+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 145

Thread: SCOTUS deals biggest blow to Liberalism in 100 years!

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    10,656
    Thanks
    3,134
    Thanked 6,587 Times in 4,156 Posts
    Groans
    65
    Groaned 357 Times in 336 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    19 out of 21 judicial scholars said it was legal
    I wonder if the remaining 3 just haven't had a chance to "really look at it yet"? Because if that's the case, one of them might be Damo.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Darla For This Post:

    LadyT (06-28-2012)

  3. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    24,049
    Thanks
    765
    Thanked 1,120 Times in 940 Posts
    Groans
    818
    Groaned 1,108 Times in 1,001 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Oh, my bad, I thought this was a direct quote from your opening post, "Never again, can we have Liberals trot out a liberal idea and cite the commerce clause as their basis for authority."

    That sure sounds like a claim that the Commerce Clause was overturned.
    Yes, your Liberal understanding and interpretation of the commerce clause is HISTORY!

    That's what I am saying.

  4. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    24,049
    Thanks
    765
    Thanked 1,120 Times in 940 Posts
    Groans
    818
    Groaned 1,108 Times in 1,001 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by c'est la vie View Post
    To Dixie's credit, he actually made some decent points. It established the precedent that the Federal government cannot use the CC to do whatever the fuck they want. It may also make it easier to repeal. If Republicans can simply repeal the tax, the whole POS law will fall apart.
    BINGO!

    And the net result? We get rid of Obamacare AND restrict future Congresses from implementing Federal expansion on their claims of 'commerce clause' protection.

    WIN/WIN!

  5. The Following User Groans At Canceled For This Awful Post:

    The Dude (06-30-2012)

  6. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    30,458
    Thanks
    4,236
    Thanked 4,892 Times in 3,535 Posts
    Groans
    80
    Groaned 482 Times in 459 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leaningright View Post
    Oncelor, you were wrong. It's only 6 paragraphs,
    He was spot on about the divine comedy part though. LOL
    You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!

    http://www.justplainpolitics.com/pic...&pictureid=305

  7. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    19,596
    Thanks
    1,430
    Thanked 4,976 Times in 3,049 Posts
    Groans
    177
    Groaned 407 Times in 370 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dixie View Post
    You correct, that wouldn't have happened. The fact that you think it should have happened if logic applied, because we live in a black and white world, is stunning to me. It would have been a huge defeat for Liberals if Obamacare had been struck down, no doubt. But if it had been struck down and the commerce clause left ambiguous as it has been the past 100 years, it wouldn't have been a good thing. It is much better, from a constitutional constructionist view, that the commerce clause was defined and limited here.

    What it means is, Liberals can no longer expand government by running to the commerce clause. That ended today with this ruling. IF such expansions happen in the future, they can only happen as a TAX, which the SCOTUS reaffirmed the Federal government's right to levy. If we want to pass things like Obamacare, we can't call it something other than a tax, and we can't pay for it with Medicare or any other money the people have established for other purposes. For the party who claims to not want tax increases for the middle class, this is particularly troubling, no? For the party opposed to ANY increase in tax and smaller government, this is kind of a feather in the cap, is it not?
    cool. so everything is the same as it was before, we've just called it something else. and you're happy about that?
    What you just read is a serious comment
    +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+

    Need to contact me quickly?

    Twitter: @JPPGrind (do this if you want near instant results)

  8. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    30,458
    Thanks
    4,236
    Thanked 4,892 Times in 3,535 Posts
    Groans
    80
    Groaned 482 Times in 459 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rana View Post
    Cantor claims the House still plans to repeal Obamacare, what, if anything, do they plan to replace it with?
    There just blowing smoke. It's empty rhetoric. Republicans would need complete control of our government to repeal it. They would need to have control of the White house, the house of reps and 60 seats in the senate. I don't see that happening anytime soon.
    You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!

    http://www.justplainpolitics.com/pic...&pictureid=305

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Mott the Hoople For This Post:

    The Dude (06-30-2012)

  10. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    19,596
    Thanks
    1,430
    Thanked 4,976 Times in 3,049 Posts
    Groans
    177
    Groaned 407 Times in 370 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dixie View Post
    BINGO!

    And the net result? We get rid of Obamacare AND restrict future Congresses from implementing Federal expansion on their claims of 'commerce clause' protection.

    WIN/WIN!
    yeah they can't use the commerce clause for whatever the fuck they want. they'll just use tax law for whatever the fuck they want.
    What you just read is a serious comment
    +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+

    Need to contact me quickly?

    Twitter: @JPPGrind (do this if you want near instant results)

  11. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    16,544
    Thanks
    16,608
    Thanked 4,586 Times in 3,396 Posts
    Groans
    414
    Groaned 433 Times in 391 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Derp Derp View Post
    There just blowing smoke. It's empty rhetoric. Republicans would need complete control of our government to repeal it. They would need to have control of the White house, the house of reps and 60 seats in the senate. I don't see that happening anytime soon.
    True, but Romney said today, repeal it, so we can replace it, what does that mean?
    An Egyptian writer, Ptah Hotep, put patriarchal beliefs as clearly as
    anyone in the early civilizations: "If you are a man of note, found for
    yourself a household, and love your wife at home, as it beseems. Fill her
    belly, clothe her back. . . . But hold her back from getting the mastery.
    Remember that her eye is her stormwind, and her vulva and mouth are her
    strength."

