Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: Our corporate overlords vow to bury populist candidates in a sea off cash

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,788
    Thanks
    35,476
    Thanked 50,287 Times in 27,095 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default Our corporate overlords vow to bury populist candidates in a sea off cash

    Fighting the forces of progressive change for 150 years.......


    Chamber of Commerce vows to punish anti-business candidates
    AP

    “We plan to build a grass-roots business organization so strong that when it bites you in the butt, you bleed,” chamber President Tom Donohue said. The group indicates it will spend in excess of the approximately $60 million it put out in the last presidential cycle.

    By Tom Hamburger, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
    January 8, 2008

    WASHINGTON -- Alarmed at the increasingly populist tone of the 2008 political campaign, the president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is set to issue a fiery promise to spend millions of dollars to defeat candidates deemed to be anti-business.

    "We plan to build a grass-roots business organization so strong that when it bites you in the butt, you bleed," chamber President Tom Donohue said.

    The warning from the nation's largest trade association came against a background of mounting popular concern over the condition of the economy. A weak record of job creation, the sub-prime mortgage crisis, declining home values and other problems have all helped make the economy a major campaign issue.

    Presidential candidates in particular have responded to the public concern. Former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina has been the bluntest populist voice, but other front-running Democrats, including Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, have also called for change on behalf of middle-class voters.

    On the Republican side, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee -- emerging as an unexpected front-runner after winning the Iowa caucuses -- has used populist themes in his effort to woo independent voters, blasting bonus pay for corporate chief executives and the effect of unfettered globalization on workers.

    Reacting to what it sees as a potentially hostile political climate, Donohue said, the chamber will seek to punish candidates who target business interests with their rhetoric or policy proposals, including congressional and state-level candidates.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...ck=1&cset=true

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,857
    Thanks
    3,734
    Thanked 20,360 Times in 14,088 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Fighting the forces of progressive change for 150 years.......
    God Bless them. This loony economic rhetoric Huckabee and Edwards spout may sound good to the ill informed but in the real world is poison to the overall American economy.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,788
    Thanks
    35,476
    Thanked 50,287 Times in 27,095 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    God Bless them. This loony economic rhetoric Huckabee and Edwards spout may sound good to the ill informed but in the real world is poison to the overall American economy.
    So you think NAFTA worked out well for americans at large? Interesting.

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    20,135
    Thanks
    325
    Thanked 4,725 Times in 2,959 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 333 Times in 317 Posts

    Default

    The Chamber of Commerce is one of the most venal institutions in the country. I can't stand those fucks.

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,857
    Thanks
    3,734
    Thanked 20,360 Times in 14,088 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    So you think NAFTA worked out well for americans at large? Interesting.
    There are literally hundreds and hundreds of trade and other kind of deals made by the government and all you can go back to is NAFTA as if that is the only deal the government has ever negotiated.

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,788
    Thanks
    35,476
    Thanked 50,287 Times in 27,095 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    There are literally hundreds and hundreds of trade and other kind of deals made by the government and all you can go back to is NAFTA as if that is the only deal the government has ever negotiated.
    Yeah, WTO has been a real boon to america. And they screw over developing countries too.

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,788
    Thanks
    35,476
    Thanked 50,287 Times in 27,095 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Oh, the China free trade agreement worked out really well for working americans too cawacko.

  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,857
    Thanks
    3,734
    Thanked 20,360 Times in 14,088 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Yeah, WTO has been a real boon to america. And they screw over developing countries too.
    The days of the '50's and '60's where a guy could graduate high school and get a high paying job through the union at a steel mill are over. There is too much competition in the world now. Either we face it and compete in that space or try to hide and live in the past.

    Capitalism and free markets do have create destruction. That is what has to led to American's having the highest standard of living on the planet and helped to spread more prosperity around the globe. Unfortunately with it comes a lot of upheavel and people have less secure jobs etc.

    We are all free to support what we want but the choices are pretty clear.

  9. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,788
    Thanks
    35,476
    Thanked 50,287 Times in 27,095 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    The days of the '50's and '60's where a guy could graduate high school and get a high paying job through the union at a steel mill are over. There is too much competition in the world now. Either we face it and compete in that space or try to hide and live in the past.

    Capitalism and free markets do have create destruction. That is what has to led to American's having the highest standard of living on the planet and helped to spread more prosperity around the globe. Unfortunately with it comes a lot of upheavel and people have less secure jobs etc.

