Possible Charges

[evince]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismis...ys_controversy


On December 7, 2006, the George W. Bush administration's Department of Justice ordered the unprecedented[1] midterm dismissal of seven United States Attorneys. Congressional investigations focused on whether the Department of Justice and the White House were using the U.S. Attorney positions for political advantage. Allegations were that some of the attorneys were targeted for dismissal to impede investigations of Republican politicians or that some were targeted for their failure to initiate investigations that would damage Democratic politicians or hamper Democratic-leaning voters.[2][3] The U.S. attorneys were replaced with interim appointees, under provisions in the 2005 USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization.[4][5][6] [7][8]

[evince]

lol I wonder how the FBI will react to a Trump president if he were to win. then the corruption would have to end.

I almost want him to win just so the corrupt DOJ would be reformed. But then again, that would mean trump would be president and that would not be cool. Weird how this works

well you are anti constitution

[Rune]

it's a silly topic. The first thing is that DoJ is gonna squash much of this when she's in. The political appointees there now will stay or be replaced with her minions.
It's becoming evident that DoJ would have never have enpowered a grand jury -even if Comey called for one back in July ( Emails)
DoJ is hopelessly partisan..it's been creeping that way, but full blown under Obama.

Clinton gets to put her own people in,, is she gonna look for "impartiality?" obviously not.

It's not just Clinton, it's her entire apparatchiks that move into the POTUS -we are screwed.

Conveniently ignores 8 years of Dubya.
What an idiot you truly are.

[Rune]

lol I wonder how the FBI will react to a Trump president if he were to win. then the corruption would have to end.

I almost want him to win just so the corrupt DOJ would be reformed. But then again, that would mean trump would be president and that would not be cool. Weird how this works

The stupid is strong in this one.

[Althea]

Yeah, keep breathing while Lynch feverishly tries to find the definition of JUSTICE. Attachment 3424

It's hard to find anything when you're still laughing at the FBI for bringing a Breitbart book as evidence.

I know it's the standard for many here, but in the real world, it's just a bunch of nonsense.

[Althea]

I never tired to make it seem like any such thing. Are you stating that these are not "possible" charges? Hannity certainly has access to legal experts- Do you?

What 'Possible' charges could be brought against Trump?

Rape
Racketeering
Tax Evasion

I could go on. Do we always obsess about what 'possible' issues a candidate has?

[J Craft]

What 'Possible' charges could be brought against Trump?

Rape
Racketeering
Tax Evasion

I could go on. Do we always obsess about what 'possible' issues a candidate has?

You can pretend that what Clinton is being investigated for is no "there there", but the only way that charges are not brought, is if she wins.

[Rune]

You can pretend that what Clinton is being investigated for is no "there there", but the only way that charges are not brought, is if she wins.

USAFREEDOM911?
Is that you?
No one else could say something this stupid.

[christiefan915]

I never tired to make it seem like any such thing. Are you stating that these are not "possible" charges? Hannity certainly has access to legal experts- Do you?

Then why didn't you post a link so we could examine it further?

[christiefan915]

You know, laws are available for all to see.

Sure, if you've convinced yourself they apply to the person. I can do a list like that for Trump too.

[J Craft]

Then why didn't you post a link so we could examine it further?

WTF does it matter? I made it VERY clear that the list were of "possible charges". I ask you again, are you stating the list does not represent possible charges? A former AG says they are.

[christiefan915]

WTF does it matter? I made it VERY clear that the list were of "possible charges". I ask you again, are you stating the list does not represent possible charges? A former AG says they are.

It matters that Ghouliani is a Trump surrogate and by definition, biased.

[J Craft]

It matters that Ghouliani is a Trump surrogate and by definition, biased.

LOL so your response is to call names, instead of just a simple yes or no. You are insipidly predictable.

[christiefan915]

LOL so your response is to call names, instead of just a simple yes or no. You are insipidly predictable.

Lol. The article is a year old. Wonder why nobody's acted on it?

"Posted Friday, November 13th 2015 @ 12pm by Hannity.com Staff"

[Althea]

You can pretend that what Clinton is being investigated for is no "there there", but the only way that charges are not brought, is if she wins.

While on the other hand, you pretend that Clinton is being investigated outside of the case that was deemed 'not worthy of prosecution' by the non Breitbart wing of the FBI?