A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
my point was specifically to zappa, who hates civilians taking the law in to their own hands and loves seeing them held accountable for it, but excuses cops at the drop of a hat if they did the very same thing, even to the point of having killed an innocent during the course of their 'job'.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
What kind of country have we become?
One in which federal prosecutors can take “evidence” before a “grand jury,”
and that grand jury can “vote to indict” a former president for 91 alleged “crimes”?
What kind of country have we become?
One in which federal prosecutors can take “evidence” before a “grand jury,”
and that grand jury can “vote to indict” a former president for 91 alleged “crimes”?
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Watermark, let's start a Go Fund Me account for this true American hero!
FUCK THE POLICE (05-12-2016)
What? Is there no COMMON LAW on the books that make this type of behavior "illegal"? If there is....what is the point of this thread unless is to lobby to take away the constitutional rights of the 99.999999% that would never think of acting in such a manner as to endanger the public by "illegally" discharging his/her firearm in public?
Another what? Are you fascists on the left (the one's attempting to take away the portions of the Constitution and Bill of Rights that has been part of the RULE OF LAW in this nation since its inception...in turning this REPUBLIC into a fascist anarchist type of SOCIAL DEMOCRACY where the rule of law is simply a suggestion to be applied only when it suits one's political needs).......REALLY that STUPID or think the majority of the people's in this nation cannot see through this transparent attempt to collectively punish the majority righteous law abiding citizens by making more SUPERFLUOUS DICTATORIAL LEFT WING LAWS in relation to settled CONSTITUTIONAL LAW?
Why is it always the FASCIST left that suggests the STANDARD OF LAW (The Constitution and the States Bill of Rights) in a nation governed by the RULE OF LAW is somehow flawed if it does not reflect total CENTRAL GOVERNMENT CONTROL of this supposedly free self governed society?
Every time you look up its another post from some LEFTIST suggesting that the 1st, 2nd, 10th Article of the Bill of Rights or Articles, Sections, and Clauses found in the Constitution somehow do not apply...because the clear and unambiguous language, written at an 8th grade comprehension level in the CONSTITUTION....simply can't be UNDERSTOOD by the average citizen and must be "INTERPRETED" by 9 CIVIL SERVANTS who have never been elected to office in order to clear that simple language up.
Why does OF become FROM when interpreted as in FREEDOM "OF" RELIGION amended by opinion to read FREEDOM FROM RELIGION....why is an entire Clause of the Constitution "interpreted" to be AMBIGUOUS when its clearly defined by the authors of the Constitution in the Federalist Papers (Article four, Section four, Clause one)....to name just one...another is COMMON WELFARE changing from national defense and infrastructure INTERPRETED to mean NANNY STATE in relation to providing GIFTS from BIG BROTHER to those who refuse to work for a living....
Its ALWAYS THE LEFT that demand the RULE OF LAW be amended void of any congressional representation....but from the BENCH. Its the reason for the Dog and Phony Show every time some judge dies or retires....the left wants the best left wing radical judges MONEY CAN PURCHASE in order to LEGISLATE LAW FROM THE BENCH because the lefts ideology can never be passed in CONGRESS where all laws supposedly originate in this republic.
The reality? SCOTUS does not possess the authority to "interpret"/AMEND the constitution by OPINION. The constitution is a written CONTRACT between the STATES in limiting the power and scope of the Federal Government. Yet...SCOTUS self claims to have the authority to change that contract void of the PEOPLES REPRESENTATIVES? Imagine that....a portion of the Federal Government claiming to have the power to CHANGE THE CONTRACT that places limits upon the Federal Government. This is the AMERICA the LEFT wants and DEMANDS a mirrored reflection of COMMUNIST DEMOCRACY were all power and rights originates with the CENTRAL GOVERNMENT instead of resting with the STATES/PEOPLE.
Last edited by Ralph; 05-12-2016 at 01:20 PM.
Are you sad because you fear that you'll be arrested if you decide to play Citizen Cop with your popgun?
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Bookmarks