Now dont go throwing my old ass under the bus quite yet. I have made no personal comments on the validity one way or the other. I simple offered the data for all to consume that there is two sides to every story. I do believe Trump exaggerated. I cannot look away from the validity of the New York Times and Washington Post releasing those stories can you? Now I like koolaid with my whiskey every so often but I'm not quite the koolaid drinker I think your making me out to be
Not all lies are the same. Clinton was caught dead to rights using an un-authorized server, transversing marked and un-marked classified data.
Her March 2015 UN speech of "explanation" was all a pack of lies; from the "i had authorization to use it" to "wiping the server with a cloth".
as all her lies were exposed over the next 18 months, she defaulted to yet another lie.
Finally she said Comey had cleared her as not lieing to the American people -which was the final lie..
These were systematic lies told over time directly to the American people-and as her lies fell apart she invented new lies to cover herself
What the fuck are you talking about?
What do you think Wolf and I think happened? IT IS TRUMP THAT IS SAYING THAT THOUSANDS & THOUSANDS OF MUSLIMS WERE CELEBRATING ON ROOFTOPS. In the mind of the average braindead Trump supporter, the onus is now on others to prove that did NOT happen?
Are you fucking kidding me?
Conspiracy theory. How could such a thing have happened without making national news, or being aired over and over through the years? Siegel's article was removed from the Post website while other 911 articles were kept.
"The problem is that Siegel, a scholar-in-residence at St. Francis College in Brooklyn and senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, didn’t witness any of it firsthand, and today, a decade and a half after the fact, he can no longer remember who told him about it. While he continues to believe some Muslims were celebrating after 9/11, he also thinks Trump is exaggerating for effect. “I think something did happen,” he told Daily Intelligencer, “[and] he exaggerated — he often exaggerates.”
Siegel told Daily Intelligencer that he first heard about the celebrations (and the nationalities of the perpetrators) on the radio, though he couldn’t remember which station.
Siegel was straightforward and honest about what he did and didn’t remember — there was no exaggeration in his account. But the lack of specifics is familiar and seems to fit a pattern: In the chaos immediately following the attacks, there were all sorts of rumors, on the radio and elsewhere, of people in Paterson celebrating the destruction that had just occurred across the Hudson. But basically every attempt to actually verify the existence of such celebrations has hit a dead end."
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer...lls-short.html
“What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
― Charles Dickens
Bookmarks