chicklet: The Dixie Dunce rides again! Here are the FACTS...
The FACTS are as I stated, Obama and Liberals would completely ban guns if they could. To prance around claiming the Democrats are champions of the 2nd Amendment, is almost laughable, if it weren't so absolutely pathetic and such a blatant lie.
Interesting how the Dixie Dunce IGNORES THE FACTS AND REPEATS HIS PERSONAL OPINION, SUPPOSITION AND CONJECTURE AS A SUBSTITUTION. Once again reality makes a chump out of Dixie: http://www.factcheck.org/2008/09/nra-targets-obama/
chciklet: Obviously, Dixie is not aware that thanks to the Health Care Reform, you will have MORE options regarding health care insurance plan.
Well, this is simply not true. Ideally, liberals want us to have only one choice and one option...single payer.
And let me just pull the rug out from Dixie's long winded LIE. "Single Payer" DID NOT PASS THE CONGRESS OR THE SENATE. PERIOD. At present, people are losing their insurance left and right, because they are losing the jobs associated with their insurance, and they can't afford the COBRA option anymore, it has become ridiculous. Those who are fortunate enough to still have a job with health insurance, are watching their premiums increase an average of 150% or more, and they literally have no other option than to pay the higher premiums, and in most cases, for a reduced level of coverage and higher deductibles. I know of not one single American who has seen a DECREASE in health care insurance or cost. NADDA!
And if the Dixie Dunce would look beyond his Drudge induced propaganda he would see that the Health Care Reform does not fully take affect until 2014. Here are some more facts for this Dunce to ignore: http://www.healthreform.gov/about/grandfathering.html If our Dixie Dunce is bitching about rates, then don't blame Obama, blame his vaunted free enterprise and the greed insurance lobby and their GOP cohorts.
chicklet: WTF is Dixie babbling about? I talking about food quality (clean, disease free), and instead of just conceding that point he tries to change the subject by bitching about product cost and making some assinine insinuation that the federal gov't is manipulating prices instead of the consumer! Newsflash, my Dixie Dunce.....THE BRAND NAMES AND PRODUCERS OF THE PRODUCTS DETERMINE THE PRICES, AND ARE SUBJECT TO CONSUMER CHOICE/ADVOCACY. In other words, if enough people don't buy your product in favor of a cheaper one of equal quality (or just stop purchasing your product altogether), prices will change! In other words, you don't like prices, get off your duff and complain to your grocer or get active in consumer price regulation groups. Free enterprise, bunky....it's a two way street.
It's nice to see you are trying to understand how capitalism works and how price is determined, but let me help you out here... The costs of complying with governmental mandates and regulations, has to be paid for by the company, who have to recover this cost when they determine the price a consumer will pay. Everything you purchase includes the cost of these mandates. Now, let's have an example to illustrate how it works: You are a company producing widgets... it costs you (normally) $1 to make a widget, pay your employees, benefits, insurance, etc. and have a reasonable profit for your shareholders. Now comes the government with a new mandate that widgets must meet in order to be produced.... whatever that costs the company, is simply divided by the number of widgets expected to sell. So now, the same $1 widget cost $2 because of the burden of the mandates. And maybe $2 is more than the market wants to pay for a widget? If so, the company eventually goes out of business because it has no market for $2 widgets.
The same is true with meat or food. We pay a certain price, but that price includes paying for all the regulations and mandates. Now, I am not saying we don't need any government oversight on food quality, but the point is, the more we allow government to heap on mandates and guidelines, the more we cause the price to increase. If we are paying this cost with the expectations that all our food will always be safe, we are foolish, because the government can simply never make such a guarantee. They can institute guidelines and regulations, and they can fine people for not following them, but they can't ensure that everyone will always follow the guidelines and that all food is always safe.
Notice how the Dixie Dunce blows a lot of smoke with his supposition and conjecture that has NOTHING to do with reality, nor does it change the fact based points and conclusions I made. Poor Dixie...he just babbles like an ass when he can't admit someone else is right. So essentially Dixie wants to recreate the FDA with some fantasy cross corporate consortium....as if that's going to get him a better deal? And where is Dixie’s documentation to back up his scenarios? Bottom line: to date, Dixie cannot provide evidence that there is massive cases of food poisoning let alone product failure....mind you, nothing is perfect and improvement can be made...but dummies like Dixie just use that as an excuse to fulfill some libertarian lunkhead utopian dream...when we have a history of why the FDA was created in the first place.
chicklet: Ahhh, but ONLY if you're NOT a 1% that benefits from the Bush tax cuts!
According to Obama, the Bush tax cuts needed to be extended "to avoid millions of middle class Americans from seeing a tax increase." Are you telling me he was LYING? I'm so sorry that you are so ignorant you believe the Bush tax cuts only benefited the top 1%, but it's a documented fact that the Bush tax cuts lowered the taxes for EVERY tax payer.
Are you really this willfully ignorant, Dixie? The whole point of the Ryan Bill is a a repeat of the Bush tax cuts…which have NOT created JOBS! And only a FOOL would deny who benefitted from the Shrub's tax cuts. Here are more FACTS for your Dixie dumb ass to ignore: http://www.responsibletaxes.org/reso...omic-policies/
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/03/doe...-taxes-or-not/
chicklet: And yet there's no nation wide cases of cholera or disintary. (spl) Someone needs to educate the Dixie Dunce as to how water quality control varies from STATE to STATE in COMPLIANCE with Fed regulatory law. If the Dixie Dunce is so concerned about his local water quality, then he'd best go bitch to his local rep in his State's gov't.
LMAO... so now.... one of the big things you think we should give credit and praise to Obama for, you are now telling me is none of his business and I should go bitch to my State? I hate to point this out, but isn't this typical these days? Blame someone else when you can't get the job done using your own idiotic plan? Amazing!!
What’s amazing here is the sheer intellectual dishonesty of this chuckling chowderhead Dixie Dunce, who initially alluded to a sole failure of the federal gov’t to guarantee clean water. I challenged him to document such a failure and explained to him that the federal gov’t works with State gov’t to insure water quality. Dixie is obviously ignorant of how things work in this country regarding State and Federal gov’t regulations, compliances, But rather than just concede a point, the Dixie Dunce LIES about what I stated…..an absurd move given the chronology of the post exposes Dixie attempts.
chicklet: The Dixie Dunce rides again! Dixie just can't stand acknowledging a FACT that rips apart his Anti-Obama rhetoric, so he just relies on a neocon/teabagger wet dream of supposition and conjecture to substitute for FACT.
Might help if you actually posted a fact.
The chronology of the posts shows that I did, YOU and your like minded cohorts just IGNORE them in favor of your personal supposition and conjecture.
chicklet: Newsflash for the Dixie Dunce: THAT IS WHAT AN ARREST AND TRIAL IS FOR, TO DETERMINE IF A FATAL SHOOTING WAS INDEED "ACCIDENTAL" OR A CASE OF MANSLAUGHTER OR SELF DEFENSE. And since Zimmerman ACTIVELY PURSUED a man he already profiled as a dangerous criminal AFTER HE ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THE POLICE WERE ON THEIR WAY AND HE DID NOT HAVE TO PURSUE MARTIN, there is reasonable doubt to his claim of "accident" or "self defense". Would Dixie be so adamant in his knee -jerk assertion if Martin killed Zimmerman and claimed "accident" or "self defense" or envoked the Stand Your Ground Law? Hmmmmm?
Don't you mean: since Zimmerman ALLEGEDLY perused a man that he had ALLEGEDLY profiled? And how do you know he continued to pursue Martin, were you there? How do you know Martin didn't attack him? YOU made the comment that people are entitled to a RIGHT to a fair trial by a jury of their peers, but is that what you have done for Zimmerman? Or have you already convicted the man in the court of public opinion?
And yet another example of the Dixie Dunce’s revisionist bent. The timeline AS ESTABLISHED BY THE 911 CALL RECORD clearly has Zimmerman confirming that Martin was “running away”, and that the dispatch CONFIRMED that Zimmerman was STILL following Martin (“we don’t need you to do that” to which Zimmerman replies “okay”). To date NONE of Zimmerman's legal reps have stated that Martin RETURNED TO CONFRONT ZIMMERMAN WHEN HE STOPPED FOLLOWING HIM. A matter of fact, a matter of history that dopes like Dixie just want to ignore. Once put on trial, you get to bring in ALL THE EVIDENCE (foresnics, testimonies, recordings) and have a cross examination of the facts. Since the initial call was for Zimmerman to be arrested based on the preliminary evidence (and the evaluation of the Chief detective on the scene), we now have to see if Zimmerman even gets to trial. The Justice system…not perfect, but NOT the minority based bias debacle the neocon/teabagger/Confederate flag waving bumpkins would have us believe.
chicklet: And yet another wild assertion that the Dixie Dunce swallowed from right wing mantras posted by Koch Brothers think tanks, Limbaugh and Drudge. To date, the GAO and the CBO DO NOT AGREE with the absurd assertion Dixie puts for here....especially since Social Security is received only by those who draw a paycheck.
The aggregate total cost in dollar amount of all entitlement programs currently established by our government, is over $100 trillion. This is supported by anyone or any entity who has ever added up the total cost of all the government programs available. I don't know the Koch Brothers, or if they have said this, but it is a true statement, regardless.
Facts addressed... chicklet
PWNED....
AGAIN!
Bookmarks