An Egyptian writer, Ptah Hotep, put patriarchal beliefs as clearly as
anyone in the early civilizations: "If you are a man of note, found for
yourself a household, and love your wife at home, as it beseems. Fill her
belly, clothe her back. . . . But hold her back from getting the mastery.
Remember that her eye is her stormwind, and her vulva and mouth are her
strength."
An Egyptian writer, Ptah Hotep, put patriarchal beliefs as clearly as
anyone in the early civilizations: "If you are a man of note, found for
yourself a household, and love your wife at home, as it beseems. Fill her
belly, clothe her back. . . . But hold her back from getting the mastery.
Remember that her eye is her stormwind, and her vulva and mouth are her
strength."
“When Kepler found his long-cherished belief did not agree with the most precise observation, he accepted the uncomfortable fact. He preferred the hard truth to his dearest illusions; that is the heart of science.” -Carl Sagan
Atheism is not a religion. It is a personal relationship with reality.
"Certain people" like the CBO?
And we're only headed off a cliff if Congress decides to drive us there. The best thing to do to restore fiscal balance is nothing at all. Congress has to actually do something to take us to a fiscal cliff. Current law would have the government running annual deficits of about %5 of GDP, which is entirely manageable.
An Egyptian writer, Ptah Hotep, put patriarchal beliefs as clearly as
anyone in the early civilizations: "If you are a man of note, found for
yourself a household, and love your wife at home, as it beseems. Fill her
belly, clothe her back. . . . But hold her back from getting the mastery.
Remember that her eye is her stormwind, and her vulva and mouth are her
strength."
The double counting of Medicare cuts is one reason the CBO numbers are wrong.
The other reason is that they have been creating 'fixes' for the Medicare cuts they were supposed to do over the past decade or so. To pretend that Congress will actually make cuts when in the past they have consistently (both parties) refused to make such cuts is absurd.
Quote from Cypress:
"Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.
They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "
True but the same is true on the opposite side of the aisle with Medicare/Medicaid. Substantial reforms will need to be made to keep it viable and Dems are as intransigent on that as Repubs are on defense spending. I won't include SS spending cause that's an easy fix.
I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask them where they're going, and hook up with them later.
Certain people like you, who rely on numbers from the CBO that only a fool would believe. The double counting of Medicare cuts... cuts that are not likely to actually happen... is one major reason their numbers are off. But they have to put forth numbers based on what Congress says 'will happen'.
Are you not the very one that proclaimed my support of tax cuts w/corresponding 'future' spending cuts is ridiculous given the fact that history has shown Congress won't cut spending?
Quote from Cypress:
"Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.
They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "
leaningright (06-28-2012)
Quote from Cypress:
"Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.
They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "
Oh, by the way, my daughter hasn't been able the grands have strep and she is also moving her office! MAybe next week...
An Egyptian writer, Ptah Hotep, put patriarchal beliefs as clearly as
anyone in the early civilizations: "If you are a man of note, found for
yourself a household, and love your wife at home, as it beseems. Fill her
belly, clothe her back. . . . But hold her back from getting the mastery.
Remember that her eye is her stormwind, and her vulva and mouth are her
strength."
Quote from Cypress:
"Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.
They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "
Quote from Cypress:
"Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.
They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "
Bookmarks