Goalposts moved!

Superfreak said:
18 U.S. Code § 371 - is about conspiracy, not collusion. So you lied by quoting this.
18 U.S.C. 1512(c)(2) -is about tampering with a witness. Not collusion. So you lied by citing this.
18 USC 2 - again, not about collusion. Again you lied.
18 USC 1030 - is about computer fraud, again not about collusion. you lied yet again.
18 USC 1343 - is about wire fraud, again not about collusion. you lied again.
52 USC 30121 - is about contributions by foreign nationals, again not about collusion. you lied again.
18 USC 2381- is about levying war against the US. Not about collusion. You lied again

See what happens when you cite other peoples comments on this thread without actually knowing what any of the above referenced? you are a liar Garud.
Click to expand...

You are an idiot or disingenuous collusion can be captured in all of those.
 
Jarod said:
You are an idiot or disingenuous collusion can be captured in all of those.
Click to expand...

LMAO... no moron, it cannot. You are simply making shit up. You are free to explain how you think it is 'captured' in the above, but we both know you're a dishonest piece of shit that will refuse to do so.
 
Jarod said:
It’s clear you never passed the bar. In some circumstances it is a crime to collude. In some circumstances it is a crime to kill. In some circumstances it is a crime to obstruct justice.
Click to expand...

Yet you stated:

Jarod said:
Has anyone heard Mueller claim that what he is investigating is "collusion"?
Click to expand...

Jarod said:
Any idiot can see that there is criminal collusion and non-criminal collusion.
Click to expand...

I guess you can't remember what point you are flailing at can you? You define dishonest and liar.
 
Jarod said:
If trump took the meeting, the lie he told about it is Obstruction.
Click to expand...

How in the hell did you pass the bar with such an inane conclusion. Did the meeting break any laws? Trump doesn't have to lie. He could have been there and it wouldn't have changed a damn thing. No LAWS WERE BROKEN you willful idiot.
 
Jarod said:
It’s absurd!

Do you have a cite re your Obama allegations?
Click to expand...

Really? Now you want to bring a discussion about Obama into the thread? Talk about moving goalposts. You continue to prove you're an idiot.

A great example of how ANYONE can pass the bar.
 
Jarod said:
I’ll start with these, your turn.

18 U.S. Code § 371
18 U.S.C. 1512(c)(2)
18 USC 2
18 USC 1030
18 USC 1343
52 USC 30121
18 USC 2381
Click to expand...

What conspiracy? You can cite all the code you want, but they have to be applied to a crime. What crime did Trump or his campaign commit?

It's so obvious that even a legal beagle like Mueller can't find it.
 
CharacterAssassin said:
Collusion itself isn't a crime (unless in corporate anti-trust terms); it's more of a general catchall term that will be cooked down eventually to conspiracy.

That said, in a memorandum issued on August 2nd, Rosenstein spelled out the details of Mueller’s jurisdiction. He said that Mueller had the authority to investigate:

Allegations that Paul Manafort:

Committed a crime or crimes by colluding with Russian government officials with respect to the Russian government’s efforts to interfere with the 2016 election for President of the United States, in violation of United States law;

Committed a crime or crimes arising out of payments he received from the Ukrainian government before and during the tenure of President Viktor Yanukovych.

This really isn't all that hard to understand.

Please try harder to be less stupid.
Click to expand...

It's because you are a moron that you think this has anything to do with Trump's campaign or his successful election.
 
Jarod said:
Are you seriously claiming that collusion cannot be a crime?
Click to expand...

Your comments:
Jarod said:
Has anyone heard Mueller claim that what he is investigating is "collusion"?
Click to expand...
Jarod said:
Any idiot can see that there is criminal collusion and non-criminal collusion.
Click to expand...

I would like to know exactly what the Trump campaign, or Trump himself, have been charged with. Obama was the President and apparently did NOTHING to stop Russian interference. Obama was President and said it was IMPOSSIBLE to rig an election in this country.

So what is it fake lawyer?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
You do realize the election wasn't stolen, nobody tried, and nobody conspired, colluded, or cheated right?
Click to expand...

Is that the level you are at? The Russians spent over a million a month on hacking our elections. They had Russian troll farms that even used the military. They trained hackers and they used WikiLeaks, Facebook and emails to besiege targeted American with anti Hillary propaganda. The election was extremely close. it is easy to surmise that all that Russian effort and cost, with trumps people helping (colluding), made him president.

If you guys had an iota of caring about America and the free elections, you would be furious at Russia for interfering. You would be screaming about what they did and demand we find ways to prevent it from happening again. Instead you look for some loophole that will allow them to help the right again. You guys are protecting Russian hackers.
 
Last edited:
Superfreak said:
LMAO... no moron, it cannot. You are simply making shit up. You are free to explain how you think it is 'captured' in the above, but we both know you're a dishonest piece of shit that will refuse to do so.
Click to expand...

I should not expect a person of you were limited intellect to be able to understand.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top