  12. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    30,458
    Thanks
    4,236
    Thanked 4,892 Times in 3,535 Posts
    Groans
    80
    Groaned 482 Times in 459 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by c'est la vie View Post
    To Dixie's credit, he actually made some decent points. It established the precedent that the Federal government cannot use the CC to do whatever the fuck they want. It may also make it easier to repeal. If Republicans can simply repeal the tax, the whole POS law will fall apart.
    Good luck with that. You've lost SCOTUS on the issue so You'll need to gain the White House, The House of Reps and gain 60 seats in the Senate. In other words, I wouldn't hold your breath if I was you.
    You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!

    http://www.justplainpolitics.com/pic...&pictureid=305

  13. The Following User Groans At Mott the Hoople For This Awful Post:

    Rationalist (06-28-2012)

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Mott the Hoople For This Post:

    christiefan915 (06-28-2012)

  15. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    30,458
    Thanks
    4,236
    Thanked 4,892 Times in 3,535 Posts
    Groans
    80
    Groaned 482 Times in 459 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rana View Post
    True, but Romney said today, repeal it, so we can replace it, what does that mean?
    Nothing and I bet he sure as hell wont' answer that question either.
    You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!

    http://www.justplainpolitics.com/pic...&pictureid=305

  16. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    14,891
    Thanks
    66
    Thanked 124 Times in 69 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 6 Times in 5 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    LOL, yeah, a big blow to liberals.

    Or at least 1/3 of them.
    "Fuck you niggers" July 11, 2009 Tinfoil explaining how conservatives are unfairly labeled as racists.

    "You deserve to be beheaded and for your head to placed on a pike, in the middle of the park, where children can see what happens to those that act the way you do." August 5, 2009 USFreedom911's response to a left leaning opinion.

  17. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to LadyT For This Post:

    China Apologist (06-28-2012), Mott the Hoople (06-28-2012), The Dude (06-30-2012), ZappasGuitar (06-28-2012)

  18. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    23,308
    Thanks
    915
    Thanked 1,482 Times in 1,161 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 380 Times in 337 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LadyT View Post
    LOL, yeah, a big blow to liberals.

    Or at least 1/3 of them.
    George W. Bush wispered it to him in the shower, or was that Jesus he imagined he was showering with?
    " Happy day? Why is that, pinhead? " Dixie's reaction to OBL being killed.


    "Is that just math you use as a Republican to make yourself feel better?" - Fox News to Karl Rove

  19. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    24,049
    Thanks
    765
    Thanked 1,120 Times in 940 Posts
    Groans
    818
    Groaned 1,108 Times in 1,001 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stupid Proles View Post
    yeah they can't use the commerce clause for whatever the fuck they want. they'll just use tax law for whatever the fuck they want.
    And I think the court appropriately ruled Congress should have the ability to do.

    That's FINE! Obamacare would have NEVER passed, had it been presented as this huge unacceptable tax increase on everyone! It won't survive as such, either. The ONLY way they managed to get this monstrosity passed in Congress, was to HIDE behind the commerce clause, and steal money from Medicare to make it appear they weren't spending money to do it. The SCOTUS just put an abrupt END to that, forever! From this day forward, things like Obamacare, will have to stand on the merit of being a new tax, and will have to be paid for accordingly. This is a tremendous victory for constitutional constructionists.

  20. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    21,446
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 1,982 Times in 1,405 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 287 Times in 274 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dixie View Post
    And I think the court appropriately ruled Congress should have the ability to do.

    That's FINE! Obamacare would have NEVER passed, had it been presented as this huge unacceptable tax increase on everyone! It won't survive as such, either. The ONLY way they managed to get this monstrosity passed in Congress, was to HIDE behind the commerce clause, and steal money from Medicare to make it appear they weren't spending money to do it. The SCOTUS just put an abrupt END to that, forever! From this day forward, things like Obamacare, will have to stand on the merit of being a new tax, and will have to be paid for accordingly. This is a tremendous victory for constitutional constructionists.
    Yes, Virginia - it IS possible to spin anything.

    Dix, someone just ran into my car (true story); can you tell me how this was a win for me today? I need to be comforted.

  21. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Onceler For This Post:

    apple0154 (06-29-2012), China Apologist (06-28-2012), Jarod (06-28-2012), LadyT (06-28-2012), Superfreak (06-28-2012)

  22. #45 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    23,308
    Thanks
    915
    Thanked 1,482 Times in 1,161 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 380 Times in 337 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Onceler View Post
    Yes, Virginia - it IS possible to spin anything.

    Dix, someone just ran into my car (true story); can you tell me how this was a win for me today? I need to be comforted.

    Also have him call Jan Brewer and tell her how she won big in Arazona reciently.
    " Happy day? Why is that, pinhead? " Dixie's reaction to OBL being killed.


    "Is that just math you use as a Republican to make yourself feel better?" - Fox News to Karl Rove

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. I understand Washington D.C. is often about political deals
    By Canceled.LTroll.21 in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-29-2010, 01:21 PM
  2. How DC deals with a snowstorm
    By China Apologist in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-10-2010, 02:08 AM
  3. Secret deals with Iran.. take what you want from it.
    By Chapdog in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-05-2008, 09:09 AM
  4. A developer, his deals and his ties to McCain
    By Socrtease in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 04-22-2008, 05:19 PM
  5. Three New Deals: Why the Nazis and Fascists Loved FDR
    By NewsBoy in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-23-2006, 11:17 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts