Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678
Results 106 to 113 of 113

Thread: England secedes from EU. Why couldn't the South secede in 1861?

  1. #106 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Establishment View Post
    The attack on Fort Sumner was technically the act of treason. Secession was simply a stupid decision whose implementation was possibly illegal, which was debated at the time, as now.
    Fort Sumner is in New Mexico!!


  2. #107 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    108
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 91 Times in 52 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 4 Times in 4 Posts

    Default

    "England secedes from EU. Why couldn't the South secede in 1861?"

    This fails as a false comparison fallacy.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to F_Donald_Weldon For This Post:

    Rune (07-01-2016)

  4. #108 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,354
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,676 Times in 14,049 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

    Default

    Moronic traitors fail to understanding what the difference is between withdrawing from a legal framework and declaring independence from an overlord.

    Put in American terms, secession is when a state removes itself from the Constitution (or group of counties remove themselves from a state), revolution is when a citizens militia marches on DC and destroys the Constitutional government (most likely resulting in a tyranny, such as the Reign of Terror).

  5. #109 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Cymru/'Wales'
    Posts
    8,017
    Thanks
    4,017
    Thanked 3,456 Times in 2,386 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 941 Times in 861 Posts

    Default

    The UK didn't 'secede' from the EU but votred to make use of an agreed treaty-right. England has no government, unless it secedes from the UK, which, since its bosses dominate and loot it, it is unlikely to do.

  6. #110 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    4,458
    Thanks
    227
    Thanked 450 Times in 381 Posts
    Groans
    7
    Groaned 552 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Right View Post
    A better question is, why did the Confederacy secede at all? Lincoln campaigned on keeping slavery out of the territories, not The South. Then, after secession, why did the Confederate Army attack Fort Sumter?
    Because the southern states composed of twenty five percent of the population of the country and southerners were paying seventy five percent of the taxes and were being taxed without representation for that figure under Lincoln's administration.

    And all that money was being used for northern infrastructure and none of it was being used in the south which was being used for the benefit of northern business as a cash cow for them.

  7. #111 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    696
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 368 Times in 263 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 13 Times in 13 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by philly rabbit View Post
    Because the southern states composed of twenty five percent of the population of the country and southerners were paying seventy five percent of the taxes and were being taxed without representation for that figure under Lincoln's administration.

    And all that money was being used for northern infrastructure and none of it was being used in the south which was being used for the benefit of northern business as a cash cow for them.
    Um, no. Not according to the leaders of the Confederacy themselves, stupid.

    We've been over this before. They fought the Civil War because they wanted to keep slavery. We have the Vice President of the traitorous Confederate States of America's own word on that.

    Are you really and honestly as stupid as everything you say here, or are you just trolling?

    I don't know that anyone anywhere on the face of the planet could actually be so intellectual bereft as you appear to be.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Stelakh For This Post:

    Rune (07-03-2016)

  9. #112 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,354
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,676 Times in 14,049 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

  10. #113 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    England is leaving the EU, the UK is and that includes Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Three is nothing that Wee Jimmy Krankie can do about it!!


Similar Threads

  1. Didn't Texicans want to secede recently?
    By Legion Troll in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-01-2015, 12:16 PM
  2. Why We Should Let the Red States Secede from Obamacare
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-08-2013, 07:37 AM
  3. Should States be able to secede?
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 05-13-2013, 11:16 PM
  4. Most Likely to Secede
    By BRUTALITOPS in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-24-2008, 10:20 AM
  5. Lakota Secede form Libertarian State
    By Timshel in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 12-20-2007, 11:09 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •