is that any reason to make it worse?.....
The definition of marriage has changes drastically in his church in the last 85 years!
" Happy day? Why is that, pinhead? " Dixie's reaction to OBL being killed.
"Is that just math you use as a Republican to make yourself feel better?" - Fox News to Karl Rove
is that any reason to make it worse?.....
It's not better or worse, it just is.
" Happy day? Why is that, pinhead? " Dixie's reaction to OBL being killed.
"Is that just math you use as a Republican to make yourself feel better?" - Fox News to Karl Rove
Religous tadition should not be reflected in secular law.
Jarod (08-03-2012)
" Happy day? Why is that, pinhead? " Dixie's reaction to OBL being killed.
"Is that just math you use as a Republican to make yourself feel better?" - Fox News to Karl Rove
I call monogamous relationships that when I am defenerating between them. I cally Polygamous relationships when I am defenerating between them.
Even if what you are saying were true, if it were your "tradition" it is no reason to try to force that "tradition" onto others, or to legally prevent them from establishing there own "tradition"!
Jewish people get married under a hupa, I dont see them trying to make it the law that you are not legally married if you dont get married under a hupa.
" Happy day? Why is that, pinhead? " Dixie's reaction to OBL being killed.
"Is that just math you use as a Republican to make yourself feel better?" - Fox News to Karl Rove
Yes, but in normal parlance, when you argue for 'gay' marriage as opposed to 'traditional' marriage, you don't call it 'monogamous' marriage. It is presumed 'monogamous' because that is part of what defines traditional. On the other hand, 'polygamy' is used exclusively to differentiate between itself and 'traditional' or 'monogamous' relationships. In other words, it is called "polygamy" for a reason, it is not traditional, or part of traditional marriage. Even YOU prove this yourself! With no help from me at all, just your own words and terminology in everyday conversation.
Well see here's the thing, it's not just MY tradition. It is THE tradition. You want to change THE tradition, to include YOUR tradition, and I get that, really, I do! But yes, I can indeed legally prevent you from usurping THE tradition and making it YOUR tradition. I can legally prevent you from usurping ANY tradition that is rooted in the Constitution and is an inalienable right. I can even amend the Constitution to protect THE tradition, if I see fit. So don't tell me what I can and can't do.Even if what you are saying were true, if it were your "tradition" it is no reason to try to force that "tradition" onto others, or to legally prevent them from establishing there own "tradition"!
What you and the rest of you Pro-Gay-Rights clowns need to understand, first and foremost, is that Americans are largely opposed to changing tradition. Much of that is rooted in their core religious beliefs, and the teaching of these religious beliefs for generations. It is ingrained into our values as a society in a way that you can not overcome with these vitriolic strong-arm goon tactics, like you are fighting civil rights in the 60s. It won't work on this! It has FAIL written all over it, because you underestimate the general public sentiment on this issue. The very people you need support from, are those you wish to attack, condemn, and criticize as bigots and homophobes, and you just don't seem to get that.
Do Jewish people allow same-sex marriage?Jewish people get married under a hupa, I dont see them trying to make it the law that you are not legally married if you dont get married under a hupa.
Its biology, not religious tradition. Marriage is between a man and a woman for the same reason all the birds around here pair off into couples made up of a male and female to build heir nests each year. BIOLOGY. not religion. Thats why EVERY religion around the world dictates marriage between a man and a woman. Not because of religion but instead the biological requirements of procreation.
Bookmarks