    We are all free to support what we want but the choices are pretty clear.

    then why do many strong, euntrepeneurial countries like finland, sweden, and others continue to have strong labor unions, and a comfortable middle class lifestyle?

  10. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,857
    Thanks
    3,734
    Thanked 20,360 Times in 14,088 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    then why do many strong, euntrepeneurial countries like finland, sweden, and others continue to have strong labor unions, and a comfortable middle class lifestyle?
    I don't follow their countries or their economies so I have no idea. But its pretty clear across the globe that countries that support property rights, the rule of law and have the most free markets are at the top of the economic ladder. The reason being it allows entrepreneurs the opportunity to take risks and from those risks come many of the tools, technologies etc. that we use on a daily basis.

    Again, the idea that one is going to get in a union and work at the same job for 30 years until retirement is old school. The world has evolved.

  11. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,788
    Thanks
    35,476
    Thanked 50,287 Times in 27,095 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    I don't follow their countries or their economies so I have no idea. But its pretty clear across the globe that countries that support property rights, the rule of law and have the most free markets are at the top of the economic ladder. The reason being it allows entrepreneurs the opportunity to take risks and from those risks come many of the tools, technologies etc. that we use on a daily basis.

    Again, the idea that one is going to get in a union and work at the same job for 30 years until retirement is old school. The world has evolved.

    You can have free market, strong unions, and a decent social democratic welfare state, and be successful. There are numerous and ample examples.

    You won't find one successful example of a "property rights" state that implements the policies of traditional american economic libertarians, like Ron Paul.

  12. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,857
    Thanks
    3,734
    Thanked 20,360 Times in 14,088 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    You can have free market, strong unions, and a decent social democratic welfare state, and be successful. There are numerous and ample examples.

    You won't find one successful example of a "property rights" state that implements the policies of traditional american economic libertarians, like Ron Paul.
    I'm not even talking about going as far as what Ron Paul would like. Look at what America has today. It is on top of the economic world. Western Europe's growth has definitely slowed and Eastern Europe is trying to overcome the shackles of its centrally planned economy.

    China has finally opened up its economy, though it refuses to admit it, and could pass the U.S. later in this century. It has had tremendous, albeit risky, gowth the past couple of decades. India has opened its economy some and large numbers of people are moving into the middle class. Latin America is still stuck in populist policies and is experiencing minimal growth in standards of living.

    It's not about living a full economic libertarians dream but the real world results of property rights, rule of law and freer markets speaks for itself.

  13. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Convington, La
    Posts
    22,763
    Thanks
    2,261
    Thanked 543 Times in 432 Posts
    Groans
    1,642
    Groaned 623 Times in 562 Posts

    Default

    It's always non business types whinning about this stuff.
    It's why Edwards is done, Americans like corporations and the highest world standard of living they bring us. Yes the next dem should beef up the SEC and reign in the CEO'S and corp boards. But we're too smart to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

  14. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,685
    Thanks
    6,597
    Thanked 12,131 Times in 9,660 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 504 Times in 477 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    The days of the '50's and '60's where a guy could graduate high school and get a high paying job through the union at a steel mill are over. There is too much competition in the world now. Either we face it and compete in that space or try to hide and live in the past.

    Capitalism and free markets do have create destruction. That is what has to led to American's having the highest standard of living on the planet and helped to spread more prosperity around the globe. Unfortunately with it comes a lot of upheavel and people have less secure jobs etc.

    We are all free to support what we want but the choices are pretty clear.
    But now with the recent "moral innovation" of allowing slave goods into international markets it has become a race to the bottom. How can free people compete with slaves, ever? You're morally repugnant and anti-american.

  15. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Convington, La
    Posts
    22,763
    Thanks
    2,261
    Thanked 543 Times in 432 Posts
    Groans
    1,642
    Groaned 623 Times in 562 Posts

    Default

    the anit-business twit Edwards was soundly repudiated twice.
    He's spending his money now to hear the downtroden chear for him. Its a pity

Similar Threads

  1. Cash for Trash
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-23-2008, 06:17 PM
  2. Tonight, I had to bury our dog...
    By Damocles in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-04-2007, 02:52 PM
  3. Corporate media
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-03-2007, 06:46 AM
  4. Democrats beware: An economic populist in rising in the GOP
    By Cypress in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-16-2007, 05:11 AM
  5. Spy vs. Spy: Corporate Espionage
    By NewsBoy in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-02-2006, 09:39 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •