Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23

Thread: Obama Used Psuedonym To Email Clinton on Private Server

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    23,116
    Thanks
    1,050
    Thanked 49 Times in 40 Posts
    Groans
    2,732
    Groaned 648 Times in 283 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    I have to see the document,, who knows..none of this minutia matters. It's silly nitpicking
    So you suddenly don't care now that Domer pointed out the obvious.

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion Troll View Post
    So you suddenly don't care now that Domer pointed out the obvious.
    obvious minutia..
    There is no point debating anything else with him-he's got his mind made up.

    The Emails are complicated -the storyline ( and I don't mean "narrative") is a serial descent from Hillary's big lies
    to desperate clinging to Comey.

    But every time I think it's played out -some new grotesque twist comes along to make it yet more reprehensible

  3. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    23,116
    Thanks
    1,050
    Thanked 49 Times in 40 Posts
    Groans
    2,732
    Groaned 648 Times in 283 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    There is no point debating anything else with him-he's got his mind made up.
    Irony abounds.

  4. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    State IT official warned Clinton 'inner circle' about concerns with email setup

    The State Department technician who set up Hillary Clinton’s private server told FBI officials that he conveyed internal concerns that the setup violated federal record-keeping rules to Clinton’s “inner circle,” according to investigation notes released Friday afternoon.

    Bryan Pagliano told investigators that in 2009, two State IT specialists asked him whether he was aware of the clintonemail.com domain, then asked him to relay to Clinton’s team that the server could be a federal records retention issue.

    Pagliano conveyed the message to Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s chief of staff during her tenure as secretary of State.
    He told investigators that Mills replied that other secretaries of State had also used private email accounts, citing Colin Powell.* Not a private server*

    The details come from 189 pages of notes from the FBI’s interviews with State officials, Clinton aides, IT technicians who worked on the server and others, released late Friday afternoon.

    The pages contain a few previously-unknown tidbits — including the revelation that Clinton at one point had a Gmail account, used so an unnamed aide could send her articles of interest to read.
    But the aide said he was “fairly sure” that the account was never used after it was opened.

    Many of the officials interviewed expressed little alarm about the email set-up, describing it largely as business as usual.

    One official, whose name was withheld from the FBI, did appear shocked when shown an email exchange that had been sent through the unclassified server.

    “Wow,” the official responded, before declining to answer further questions on the exchange. When he was escorted to the elevator following the interview, the official told an agent that “after seeing the above referenced documents, he now understood why people were concerned about this matter.”

    Pagliano and Mills both received some form of immunity from the Department of Justice for their participation in the probe.

    Mills’s deal is restricted to information found on a laptop computer she used to sort Clinton’s private emails from the work emails turned over to the State Department in December 2014.

    Dozens of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) cases on Clinton’s private email are still working their way through the civil court system.

    http://thehill.com/policy/national-s...about-internal

  5. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,970
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,173 Times in 10,391 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    State IT official warned Clinton 'inner circle' about concerns with email setup

    The State Department technician who set up Hillary Clinton’s private server told FBI officials that he conveyed internal concerns that the setup violated federal record-keeping rules to Clinton’s “inner circle,” according to investigation notes released Friday afternoon.

    Bryan Pagliano told investigators that in 2009, two State IT specialists asked him whether he was aware of the clintonemail.com domain, then asked him to relay to Clinton’s team that the server could be a federal records retention issue.

    Pagliano conveyed the message to Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s chief of staff during her tenure as secretary of State.
    He told investigators that Mills replied that other secretaries of State had also used private email accounts, citing Colin Powell.* Not a private server*

    The details come from 189 pages of notes from the FBI’s interviews with State officials, Clinton aides, IT technicians who worked on the server and others, released late Friday afternoon.

    The pages contain a few previously-unknown tidbits — including the revelation that Clinton at one point had a Gmail account, used so an unnamed aide could send her articles of interest to read.
    But the aide said he was “fairly sure” that the account was never used after it was opened.

    Many of the officials interviewed expressed little alarm about the email set-up, describing it largely as business as usual.

    One official, whose name was withheld from the FBI, did appear shocked when shown an email exchange that had been sent through the unclassified server.

    “Wow,” the official responded, before declining to answer further questions on the exchange. When he was escorted to the elevator following the interview, the official told an agent that “after seeing the above referenced documents, he now understood why people were concerned about this matter.”

    Pagliano and Mills both received some form of immunity from the Department of Justice for their participation in the probe.

    Mills’s deal is restricted to information found on a laptop computer she used to sort Clinton’s private emails from the work emails turned over to the State Department in December 2014.

    Dozens of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) cases on Clinton’s private email are still working their way through the civil court system.

    http://thehill.com/policy/national-s...about-internal
    We need another investigation.

  6. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    We need another investigation.
    10,000 more to be released..after the election. People either seem to get it or not. Mostly not.

  7. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,970
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,173 Times in 10,391 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    10,000 more to be released..after the election. People either seem to get it or not. Mostly not.
    Probably 5 or 6 more investigations will find something.

  8. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Probably 5 or 6 more investigations will find something.
    nope. It is what it is. Congress can scream about the FBI's immunities, or Platte River Bleahbiting the hard drive,
    despite subpoena...if Comey says no intent, then no intent it is..

    Few really take the time to look at the sordid tale, and no newspaper publishes anything except bits and pieces -
    so it's a bunch of chopped up incidents that have no relation without context.

    There is her serial lying -the grand devolution from "nothing classified" to nothing marked with a classified header-
    but most don't understand what "born classified is" anyway..

    At best she's "untrustworthy"..even though she's blamed everyone else but herself, including her staff and Comey.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-01-2016, 11:04 AM
  2. Replies: 29
    Last Post: 03-07-2016, 08:40 AM
  3. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-25-2016, 05:20 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-23-2016, 05:58 PM
  5. Replies: 97
    Last Post: 01-25-2016, 10:24 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •