Wow. If you don't want to talk about writing ideas just go to another thread. Dixie posts in many where garbage like this would be more appropriate. If talking about ideas is too hard for you there are plenty of other threads talking about events.
Excellence is an art won by training and habituation. We do not act rightly because we have virtue or excellence, but rather we have those because we have acted rightly. We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit.
- -- Aristotle
Believe nothing on the faith of traditions, even though they have been held in honor for many generations and in diverse places. Do not believe a thing because many people speak of it. Do not believe on the faith of the sages of the past. Do not believe what you yourself have imagined, persuading yourself that a God inspires you. Believe nothing on the sole authority of your masters and priests. After examination, believe what you yourself have tested and found to be reasonable, and conform your conduct thereto.
- -- The Buddha
...
![]()
China Apologist (07-08-2012), Mott the Hoople (07-07-2012), Rune (07-07-2012)
People write for lots of different reasons. I write cos I am paid (most of that is crap) and I also write cos that is just what I do (most of that is crap too). But a writer has a million stories all fighting to be heard. Often a story is going to be entertaining for no one but the writer but that doesn't mean it should not be written. Sometimes only one person likes what you write, could be a friend or wife or even a stranger. That one person makes it a success. One's excitement, one's emotions 'injected' into someone else. Communication complete.
But, my own view is that a writer who lacks ideas is not a writer. To try and write someone else's story is doomed to failure. It may be a lucrative failure as in ghost writing, but artistically it is a failure.
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/blog.php?u=237
If you feel so inclined a comment would be appreciated.
Respect a believers right to believe, but they should damn well repect our right to challenge such utterly illogical notions.
Canceled (07-07-2012)
Skeleton Jelly (07-07-2012)
Nothing wrong with that. I keep a notebook and start dozens of stories and then something happens that leads me elsewhere. But I sometimes come back to them and do a bit more and then one day I think it might be worth taking it more seriously even to the extent of proof reading it. But different people, different methods, different turn-ons.
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/blog.php?u=237
If you feel so inclined a comment would be appreciated.
Respect a believers right to believe, but they should damn well repect our right to challenge such utterly illogical notions.
Have you ever heard of NaNoWriMo? It stands for Nation Novel Writing Month. My son is big into it and swears he loves where it takes him. You start with an idea on November 1st, and try to write a 50,000 word novel in 30 days. Not a polished work, but a rough draft. The idea is you just go at it for 30 days, streaming words out.
I think so. Didn't someone mention it here last year or the year before? But that is quite a commitment, 30 days... hell it's a committment to do ANYTHING in 30 days.
I used to do something similar with students. It is called a writing storm and you spend an hour or two discussing an idea and defining the characters and plot then, when everything is clear, you put your head down and spew the story onto the paper, warts and all. The result is really lively writing and students are amazed at how much they can write in say 30 minutes. But 30 days?? I don't think I have EVER had access to 30 days straight. What happens when someone invites you out or away for a few days. Too much pressure for me.
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/blog.php?u=237
If you feel so inclined a comment would be appreciated.
Respect a believers right to believe, but they should damn well repect our right to challenge such utterly illogical notions.
Rune (07-08-2012)
No, but in the book, it actually takes decades for the initial 'contact' to be taken seriously because of the lack of physical proof. During that period, two distinct groups emerge, the 'believers' and 'non-believers' and of course, they vehemently clash. What is interesting, is many of the 'non-believers' are religious people, who are clinging to their dogma to the bitter end. It is actually physical scientists who continue to examine the possibility, which results in the 'contact' ultimately being confirmed. Of course, this doesn't happen until years after the death of the priest who made the initial contact. He died with the stigma of being a nutball who no one really ever believed.
Another interesting aspect, is the stark contrast in what "they" view as morality and ethics, and what we have come to know. Differences in the paths our respective species took through their evolution. Things they routinely do, appalls us to no end, we can't comprehend it because it seems so barbaric and heinous compared to our own morals and ethics. Of course, they believe their morality is fundamental and correct, while WE are the barbarians.
China Apologist (07-09-2012)
Bookmarks