It's different when DEMOCRATS do it.

This had to be the easiest thread to tear apart of any that I've seen in months , this being the one that has gotten their support from goofy sources , nonsense sources and straight out lie sources.
 
jbander said:
This is how the hate party operates , 95% distortions and lies , show everyone here where I said Obama had a IQ of 140.
Click to expand...

You said quote "You have no clue because most of the presidents IQ scores have been configured by other test they took , mostly lsat's. Obama graduated Magma Com laud from Harvard where the average IQ is 140. Give us one of Bush's papers on any subject and I'll give you multiple award wining writings from Obama." Now you didn't say his IQ was 140 but you strongly hinted it was. Typical leftie ploy say something in such a way as to be able to deny it. If you aren't suggesting it's 140 than why bring up the number at all. May I remind you that your response was in regard to my saying Obama's IQ was around 124.

Sorry you can't lie your way out of this one.
 
jbander said:
I'll your doing is proving my point, that everything you got is based on lies or distortion. "View attachment 7170: Thank you very much for supporting my comment that what you hate party mebers operate on bullshit , nothing real just what someone tell you how to think.
Click to expand...

First off fuck face I was supporting Obama's graduating Magma Cum Laud. But you're to blinded by hatred of conservatives, you ignore it.
 
jbander said:
Since every Magma cum laud award is different from different schools to show how brainless and stupid people are from the right I went directly to Harvard requirement . Magna Cum Laude in a Field

A candidate may be recommended by the Faculty for the degree magna cum laude in a concentration or joint concentration provided the student has been designated by the concentration to receive High Honors or Highest Honors. For May degrees, the total number of degrees summa cum laude and magna cum laude combined will be no more than 20 percent of all May degree candidates. The Faculty will recommend for magna cum laude those students with the highest grade point averages who have not already been recommended for the degree summa cum laude. Candidates in this category who received Highest Honors from their concentration but were not awarded summa cum laude will be recommended for the degree magna cum laude with Highest Honors in a Field. The minimum grade point average that is awarded a degree magna cum laude each May will constitute the standard to be applied for that degree at subsequent degree meetings until the following May. "

THE RIGHT WING CAN NOT OPERATE WITHOUT THE SUPPORT OF PEOPLE WHO CAN"T THINK, TO HAVE THEM BELIEVE NONSENSE< LIES AND DISTORTIONS< THIS IS SIMPLE, JUST LOOK UP ANYTHING THEY SAY AND YOU WILL FIND HOW MUCH OF THEIR FACTS ARE THE FARTHEST THING FROM FACTS> WITHOUT THE LIES, THE HATE PARTY COULDN"T/ WOULDN"T EXIST
Click to expand...

Now take your BULLSHIT and shove it. Obama isn't in office any longer and is nothing but a pimple on the scrotum of history.
 
jbander said:
Still only supported by the brain dead. You know the origin of this crap was Breitbart I hope.
Click to expand...

This is clearly the ultra-liberal New York Times.



bhsbzj4xe9tz.jpg




BTW, attacking the source is a logical fallacy.
 
Grumpy said:
First off fuck face I was supporting Obama's graduating Magma Cum Laud. But you're to blinded by hatred of conservatives, you ignore it.
Click to expand...
What a pile of crap, anyone who wants can look to see if you supported Obama's anything. You even lie about your lies.
 
Legion said:
This is clearly the ultra-liberal New York Times.



bhsbzj4xe9tz.jpg




BTW, attacking the source is a logical fallacy.
Click to expand...
The word is origin, cowboy , I'll tell you what that means it means they wrote it first. If you have any other problems I"ll try to help you out. Like I said The Origin is Breitbart, live with it.
 
jbander said:
What a pile of crap, anyone who wants can look to see if you supported Obama's anything. You even lie about your lies.
Click to expand...

Oh arguing that Obama did graduate Magma Cum Laud from Harvard isn't supporting Obama? You really have a fucked up way of looking at things.
 
Grumpy said:
You said quote "You have no clue because most of the presidents IQ scores have been configured by other test they took , mostly lsat's. Obama graduated Magma Com laud from Harvard where the average IQ is 140. Give us one of Bush's papers on any subject and I'll give you multiple award wining writings from Obama." Now you didn't say his IQ was 140 but you strongly hinted it was. Typical leftie ploy say something in such a way as to be able to deny it. If you aren't suggesting it's 140 than why bring up the number at all. May I remind you that your response was in regard to my saying Obama's IQ was around 124.

Sorry you can't lie your way out of this one.
Click to expand...
I asked him to prove that I said Obama had a IQ of 140 and somehow my quote tells him that I said it. my full quote"You have no clue because most of the presidents IQ scores have been configured by other test they took , mostly lsat's. Obama graduated Magma Com laud from Harvard where the average IQ is 140. Give us one of Bush's papers on any subject and I'll give you multiple award wining writings from Obama. You won't win this one. " yup nowhere did I say Obama had a IQ of 140. Again the point is that this hate right wing group could not exist without the people who are so easily led that . everything is Gospel if it comes from Rush and Fox Crap News for them. The whole right wing party is made up of lame people. They are called one string puppets or simply the brain dead. At no time in history have so many voted against their best interest.
 
Grumpy said:
Enough loser you fucked up admit it.
Click to expand...
Well buddy that would be a little hard, since the total of what I said is in this thread and it in no way can be perceived as I fucked up with anything. How blind can a person be to make any claim when the truth of the opposite is right in front of everyone. I told you you can't win. and I told everyone that your party can't operate without lies and distortions and you were by far was my best support proving that point. Thanks big guy.
 
Legion said:
How to Debate Leftists and Destroy Them

1. Walk Toward the Fire

“The left knows this is war. And they know you are the enemy. You will be castigated. You will get punched. That’s the way it will go because that’s how the left wins: through intimidation and cruelty. You have to take the punch, you have to brush it off. You have to be willing to take the punch.”

2. Hit First

“Don’t take the punch first. Hit first. Hit hard. Hit where it counts. Mike Tyson used to say, “Everybody has a plan ‘til they get punched in the mouth.” That’s exactly correct. But throwing the first punch requires game-planning. Walking through the door, you have one shot – one! – to put someone down for the count from the beginning of a debate. If done properly, any debate on a single topic can be over within the first 30 seconds.”

3. Frame Your Opponent

“I have argued that the left’s entire playbook consists of a single play: characterizing the opposition. It’s incredibly effective. And the only way to get beyond character arguments is to frame your opponent – make it toxic for your opponent to slur you. Then, hopefully, you can move the debate to more substantive territory. This is the vital first step. It is the only first step…There is no way to convince someone that you don’t hate him or her. You can convince him or her, however, that your opposition is a liar and a hater.”

4. Frame the Debate

“It’s important that you neuter buzzwords quickly, because otherwise you will be arguing against nonsense terms that can be used against you. You can’t argue against empty terms. So don’t accept the premises of their arguments, which are largely buzzword based…It’s important that you neuter those buzzwords quickly, because otherwise you will be arguing against nonsense terms that can be used against you. You can’t argue against empty terms. So don’t accept the premises of their arguments, which are largely buzzword based…As a general matter, the left’s favorite three lines of attack are (1) you’re stupid; (2) you’re racist; (3) you’re corrupt. Donald Trump is supposedly stupid; Donald Trump is supposedly racist; Donald Trump is supposedly corrupt. Take away those lines of attack and watch the discomfort set in.”

5. Spot Inconsistencies in the Left’s Argument

“The left’s arguments are chock full of inconsistencies. Internal inconsistencies — inconsistencies that are inherent to the left’s general worldview. That’s because very few people on the left will acknowledge their actual agenda, which is quite extreme. Leftists prefer to argue half-measures in which they don’t truly believe…There are almost invariably unbridgeable inconsistencies in the left’s publicly stated positions that are at war with their actual fundamental principles. Your goal is to make the left admit once and for all what they believe about policy by exposing those inconsistencies.”

6. Force Leftists to Answer Questions

“This is really just a corollary of Rule #4. Leftists are only comfortable when they are forcing you to answer questions. If they have to answer questions, they begin to scratch their heads. The questions they prefer to ask are about your character; the questions they prefer not to answer are all of them. Instead, they like to dodge issues in favor of those character arguments.”

7. Do Not Get Distracted

“You may notice when arguing with someone on the left that every time you begin to make a point, that leftist begins shouting about Donald Trump. It’s like Leftist Tourette’s Syndrome. “Why did Obama blow out the budget?” “TRUMP!!!!!” Don’t be fooled. You don’t need to follow the idiotic rabbit down into his Trumpyy rabbit hole…Arguing with the left is like attempting to nail jello to the wall. It’s slippery and messy and a waste of resources. You must force them to answer the question.”

8. You Don’t Have To Defend People on Your Side

“Conservatives get trapped in this gambit routinely, because they figure that the enemy of their enemy is their friend: if the left is attacking someone, he must be worth defending. But that’s not true…Don’t follow people. Follow principle.”

9. If You Don’t Know Something, Admit It

“Don’t get caught in the trap of believing you have to know everything about everything. Your opponent will undoubtedly know something you don’t. It’s fair to simply state, “I didn’t know that, but I’ll be happy to research and get back to you.” Another side-note here: don’t bring up a topic with which you aren’t passingly familiar.”

10. Let the Other Side Have Meaningless Victories

“Leftists prize faux moderation above all else; by granting them a point or two, you can convince them that you aren’t a radical right-winger at all. After all, everyone can admit both parties are terrible!…If the left engages you on immigration reform, your answer should be that you are for immigration reform. Now, how do they define immigration reform? That’s the key question. But because you’ve always granted the premise that you like the idea of immigration reform, you don’t look like a naysayer off the bat…The conversation is meaningless until you force the left to define terms. Until then, we can all agree on useless platitudes.”


https://www.theblaze.com/news/2014/03/20/11-rules-for-debating-a-leftist-from-ben-shapiro
Click to expand...
Said the Nazi to the world. Love it.
 
Legion said:
So you say.
Click to expand...
Yup So I say along with anyone who was taught to think for themselves and not be a puppet to possibly the biggest mental case of the year. Who lies 85% of the time. Your hero and God President Scum bag biggest piece of shit in the history of American politics. So mentally ill that he has a hard time deciding whats up and whats down.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top