Cain this all be true?

icedancer2theend

Verified User
Herman Cain is running for president. He's not a career politician (in fact he has never held political office). He's known as a pizza guy, but there's a lot more to him. He's also a computer guy, a banker guy, and a rocket scientist guy.
Here's his bio:

  • Bachelors degree in Mathematics.
  • Masters degree in Computer Science.
  • Mathematician for the Navy, where he worked on missile ballistics (making him a rocket scientist).
  • Computer systems analyst for Coca-Cola.
  • VP of Corporate Data Systems and Services for Pillsbury (this is the top of the ladder in the computer world, being in charge of information systems for a major corporation).

All achieved before reaching the age of 35. Since he reached the top of the information systems world, he changed careers!

  • Business Manager. Took charge of Pillsbury's 400 Burger King restaurants in the Philadelphia area, which were the company's poorest performers in the country. Spent the first nine months learning the business from the ground up, cooking hamburger and yes, cleaning toilets. After three years he had turned them into the company's best performers.

  • Godfather's Pizza CEO. Was asked by Pillsbury to take charge of their Godfather's Pizza chain (which was on the verge of bankruptcy). He made it profitable in 14 months.

  • In 1988 he led a buyout of the Godfather's Pizza chain from Pillsbury. He was now the owner of a restaurant chain. Again he reached the top of the ladder of another industry.

  • He was also chairman of the National Restaurant Association during this time. This is a group that interacts with government on behalf of the restaurant industry, and it gave him political experience from the non-politician side.

Having reached the top of a second industry, he changed careers again!

  • Adviser to the Federal Reserve System. Herman Cain went to work for the Federal Reserve Banking System advising them on how monetary policy changes would affect American businesses.
  • Chairman of the Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank. He worked his way up to the chairmanship of a regional Federal Reserve bank. This is only one step below the chairmanship of the entire Federal Reserve System (the top banking position in the country). This position allowed him to see how monetary policy is made from the inside, and understand the political forces that impact the monetary system.


After reaching the top of the banking industry, he changed careers for a fourth time!

  • Writer and public speaker. He then started to write and speak on leadership. His books include Speak as a Leader, CEO of Self, Leadership is Common Sense, and They Think You Are Stupid.

  • Radio Host. Around 2007, after a remarkable 40 year career he started hosting a radio show on WSB in Atlanta (the largest talk radio station in the country).


He did all this starting from rock bottom (his father was a chauffeur and his mother was a maid). When you add up his accomplishments in his life, including reaching the top of three unrelated industries: information systems, business management, and banking, Herman Cain may have the most impressive resume of anyone that has run for the presidency in the last half century.
 
Excellent! I agree, Herman Cain is phenomenal.

What gets me, is the dismissive perception... How many times have you heard some pundit say; I like Herman Cain... BUT...? Followed by this mental disconnect, that he isn't a politician. Uhm.. duh, that's what is so appealing! He's not a politician. Look, we hear the media and pundits... the 'experts' tell us all about Romney, what a great mastermind of business and economics... but aside from the history of serving as governor, what distinguishes Romney's expertise from Herman Cain's? We somehow elevate Romney to a viable candidate because he has political experience, and Herman isn't a politician.... does that make any sense whatsoever? Herman Cain runs circles around Romney in terms of business accomplishment and achievements, which are Romney's strongest attributes as a candidate....yet we're told, Cain stands no chance. Why is that?
 
Very impressive, I dont even hate his 999 program, but where is he on social issues?
 
Excellent! I agree, Herman Cain is phenomenal.

What gets me, is the dismissive perception... How many times have you heard some pundit say; I like Herman Cain... BUT...? Followed by this mental disconnect, that he isn't a politician. Uhm.. duh, that's what is so appealing! He's not a politician. Look, we hear the media and pundits... the 'experts' tell us all about Romney, what a great mastermind of business and economics... but aside from the history of serving as governor, what distinguishes Romney's expertise from Herman Cain's? We somehow elevate Romney to a viable candidate because he has political experience, and Herman isn't a politician.... does that make any sense whatsoever? Herman Cain runs circles around Romney in terms of business accomplishment and achievements, which are Romney's strongest attributes as a candidate....yet we're told, Cain stands no chance. Why is that?


I Like Romney. I like Cain. I also Like Gingrich; Santorum; and Christie (I here he may jump in this week). Of these folks, Cain gets my primary vote if he's still viable when my state primary rolls around. But the fact of the matter is that this year it is

draft_lens18027987module150707282photo_1307590912Anyone_But_Obama_2012_-_b
 
With all of that, I heard him say irregardless... Which is only a word because so many people incorrectly would use it as such...

Gaaaarrrrgh!

It's regardless. Regardless... Negating a negative doesn't make it better...

;)

I think I can live with that.
 
I Like Romney. I like Cain. I also Like Gingrich; Santorum; and Christie (I here he may jump in this week). Of these folks, Cain gets my primary vote if he's still viable when my state primary rolls around. But the fact of the matter is that this year it is

draft_lens18027987module150707282photo_1307590912Anyone_But_Obama_2012_-_b

He's out...
 
With all of that, I heard him say irregardless... Which is only a word because so many people incorrectly would use it as such...

Gaaaarrrrgh!

It's regardless. Regardless... Negating a negative doesn't make it better...

;)

I think I can live with that.

It is an irksome and grating colloquialism of Americana. But, technically, it has become an accepted word to use. I guess if libs can accept military men to be referred to as dead men by a president- we can live with a president who has used a double negative.
 
Very impressive, I dont even hate his 999 program, but where is he on social issues?

I would assume he is pro-life and anti-gay-marriage, as will be any republican nominated by republicans. But the fact that you had to ask the question, should tell you how much emphasis Cain is placing on social issues. I actually believe he would be more 'libertarian' in his governance, choosing to delegate social issues to the states as much as he could. He is certainly not a social conservative activist.
 
I would assume he is pro-life and anti-gay-marriage, as will be any republican nominated by republicans. But the fact that you had to ask the question, should tell you how much emphasis Cain is placing on social issues. I actually believe he would be more 'libertarian' in his governance, choosing to delegate social issues to the states as much as he could. He is certainly not a social conservative activist.

I dont care if he places an emphisis on social issues, I simply care where he stands on those issues. I care that the person I vote for is in support of FREEDOM. I have studied enough about him since my last post in this thread and have determined he is anti-freedom and does not understand the basics about how and why America was formed as it relates to religous freedom. I could not support the man.
 
I dont care if he places an emphasis on social issues, I simply care where he stands on those issues. I care that the person I vote for is in support of FREEDOM. I have studied enough about him since my last post in this thread and have determined he is anti-freedom and does not understand the basics about how and why America was formed as it relates to religous freedom. I could not support the man.

Obama chose Harold Koh as the legal adviser for the State Department. Harold Koh says that there’s nothing wrong with Sharia law.
JUDGES should interpret the Constitution according to other nations’ legal “norms.” Sharia law could apply to disputes in US courts. The United States constitutes an “axis of disobedience” along with North Korea and Saddam-era Iraq.
Those are the views of the man on track to become one of the US government’s top lawyers: Harold Koh.

An op-ed published last week in the Times with the title, "Don't Fear Islamic Law in America." The op-ed argued that recent efforts by certain states to outlaw Sharia, or Islamic law, "fosters a hostile environment that will stymie the growth of America's tolerant strand of Islam."

Kansas City International Airport officials have acknowledged installing foot-washing benches in a restroom at the airport
KCI Airport recently constructed four foot-washing benches to accommodate a growing number of Muslim drivers who requested the facilities to prepare for daily Islamic prayer.

Indianapolis airport officials have announced plans to add footbaths for Muslims who wish to wash before their five-times-daily prayer rituals,

MCTC staff said foot-washing facilities are available at colleges ranging from Stanford University, the University of Houston, Boston University, St. Cloud State and the University of Minnesota-Duluth.

In 2001, St. Cloud installed a bench and some ground-level faucets in a bathroom-sized room in the student union
====================

And you think Cain is anti-freedom and does not understand the basics about how and why America was formed as it relates to religious freedom.
Try looking at the pinheads in your party and the assholes in our bastions of liberalness in the countries colleges....and Obamas pick for a lawyer in the State Dept......

Jughead....you're still clueless
 
I dont care if he places an emphisis on social issues, I simply care where he stands on those issues. I care that the person I vote for is in support of FREEDOM. I have studied enough about him since my last post in this thread and have determined he is anti-freedom and does not understand the basics about how and why America was formed as it relates to religous freedom. I could not support the man.

How is Cain 'anti-freedom'??? Since you have 'studied' him, you should be able to provide a lot of details....
 
How is Cain 'anti-freedom'??? Since you have 'studied' him, you should be able to provide a lot of details....

Please note above, I now have studied him, the biggest problem is that he has said he would not appoint members of an entire religen to judgeships or cabnent positions, that is inconsistant with Religous Freedom in my opinion. It illistrates a complete misunderstanding of principals of religous freedom that America was founded upon.
 
Please note above, I now have studied him, the biggest problem is that he has said he would not appoint members of an entire religen to judgeships or cabnent positions, that is inconsistant with Religous Freedom in my opinion. It illistrates a complete misunderstanding of principals of religous freedom that America was founded upon.

LINK....
 
Please note above, I now have studied him, the biggest problem is that he has said he would not appoint members of an entire religen to judgeships or cabnent positions, that is inconsistant with Religous Freedom in my opinion. It illistrates a complete misunderstanding of principals of religous freedom that America was founded upon.

For about 200 years, this country would not elect a Catholic to the Presidency and seldom to any high political position in government.....

Bachmann's religion was an issue in the last few weeks....

Romney's Mormonism is becoming an issue for him.....yet

Harry Reid's Mormonism was something most voters were unaware of in the entire country....and never an issue for 25 years.....

What does that illustrate....
 
Cain's the flavor of the month, like Perry was. Once indies get a hint of his social positions, he's done.

Romney is still the favorite.
 
For about 200 years, this country would not elect a Catholic to the Presidency and seldom to any high political position in government.....

Bachmann's religion was an issue in the last few weeks....

Romney's Mormonism is becoming an issue for him.....yet

Harry Reid's Mormonism was something most voters were unaware of in the entire country....and never an issue for 25 years.....

What does that illustrate....


Please review article 6 of the United States Constitution.
 
Back
Top