+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: Ruf-Ro Palin's Pissed!

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    1,175
    Thanks
    150
    Thanked 132 Times in 119 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 86 Times in 76 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gatorman View Post
    Casual but accurate reporting is not "pouncing" as you imply. Sometimes the truth is simply interesting and hilarious. Many of us get that. You obviously have a hard on for a publication. I note that it is you that rejects objective journalism to the support of wild-eyed bullshit from your typical rightwing sources. Just what in the article has you upset, j-bird?

    funny you should use the phrase "typical" when it comes to sourcing...Newsweek, is unabashed in its known liberal conjecture ever since they enveloped the Daily Beast into their folds. And this article is no different....heavy on speculation, heavy on conjecture, and supposed liberal advice for Romney, but falls flat when you take into account their support of the Obama campaign...I don't see one sentence in that entire 3 page diatribe of story telling, that attributes anything to the misleading title they head the garbage with...It might work for a less politically astute reader, but to me it is laughable, and should be in the tabloid section instead of anything resembling journalism...Because we all know by now in this country journalism is dead.
    Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty. - Ronald Reagan

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,883
    Thanks
    1,419
    Thanked 520 Times in 406 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 230 Times in 210 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by j-mac View Post
    funny you should use the phrase "typical" when it comes to sourcing...Newsweek, is unabashed in its known liberal conjecture ever since they enveloped the Daily Beast into their folds. And this article is no different....heavy on speculation, heavy on conjecture, and supposed liberal advice for Romney, but falls flat when you take into account their support of the Obama campaign...I don't see one sentence in that entire 3 page diatribe of story telling, that attributes anything to the misleading title they head the garbage with...It might work for a less politically astute reader, but to me it is laughable, and should be in the tabloid section instead of anything resembling journalism...Because we all know by now in this country journalism is dead.
    Many millions far smarter than you fully disagree with everything you just said. Agenda driven? That seems to be your forte'. The so-called drivel in the article? I note that you can't find anything in it to actually address or competently criticize. What a moran!!!!!! Keep your day gig, j-bird.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Pissed off!
    By Professor Baxter in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-23-2010, 09:11 PM
  2. How pissed off is this guy?
    By Aoxomoxoa in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-28-2010, 01:14 AM
  3. Ill bet Hillary is pissed...
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-26-2008, 11:01 AM
  4. I Am Seriously Pissed Off
    By OrnotBitwise in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-26-2006, 10:56 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts