rebel
you just want to put people on a list that denies their rights when the reasons for being put on that list are classified. real democraticOriginally Posted by evince
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
rebel
in legal speak, define 'distracted driving'I wondered the same thing.
Maybe if automobile owners who have smartphones push for distracted driving penalties they're hypocrites in bizarro world.
i'll understand if you can't
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A fine upstanding poster
In Threeper Desh-speak, explain how a gun-owning legislator who wants to regulate firearms is a hypocrite.
I'll understand if you can't.
Former Vice President
26 of the Dems who staged anti-gun sit-in are GUNOWNERS!!! HAHAHA
Over 70%want a curb on illegal immigration but you don't give a FUCK about that do you?
rebel
so you prefer questions to questions instead of answers. i understand.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A fine upstanding poster
I didn't think you'd explain. I was right.
rebel
I didn't think you'd have an answer. i was right.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Malarkeyville
That would be true if the goal was to "take every ones guns" but it's not....
I want better control of arms in this country & I own guns-fuckin DUH!!!!! so do lots of ppl that feel the same way-nuts, terrorist, ppl that can't fly on an American plane etc shouldn't have a gun, especially guns that can kill lots & lots of ppl in short periods of time..
Is that asking to much???
Verified User
Wow....you put me in my place with your wit, I surrender to your great intellectual ability.
Right....that's no attempted deflection of YOUR OWN IGNORANCE whatsoever. Nothing subjective, all objectively Relative to the topic.If one assumes they are dealing with the typical inspired internet gossip. I simply have one mission...presenting the objectively testable and provable TRUTH...then moving on leaving the self proclaimed troll flapping his mouth as there is no RETORT of the TRUTH as you have just demonstrated...thus the typical moron induced debate....DEFLECTION. What do I care if the horse is led to the water and then chooses to dry of thirst?
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER...IGNORANCE IS BLISSFULLY ENTERTAINING. A good belly laugh is indeed good for the soul....and you are good, you should be proud if having people laugh at your ignorance if such is the goal. I almost rolled on the floor...when you responded as your history dictates.
Last edited by Ralph; 06-24-2016 at 04:59 PM.
Truthmatters
prove your numbers first
Seahawk (06-24-2016)
12
Prove I'm a racist you lying bag of retardedness.
Verified User
the nytimes represents 85% of America? dumbass
Malarkeyville
Nice avatar.LMAO
Verified User
No.You.Don't.
"The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections." -- West Virginia State Bd. of Ed. v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 638 (1943)
A catalogue of rights was placed in our Constitution, in my view, to protect the individual in his individuality, and neither statutes which put those rights at the mercy of officials nor judicial decisions which put them at the mercy of the mob are consistent with its text or its spirit. -- COMMUNICATIONS ASSN. v. DOUDS, 339 U.S. 382 (1950) (Justice Robert Jackson, concurring opinion)
"The first ten amendments to the Constitution, adopted as they were soon after the adoption of the Constitution, are in the nature of a bill of rights, and were adopted in order to quiet the apprehension of many, that without some such declaration of rights the government would assume, and might be held to possess, the power to trespass upon those rights of persons and property which by the Declaration of Independence were affirmed to be unalienable rights." -- UNITED STATES v. TWIN CITY POWER CO., 350 U.S. 222 (1956)
Former Vice President
26 of the Dems who staged anti-gun sit-in are GUNOWNERS!!! HAHAHA
You don't know Legion Fags MO by now. Much better having the muslime loving cock sucker on ignore.
Posting Rules
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks