nationalist; never the less he's a potentially useful idiot would could potentially help decimate the degenerate and bestial left, and pave the way for true national conservatism.

MarcusA
07-15-2020, 06:35 PM
I've never seen a Lefty who wanted to ban porn, but I've seen countless Alt-Righters and other Incels who want to do so.

You are WRONG AGAIN.

An INCEL is a degenerate freak to whom the ONLY purpose of existence is porn and masturbation; many of them likely moonlight as NAMBLA members and wish they could rape and molest children as well.

They are the LOWEST FORM OF LIFE KNOWN TO MAN, on par with viruses and bacteria and shouldn't be allowed to EXIST anymore than CORNAVIRUS; Hitler's polices would have been entirely just and admirable had SCUM like incels been the ones in the death camps.

---

Being AGAINST porn is merely something that anyone with a remotely normal sex drive who isn't incredibly undeniable would be, to some extinct.

It's not a "left/right issue", so much as an "ugly, desperate, and stupid people who can't afford to be choosy when it comes to sex or find any more intellectually stimulating desire" versus healthy, fit, and desirable people who can be choosers, and who are motivated by higher-intellectual pursuits, not solely banal and physical ones.

---

Much as the concept of VOLUNTARY celebacy is the polar opposite, the notion of "voluntary celebacy" has always been an intellectual one, or one for improving the intellect and fitness of the race and tribe; much as intelligent and thinking people are already "more celebate" than less intelligent and thinking ones; since intelligent men and women have fewer children and spend less time on purely banal and physical pursuits, than less intelligent and creative ones, who already have 5 babies with 5 different baby mommies/daddies by age 16.

(Example from history - St. Paul was a wealthy, intellectual elite of his day and age - having women, concubines, prostitutes would not have been hard for one of his social status and prestige, however he wished to promote notions of "celebacy" and valuing the higher-intellectual ideals and pursuits over the merely physical, and instant gratifying ones.

One can find both "religious" and "secular" variants of said thing, such as John Stuart Mill's treatise on civilization, and how civilization represents a cultural "evolution" up from barbarism and 3rd world savagry where the physical and primal (e.x. fighting, hunting, polygamy, child marriage) is valued over the intellectual (e.x. institutions of law, courts, virtues, and so forth) - in his own words, better a man disatisfied, than a pig satisfied.



Even the far-right version of YouTube, Gab, has banned porn despite being founded as a "free speech" platform for Fascists.

Good, "frees peach" is trash, and should be outlawed except for nationalist, intellectual elite, not for leftist degenerates, peasants, and mouth-breathing rabble who shouldn't be allowed to vote or participate in politics at at all, let alone having any pretense to "frees peach rights", or rights of any kind other than to a speedy trial and execution for heresy and high treason against God and state.



It's actually pretty fitting. Fascists talk endlessly about how these imaginary Liberals are taking away their free speech. But the moment Fascists get the power to eliminate free speech, they will.
There's no reason nationalists should allow or care about anyone's right to "frees peach" other than their own, as if feral dogs, peasants and mongrels are worthy of the same rights or notions of "humanity" to begin with as enlightened, philosopher kings and queens.

If they can use propaganda about "frees peach" to advance their cause, then good, as long as it works.

StoneByStone
07-15-2020, 07:00 PM
Good, "frees peach" is trash, and should be outlawed except for nationalist, intellectual elite, not for leftist degenerates, peasants, and mouth-breathing rabble who shouldn't be allowed to vote or participate in politics at at all, let alone having any pretense to "frees peach rights", or rights of any kind other than to a speedy trial and execution for heresy and high treason against God and state.

As terrible as your views are, I will give you credit for one thing. You're probably the only Fascist here with the balls to admit that you don't believe in free speech.
If you even really are a Fascist. I think it's also possible that you're just a trolly boi.

Hermes Thoth
07-15-2020, 07:32 PM
Purple-haired lesbians are right; even a "broken clock" can be right twice a week.

The fact that even people as 'diverse' as nationalists and purple-haired lesbians can come together on the fact that incels are nothing worthless, rapist, pedophile subhumans whose "disease" can only be 'cured' with a bullet or a gas chamber, should be a wake-up call; the majority of incels probably moonlight as card-carrying NAMBLA members based on what I've heard of their freaky and pestilence.


Trump is a center-left candidate on the political spectrum at best, and not a true conservative or nationalist; never the less he's a potentially useful idiot would could potentially help decimate the degenerate and bestial left, and pave the way for true national conservatism.

nobody wants your mass murder, senor insane.

MarcusA
07-15-2020, 07:33 PM
As terrible as your views are, I will give you credit for one thing. You're probably the only Fascist here with the balls to admit that you don't believe in free speech.
If you even really are a Fascist. I think it's also possible that you're just a trolly boi.
The bare minimum standards of literacy have dropped enough, to the point that even an idiot with an average 6th grade reading/writing level (who is far from FLUENT in English or any language) can meet the bare min required to vote and participate in politics.

There is no reason that people who read and write at post-graduate levels (like me) should have the same "frees peach" rights as people who are stuck at such a lower level of reading/writing; this is one of the most SOCIALIST things I have ever had the audacity to encounter.

It may have been better back when written language was much rarer except for people who came from well-educated families (e.x. America's framers and most significant political individuals in the history of modern Europe); since this meant that the bare min required to participate was much higher!

Example: THIS is the bare min which can vote in this country today and gets the SAME votes as me or people even smarter than me - what a joke!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqxaP4t9gEc

Hermes Thoth
07-15-2020, 07:35 PM
You are WRONG AGAIN.

An INCEL is a degenerate freak to whom the ONLY purpose of existence is porn and masturbation; many of them likely moonlight as NAMBLA members and wish they could rape and molest children as well.

They are the LOWEST FORM OF LIFE KNOWN TO MAN, on par with viruses and bacteria and shouldn't be allowed to EXIST anymore than CORNAVIRUS; Hitler's polices would have been entirely just and admirable had SCUM like incels been the ones in the death camps.

---

Being AGAINST porn is merely something that anyone with a remotely normal sex drive who isn't incredibly undeniable would be, to some extinct.

It's not a "left/right issue", so much as an "ugly, desperate, and stupid people who can't afford to be choosy when it comes to sex or find any more intellectually stimulating desire" versus healthy, fit, and desirable people who can be choosers, and who are motivated by higher-intellectual pursuits, not solely banal and physical ones.

---

Much as the concept of VOLUNTARY celebacy is the polar opposite, the notion of "voluntary celebacy" has always been an intellectual one, or one for improving the intellect and fitness of the race and tribe; much as intelligent and thinking people are already "more celebate" than less intelligent and thinking ones; since intelligent men and women have fewer children and spend less time on purely banal and physical pursuits, than less intelligent and creative ones, who already have 5 babies with 5 different baby mommies/daddies by age 16.

(Example from history - St. Paul was a wealthy, intellectual elite of his day and age - having women, concubines, prostitutes would not have been hard for one of his social status and prestige, however he wished to promote notions of "celebacy" and valuing the higher-intellectual ideals and pursuits over the merely physical, and instant gratifying ones.

One can find both "religious" and "secular" variants of said thing, such as John Stuart Mill's treatise on civilization, and how civilization represents a cultural "evolution" up from barbarism and 3rd world savagry where the physical and primal (e.x. fighting, hunting, polygamy, child marriage) is valued over the intellectual (e.x. institutions of law, courts, virtues, and so forth) - in his own words, better a man disatisfied, than a pig satisfied.


Good, "frees peach" is trash, and should be outlawed except for nationalist, intellectual elite, not for leftist degenerates, peasants, and mouth-breathing rabble who shouldn't be allowed to vote or participate in politics at at all, let alone having any pretense to "frees peach rights", or rights of any kind other than to a speedy trial and execution for heresy and high treason against God and state.


There's no reason nationalists should allow or care about anyone's right to "frees peach" other than their own, as if feral dogs, peasants and mongrels are worthy of the same rights or notions of "humanity" to begin with as enlightened, philosopher kings and queens.

If they can use propaganda about "frees peach" to advance their cause, then good, as long as it works.

you're a moron. but I support your free speech so everybody can see how deranged you are.

MarcusA
07-15-2020, 07:38 PM
nobody wants your mass murder, senor insane.
So what should happen to MONSTERS who want to rape and molest children? (Which is what the INCEL CULT / FREAKSHOW IS, it's just a re-branding of NAMBLA and the individuals known for it on the internet admit to being pedophiles or pro-pedophilia; this can be varied by google)

In PRISONS they would be murdered in brutal fashion; this would just be EVOLUTION taking its natural course! (Even convicted murderers in prison despise monsters who want to rape and molest children).

(I'm not saying YOU are a pedophile, but your promoting something which has documented links to that sick shit whether you KNOW it or NOT!)

MarcusA
07-15-2020, 07:39 PM
you're a moron. but I support your free speech so everybody can see how deranged you are.
Frees peach (aka frozen peach) is dangerous in the hands of subversives who use it to pollute and corrupt the nation!

(Such as the bloody idiots who use it to promote social ills such as pedophilia, degeneracy, deviance, leftist degeneracy, freakery, heresy, and so on!)

StoneByStone
07-15-2020, 07:40 PM
The bare minimum standards of literacy have dropped enough, to the point that even an idiot with an average 6th grade reading/writing level (who is far from FLUENT in English or any language) can meet the bare min required to vote and participate in politics.

There is no reason that people who read and write at post-graduate levels (like me) should have the same "frees peach" rights as people who are stuck at such a lower level of reading/writing; this is one of the most SOCIALIST things I have ever had the audacity to encounter.

It may have been better back when written language was much rarer except for people who came from well-educated families (e.x. America's framers and most significant political individuals in the history of modern Europe); since this meant that the bare min required to participate was much higher!

Example: THIS is the bare min which can vote in this country today and gets the SAME votes as me or people even smarter than me - what a joke!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqxaP4t9gEc

Everyone should have free speech, but only people with an IQ of 100 or higher should be able to vote. I think that's fair. Everyone gets to present their ideas, but only intelligent people decide on which ideas become laws. That also isn't a perfect system, since we'd still have NPC cucks voting, but it would be a much better system than we have now.

MarcusA
07-15-2020, 08:11 PM
Frees peach (aka frozen peach) is dangerous in the hands of subversives who use it to pollute and corrupt the nation!

(Such as the bloody idiots who use it to promote social ills such as pedophilia, degeneracy, deviance, leftist degeneracy, freakery, heresy, and so on!)
Examples of things which should NOT be free speech:

1. Using the the term "white (people" ("white" is a nonsense term invented for US census purposes; it is not recognized by any court of law, and is not a "race" or "culture" but merely descriptive (e.x. like terms such as "old people"; terms such as "black / Hispanic" arguably have different origins)

2. Using the term "heterosexual" (everyone is heterosexual by default, so this term is absurdist, or other nonsense terms such as "cis" which don't even need to be pointed out)

3. Using terms such as "man / woman" in a nonsense context; under the LAW the terms are irrelevant and merely descriptive)

4. Terms such as "gay/straight/transgender/lesbian/LBGT" if they are misrepresented as having some type of "legal" standing or validity; when in reality they have none at all and are not recognized by any court of law (nor other nonsense terms/slang/jargon that I see fools like incels and related ilk using such as "toxic masculinity" as if such nonsense and bullshit terms have any validity or recognition at ALL outside of various invented nonsense on Urban Dictionary which will NEVER have any recognition by anyone that matters and be laughed out of any court of law if someone was stupid enough to attempt to use to begin with.

This is good for starters...

T. A. Gardner
07-15-2020, 08:42 PM
Examples of things which should NOT be free speech:

1. Using the the term "white (people" ("white" is a nonsense term invented for US census purposes; it is not recognized by any court of law, and is not a "race" or "culture" but merely descriptive (e.x. like terms such as "old people"; terms such as "black / Hispanic" arguably have different origins)

Black is as meaningless as White. Caucasian and African maybe... But even those aren't particularly accurate because of racial mixing. As for "Hispanic" that's a language not a race.

Jack
07-16-2020, 07:07 AM
No idea who that is, but point remains:

1. Porn is a form of sexual SOCIALISM and AFFIRMATIVE ACTION which encourages weak and undesirable men (and some women) to be UNPRODUCTIVE.

2. In ancient, traditional cultures - porn was not as easy to access as it is now; so if a man wanted the company of an 'attractive' woman, he had to prove himself EVOLUTIONARILY FIT to the tribe; if he couldn't then he would be forced to prove himself fit, or if unable to do that, made into a slave or eunuch (which 99% of those INCEL SCUM would have been if we were governed by ancient, traditional notions of evolutionary fitness and meritocracy).

---

So NO, porn is a threat to men (and women) of the more attractive and desirable variety; it encourages emotionally-stunded man-babies (and some women) to simply wallow and subsist in their addiction at the expense of societal fitness; fitter men and women obviously have less of an "overwhelming need" for sex or porn, since by virtue of their superiority, physically, intellectually or otherwise, they can afford to be more "choosy", like a wealthy person who takes his time to find the best cuisine to suit his palate, as opposed to a starving, undesirable, and desperate "man" who would eat rotten meat out of a dumpster because he is so desperate.

Tell me what social benefit at all porn for FITTER MEN AND WOMEN who don't need it - it has no benefit for them, and only benefits WASTRELS and other anti-intellectual, idish idiots who arrested in development and believe that purile instant gratification is the only reason de'tre for existence, just like any feral dog or cat awaiting euthanasia.

