Can Sandy Hook Families Hold the Gun Industry Accountable?

[Leonthecat]

I should have said "should" they be able to sue.

And, does the law say they are not liable for everything?

When car manufacturers sell a product that kills people, they are sued and they recall their product so it can be made less lethal.

[ChoppedLiver]

When car manufacturers sell a product that kills people, they are sued and they recall their product so it can be made less lethal.

That doesn't apply, you stupid piece of shit.

Defects are "suable".

The gun(s) fired.

No defect.

Sue the defective shooter for all he had, you worthless piece of monkey spunk.

[Konono]

Using a gun to kill is not a 'misuse' of the lethal weapon. That's what it was manufactured to do and that was its manufacturer's intent and it is inherent in its design.

[moon]

I should have said "should" they be able to sue.

Police forces- as far as I'm aware- can be licenced to kill people under certain, clearly defined, circumstances. Within those legal parameters, no

And, does the law say they are not liable for everything?

I don't follow.

[moon]

Using a gun to kill is not a 'misuse' of the lethal weapon. That's what it was manufactured to do and that was its manufacturer's intent and it is inherent in its design.

That's correct. A ' misuse ' of a gun designed specifically to kill people would be to put it out of action.

[Leonthecat]

That doesn't apply, you stupid piece of racist shit.

Defects are "suable".

The gun(s) fired.

No defect.

Sue the defective shooter for all he had, you worthless piece of monkey spunk.

I thought guns were supposed to deter crime. If they kill they fail to live up to expectations, Princess conduit.

[Konono]

When car manufacturers sell a product that kills people, they are sued and they recall their product so it can be made less lethal.

Are they sued when someone intentionally kills someone and the car is without defect?

[Leonthecat]

Are they sued when someone intentionally kills someone and the car is without defect?

Cars are not designed to kill.
Guns are.

[Konono]

Police forces- as far as I'm aware- can be licenced to kill people under certain, clearly defined, circumstances. Within those legal parameters, no



I don't follow.

You said the law doesn't hold them liable. Can manufacturers be liable for anything?

[Konono]

That's correct. A ' misuse ' of a gun designed specifically to kill people would be to put it out of action.

What? Are you saying that to use a gun to not kill someone is...what?

[Leonthecat]

What? Are you saying that to use a gun to not kill someone is...what?

Target practice, to practice killing.

[Konono]

All target practice leads to killing?

[Buckly J. Ewer]

All target practice leads to killing?

That's the idea when the target looks like a human ...duh...

[ChoppedLiver]

I thought guns were supposed to deter crime. If they kill they fail to live up to expectations, Princess conduit.

Vehicles are made so people can use them to transport people and goods from place to place.

Some use vehicles to commit crimes and/or use them as a weapon.

Does the vehicle manufacturer get sued when a criminal missuses a vehicle to commit a crime, you stupid piece of monkey shit?

[ChoppedLiver]

That's the idea when the target looks like a human ...duh...

That's where the self defense to deter crime comes into play, you ignorant negro dumb fuck.