WANTED:PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATE-NO EXPERIENCE REQUIRED!!

**MAGA MAN** · 09-09-2016, 03:09 PM

We've had lots of presidents with lots of prior political experience who have been disasters of late. It's about time we ran GovCo like a business, beholden to its customers, instead of like a master dictating to his servants.

**domer76** · 09-09-2016, 03:14 PM

Originally Posted by Right

We've had lots of presidents with lots of prior political experience who have been disasters of late. It's about time we ran GovCo like a business, beholden to its customers, instead of like a master dictating to his servants.

Perhaps the first thing Trump could do is declare bankruptcy. That's ONE thing he has experience in.

**MAGA MAN** · 09-09-2016, 03:26 PM

Lots of businesses are forced to declare bankruptcy. If that disqualifies Trump, then Clinton should be disqualified for theft, an actual crime. Who was it that stole $200,000 worth of furniture the last time she was a residence of the White House?

**Bill** · 09-09-2016, 03:28 PM

Originally Posted by Right

Lots of businesses are forced to declare bankruptcy. If that disqualifies Trump, then Clinton should be disqualified for theft, an actual crime. Who was it that stole $200,000 worth of furniture the last time she was a residence of the White House?

Wouldn't that be nice, not having the two ppl with the highest negatives of all time running against each other.........

**MAGA MAN** · 09-09-2016, 03:31 PM

Originally Posted by Bill

Wouldn't that be nice, not having the two ppl with the highest negatives of all time running against each other.........

I attribute that to the "attack politics" that The Clinton's themselves perfected back when Billy Bob was Prez.

**Hillary4Ever** · 09-09-2016, 04:01 PM

Originally Posted by Bill

They complained Obama didn't have enough experience.........

So they support a man that has none..

That second picture is an instant classic.

Can you imagine what the great Ronald Reagan would say about Trump's little love affair with Putin?

**anatta** · 09-09-2016, 04:20 PM

Originally Posted by Bill

Wouldn't that be nice, not having the two ppl with the highest negatives of all time running against each other.........

too bad sanders didn't make it. His numbers were better then Clinton's, and he was a much better candidate then either of these.

**PostmodernProphet** · 09-09-2016, 05:09 PM

Originally Posted by Establishment

Cool. What did Douchebag Donald do in the Senate?

?????......what did you do in the New York real estate market?......

**PostmodernProphet** · 09-09-2016, 05:10 PM

Originally Posted by Establishment

It is if you suck at it. Since she was a lousy SoS, I guess you could say that it offsets. OTOH, when she vacated her post, he thought that she had done a terrific job, so what does that say about his judgement?

that its improved a great deal......

**PostmodernProphet** · 09-09-2016, 05:11 PM

Originally Posted by domer76

Perhaps you should read the article cited by your pal, Anatta. Then you wouldn't be posting out of ignorance.

I don't need to read the article, I was watching the news that year.......you children who were playing pokemon at the time have to read about it......

**Bill** · 09-09-2016, 05:54 PM

Originally Posted by Right

I attribute that to the "attack politics" that The Clinton's themselves perfected back when Billy Bob was Prez.

Are you trying to imply trumpf isn't doing it?? THAT IS ALL HE HAS DONE SINCE HE ANNOUNCED..

They are just getting started, it will get much muddier............ I don't think I will even watch the debate, it is going to be ugly.........

**Bill** · 09-09-2016, 05:58 PM

Originally Posted by Hillary4Ever

That second picture is an instant classic.

Can you imagine what the great Ronald Reagan would say about Trump's little love affair with Putin?

I honestly can imagine what he would say, I know he would be deeply disappointed in the gop for letting this happen....

**domer76** · 09-09-2016, 05:59 PM

Originally Posted by Right

Lots of businesses are forced to declare bankruptcy. If that disqualifies Trump, then Clinton should be disqualified for theft, an actual crime. Who was it that stole $200,000 worth of furniture the last time she was a residence of the White House?

The guy said it was time to run government as a business, which shows an ignorance of how government works, much like the ignorance Trump demonstrates. He's good at declaring bankruptcy, hence the comment.

Your other claim is horseshit.

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinto...use-furniture/

**domer76** · 09-09-2016, 06:08 PM

Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet

I don't need to read the article, I was watching the news that year.......you children who were playing pokemon at the time have to read about it......

Then you post out of ignorance, because I was referring to the article. So, I guess that means the guy is FOS. I agree

**MAGA MAN** · 09-09-2016, 06:27 PM

Originally Posted by domer76

The guy said it was time to run government as a business, which shows an ignorance of how government works, much like the ignorance Trump demonstrates. He's good at declaring bankruptcy, hence the comment.

Your other claim is horseshit.

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinto...use-furniture/

Running GovCo like a business is only ignorant according to libtards, like you.

From your link: "About $50,000 of the total comprised items they had removed but were later determined to belong to the government." So the total may be off a bit. That's still grand theft.