A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
I'm pointing out to you the way people prioritize based on their personal interests. I don't think anybody, liberal or conservative, disagrees that what happened in Benghazi was a tragedy. Yet we have plenty of tragedies right here in the US that get overlooked such as the one about guns getting into the hands of babies. You don't think that's horrible?
The fact is that more babies killed with guns here in the US than militants killed at the consulate in Benghazi. And people like me care about both those things.
“What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
― Charles Dickens
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
So possession of stolen property only holds true if you had the INTENTION of possessing stolen property??
Your car CAN'T be impounded, if you're stopped and your passenger is found to be in possession of drugs; seeing as how everyone says it's your responsibility to make sure your passenger AREN'T carrying drugs?
You're insane.
SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.
You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!
Phantasmal (05-06-2016)
No. it's definately something -wanton disregard for procedure ( afterall she had ONLY the private server) She corresponded regularly with Blumenthal
despite his being banned by Obama.
She made no attempt to use State's Level2 server (classified) which was never hacked ( unlike level 1) - + plus the big thing
is her inability or disregard to see what what innately classified " so called born classified" which as Sec.of State she could do and understand.
You have gross neglect here. Is it criminal? It's surely wanton disregard for security -using her Blackberry on Mahogany Row..when officials specifically told her not to use her Email there
If all this isn't criminal, it's right upto the line, only saved by intent.Black*Berry was digitally tethered to a private email server in the basement of her family home, some 260 miles to the north in Chappaqua, N.Y., documents and interviews show.
But Democrats would vote for her if she made a deal with the devil for POTUS..She's still calling it a security review. Sanders still won't touch it..
She's a pathetic arrogance of power, corporatist, warmonger, and failure as Sec of State..wall street lackey.
*barf* - I'd vote for Trump over her if pushed - but he's so crappy it's a Hobson's choice
Using your knowledge of the law, illegal alien, Francisco Sanchez, cannot be held responsible for the killing a San Francisco woman in front of her father in San Francisco because he had no intention of killing the women.....in his pending trial, what do you think he will be charged with ?
Put blame where it belongs
ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.
Bookmarks