There is NO REASON that Hitler, Mussolini or any other nationalist would have allowed porn addiction for the weakest members of society; if anything he would have been considering putting them in DEATH CAMPS, not satiating their degnerate desires and addictions.

Dude. You actually have a point. And, I can't argue the point you are making other than to point out 'we are a Market based economy'.
'Porn' is an industry, like the Tobacco Industry or the Gambling Industry, it's all about 'The Money'.
So, even though I may agree with some of your comments, I believe your premise misses the target.

Marcus: "Tell me what social benefit at all porn for FITTER MEN AND WOMEN who don't need it"
Jack: Our society tells us that a Man and Woman, having biological children, is the best way to raise a Family. But, our Desires opt for sexual variety (maybe some primitive way to 'spread the seed'?). So, which is more conducive for a 'faithful' Marriage, the Man or Woman having physical affairs over 40 years, or the Man and Woman having 'virtual' affairs with their favorite Porn Stars as they lay in bed together.

Bill
07-16-2020, 09:57 PM
It's pretty obvious huh?

Of, course, I haven't ruled out Arminius or PostProphet either.

Could be all the same Troll!

I think so.... Between them they don't have enough sense of humor to laugh @ moreless come up w/ this..

To old pale pieces of bread sitting out on the patio waiting for the birds to come along.........

Cancel 2020.2
07-16-2020, 10:07 PM
I think so.... Between them they don't have enough sense of humor to laugh @ moreless come up w/ this..

To old pale pieces of bread sitting out on the patio waiting for the birds to come along.........

:palm:

Saudade
07-16-2020, 10:34 PM
Ironically, modern technology may make this a good and workable possibility:

1. Children have a microchip installed into their genitals upon birth, which also serves as a contraceptive device.

2. Upon masturbating or arousal, a mild electric shock is generated which causes the genitals to go numb and prevents masturbation; their location is also electronically sent to authorities for monitoring.

3. Individuals who wish to procreate can visit a clinic and have the device de-activated for a period of time, and reactivated later.

---

This would allow us to potentially stop masturbation and promiscuous sexual liasons on a national level, and would likely run the pornography industry out of business in the process without need for legislation (since people who cannot masturbate likely would have no need for pornography); I see this as a win-win!

As a side note, male circumcision was historically promoted throughout America as a way to reduce masturbation. It clearly didn't work.

Matt Dillon
07-16-2020, 10:36 PM
https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tenor.co%2Fimages%2Fd2b12b8 50b02c0a236454f20701dc2b4%2Fraw&f=1&nofb=1

Walt
07-17-2020, 09:37 AM
Ironically, modern technology may make this a good and workable possibility:

1. Children have a microchip installed into their genitals upon birth, which also serves as a contraceptive device.

2. Upon masturbating or arousal, a mild electric shock is generated which causes the genitals to go numb and prevents masturbation; their location is also electronically sent to authorities for monitoring.

3. Individuals who wish to procreate can visit a clinic and have the device de-activated for a period of time, and reactivated later.

---

This would allow us to potentially stop masturbation and promiscuous sexual liasons on a national level, and would likely run the pornography industry out of business in the process without need for legislation (since people who cannot masturbate likely would have no need for pornography); I see this as a win-win!

I am not quite sure what Marcus has against sexual arousal. Without any ability to become sexually aroused, there would be no new births.

Beyond that, to provide electricity for an electrical shock, and to power the "microchip", you would need a battery. That would mean the whole deal is much bigger than you expect. You would need to recharge the battery from time to time.

This really seems like a national solution to what is a personal, individual problem of just Marcus'.

Phantasmal
07-17-2020, 09:41 AM
I am not quite sure what Marcus has against sexual arousal. Without any ability to become sexually aroused, there would be no new births.

Beyond that, to provide electricity for an electrical shock, and to power the "microchip", you would need a battery. That would mean the whole deal is much bigger than you expect. You would need to recharge the battery from time to time.

This really seems like a national solution to what is a personal, individual problem of just Marcus'.
I think he needs a lot of help.

Cancel 2020.2
07-17-2020, 09:41 AM
I am not quite sure what Marcus has against sexual arousal. Without any ability to become sexually aroused, there would be no new births.

Beyond that, to provide electricity for an electrical shock, and to power the "microchip", you would need a battery. That would mean the whole deal is much bigger than you expect. You would need to recharge the battery from time to time.

This really seems like a national solution to what is a personal, individual problem of just Marcus'.

Good, point, Walt. I finally agree with you on something.;)

Cancel 2020.2
07-17-2020, 09:42 AM
I think he needs a lot of help.

Yep. It appears the poor bastard needs more help than I do!;)